Algera Anna Geke, Pierrakos Charalampos, Botta Michela, Zimatore Claudio, Pisani Luigi, Tuinman Pieter-Roel, Bos Lieuwe D J, Lagrand Wim K, Gama de Abreu Marcello, Pelosi Paolo, Serpa Neto Ary, Schultz Marcus J, Cherpanath Thomas G V, Paulus Frederique
Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (LEICA), Amsterdam University Medical Centers Location University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 21;11(9):2309. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092309.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether lower PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) had beneficial effects on myocardial function among intensive care unit (ICU) patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared to higher PEEP. In this pre-planned substudy of a randomized controlled trial (RELAx), comparing lower to higher PEEP, 44 patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography. The exclusion criteria were known poor left ventricular function and severe shock requiring high dosages of norepinephrine. To create contrast, we also excluded patients who received PEEP between 2 cmH2O and 7 cmH2O in the two randomization arms of the study. The primary outcome was the right ventricular myocardial performance index (MPI), a measure of systolic and diastolic function. The secondary outcomes included systolic and diastolic function parameters. A total of 20 patients were ventilated with lower PEEP (mean ± SD, 0 ± 1 cmH2O), and 24 patients, with higher PEEP (8 ± 1 cmH2O) (mean difference, -8 cmH2O; 95% CI: -8.1 to -7.9 cmH2O; = 0.01). The tidal volume size was low in both groups (median (IQR), 7.2 (6.3 to 8.1) versus 7.0 (5.3 to 9.1) ml/kg PBW; = 0.97). The median right ventricular MPI was 0.32 (IQR, 0.26 to 0.39) in the lower-PEEP group versus 0.38 (0.32 to 0.41) in the higher-PEEP group; the median difference was -0.03; 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.03; = 0.33. The other systolic and diastolic parameters were similar. In patients without ARDS ventilated with a low tidal volume, a lower PEEP had no beneficial effects on the right ventricular MPI.
本研究的目的是调查与较高呼气末正压(PEEP)相比,较低PEEP对无急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的重症监护病房(ICU)患者的心肌功能是否有有益影响。在这项预先计划的随机对照试验(RELAx)的子研究中,比较了较低PEEP和较高PEEP,44例患者接受了经胸超声心动图检查。排除标准为已知的左心室功能差和需要高剂量去甲肾上腺素的严重休克。为了形成对比,我们还排除了在研究的两个随机分组中接受2 cmH2O至7 cmH2O之间PEEP的患者。主要结局是右心室心肌性能指数(MPI),这是一种收缩和舒张功能的测量指标。次要结局包括收缩和舒张功能参数。共有20例患者接受较低PEEP通气(平均值±标准差,0±1 cmH2O),24例患者接受较高PEEP通气(8±1 cmH2O)(平均差值,-8 cmH:2O;95%CI:-8.1至-7.9 cmH2O;P = 0.01)。两组的潮气量均较低(中位数(四分位间距),7.2(6.3至8.1)与7.0(5.3至9.1)ml/kg预计体重;P = 0.97)。较低PEEP组的右心室MPI中位数为0.32(四分位间距,0.26至0.39),而较高PEEP组为0.38(0.32至0.41);中位数差值为-0.03;95%CI:-0.11至0.03;P = 0.33。其他收缩和舒张参数相似。在低潮气量通气的无ARDS患者中,较低PEEP对右心室MPI没有有益影响。