• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用传统探针驱动的可延伸旋入式导线和新型预塑形输送鞘进行左束支区域起搏的初步经验。

Initial Experience with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Extendable Screw-In Leads and New Pre-Shaped Delivery Sheaths.

作者信息

Byeon Kyeongmin, Kim Hye Ree, Park Seung-Jung, Park Young Jun, Choi Ji-Hoon, Kim Ju Youn, Park Kyoung-Min, On Young Keun, Kim June Soo

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong 14353, Korea.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju 52727, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 28;11(9):2483. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092483.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11092483
PMID:35566608
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9104478/
Abstract

Until recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAp) has mostly been performed using lumen-less fixed screw leads. There are limited data on LBBAp with conventional style-driven extendable screw-in (SDES) leads, particularly data performed by operators with no previous experience with LBBAp procedures. In total, 42 consecutive patients undergoing LBBAp using SDES leads and newly designed delivery sheaths (LBBAp group) were compared with those treated with conventional right ventricular pacing (RVp) for atrioventricular block (RVp group, n = 84) using propensity score matching (1:2 ratio). The LBBAp was successful in 83% (35/42) of patients, with satisfactory pacing thresholds (0.8 ± 0.2 V at 0.4 ms). In the LBBAp group, the mean paced-QRS duration obtained during RV apical pacing (173 ± 18 ms) was significantly reduced by LBBAp (116 ± 14 ms, p < 0.001). Compared with the RVp group, the LBBAp group showed more physiological pacing, suggested by a much narrower paced-QRS duration (116 ± 14 vs. 151 ± 21 ms, p < 0.001). The pacing threshold was comparable in both groups. The LBBAp group revealed stable pacing thresholds for 6.8 ± 4.8 months post-implant and no serious complications including lead dislodgement or septal perforation. The novel approach of LBBAp using SDES leads and the new dedicated pre-shaped delivery sheaths was effectively and safely performed, even by inexperienced operators with LBBAp procedures.

摘要

直到最近,左束支区域起搏(LBBAp)大多使用无腔固定螺旋电极导线来进行。关于使用传统样式驱动的可伸展旋入式(SDES)电极导线进行LBBAp的数据有限,尤其是由之前没有LBBAp手术经验的操作者进行的相关数据。总共42例连续使用SDES电极导线和新设计的输送鞘管进行LBBAp的患者(LBBAp组),与84例因房室传导阻滞接受传统右心室起搏(RVp)治疗的患者(RVp组)采用倾向评分匹配(1:2比例)进行比较。LBBAp在83%(35/42)的患者中成功,起搏阈值令人满意(在0.4毫秒时为0.8±0.2伏)。在LBBAp组中,可以观察到,右心室心尖部起搏时获得的平均起搏QRS时限(173±18毫秒)在进行LBBAp后显著缩短(116±14毫秒,p<0.001)。与RVp组相比,LBBAp组表现出更多生理性起搏,这表现为起搏QRS时限更窄(116±14对151±21毫秒,p<0.001)。两组的起搏阈值相当。LBBAp组在植入后6.8±4.8个月显示起搏阈值稳定,且未出现包括导线脱位或室间隔穿孔在内的严重并发症。即使是没有LBBAp手术经验的操作者,使用SDES电极导线和新型专用预塑形输送鞘管进行LBBAp的新方法也能有效且安全地实施。

相似文献

1
Initial Experience with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Extendable Screw-In Leads and New Pre-Shaped Delivery Sheaths.使用传统探针驱动的可延伸旋入式导线和新型预塑形输送鞘进行左束支区域起搏的初步经验。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 28;11(9):2483. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092483.
2
Preliminary experience of permanent left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-directed pacing lead without delivery sheath.鞘内无导丝指向性起搏导线行永久性左束支区域起搏的初步经验。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug;45(8):993-1003. doi: 10.1111/pace.14504. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Initial experience of left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads: A multicenter study.鞘内驱动起搏导线行左束支区域起搏的初步经验:一项多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jul;33(7):1540-1549. doi: 10.1111/jce.15558. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
Left bundle branch area pacing using stylet-driven pacing leads with a new delivery sheath: A comparison with lumen-less leads.使用新型输送鞘的 Stylet 驱动起搏导线进行左束支区域起搏:与无腔导线的比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):439-448. doi: 10.1111/jce.14851. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
A Guide to Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads.使用探丝驱动起搏导线进行左束支区域起搏指南
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 21;9:844152. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.844152. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison between left bundle branch area pacing and right ventricular pacing: ventricular electromechanical synchrony and risk of atrial high-rate episodes.左束支区域起搏与右心室起搏的比较:心室机电同步性及房性快速心律失常事件风险
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 25;11:1267076. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1267076. eCollection 2024.
7
Learning Curve Analyses for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing with Conventional Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads.左束支区域起搏的学习曲线分析与常规 Stylet 驱动起搏导线。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 May 18;2023:3632257. doi: 10.1155/2023/3632257. eCollection 2023.
8
[Comparing the impact of left bundle branch area pacing and traditional left ventricular pacing on right heart function following dual-chamber pacemaker implantation].[比较双腔起搏器植入后左束支区域起搏与传统左心室起搏对右心功能的影响]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 24;52(2):180-184. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20230912-00153.
9
Early Experience of Patients with left Bundle Branch Block Corrected through Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared with Conventional Right Ventricular Pacing: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.与传统右心室起搏相比,经左束支区域起搏纠正左束支传导阻滞患者的早期经验:一项单中心回顾性研究
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 May;39(3):394-405. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202305_39(3).20221104B.
10
Immediate clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing vs conventional right ventricular pacing.左束支区域起搏与传统右心室起搏的即刻临床转归。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Aug;42(8):768-773. doi: 10.1002/clc.23215. Epub 2019 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Our Initial Experience of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) With Stylet-Driven Pacing Leads (SDL) in a Tertiary Care Center.我们在三级医疗中心使用探针驱动起搏导线(SDL)进行左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)的初步经验。
Cureus. 2025 May 26;17(5):e84845. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84845. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Current Advance, Challenges and Future Perspectives of Conduction System Pacing.传导系统起搏的当前进展、挑战及未来展望
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 16;25(12):438. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512438. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing over His Bundle Pacing: How Far Have We Come?希氏束起搏基础上的左束支区域起搏:我们进展到了什么程度?
J Clin Med. 2023 May 2;12(9):3251. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093251.
4
EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).EHRA 临床共识声明:心脏起搏的心脏传导系统植入术,由亚太心律学会(APHRS)、加拿大心律学会(CHRS)和拉丁美洲心律学会(LAHRS)共同认可。
Europace. 2023 Apr 15;25(4):1208-1236. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad043.

本文引用的文献

1
Left bundle branch area pacing guided by continuous uninterrupted monitoring of unipolar pacing characteristics.连续不间断监测单极起搏特征指导左束支区域起搏。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Feb;33(2):299-307. doi: 10.1111/jce.15302. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
2
Left bundle branch pacing is the best approach to physiological pacing.左束支起搏是生理性起搏的最佳方法。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2020 Apr 27;1(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.03.002. eCollection 2020 Apr.
3
Left bundle branch pacing compared to left ventricular septal myocardial pacing increases interventricular dyssynchrony but accelerates left ventricular lateral wall depolarization.左束支起搏与左心室间隔心肌起搏相比,增加了室间不同步,但加速了左心室侧壁的去极化。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Aug;18(8):1281-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.04.025. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Repositioning and extraction of stylet-driven pacing leads with extendable helix used for left bundle branch area pacing.使用可延长螺旋的 stylet 驱动起搏导线的重新定位和提取,用于左束支区域起搏。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 May;32(5):1464-1466. doi: 10.1111/jce.15030. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
5
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients.比较起搏器患者左束支起搏与左心室间隔起搏时的心室同步性。
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 17;10(4):822. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040822.
6
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.心脏再同步治疗的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
Long-Term Safety and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Large Single-Center Study.大型单中心研究中的左束支起搏的长期安全性和可行性。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009261. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
8
Permanent His bundle pacing using a new tridimensional delivery sheath and a standard active fixation pacing lead: The telescopic technique.使用新型三维输送鞘管和标准主动固定起搏导线进行永久性希氏束起搏: telescopic technique(直译:伸缩技术)。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):449-457. doi: 10.1111/jce.14869. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
9
Lead performance and clinical outcomes of patients with permanent His-Purkinje system pacing: a single-centre experience.永久性希氏-浦肯野系统起搏患者的临床疗效和表现:单中心经验。
Europace. 2020 Dec 26;22(Suppl_2):ii45-ii53. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa295.
10
Initial Experience, Safety, and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: A Multicenter Prospective Study.左束支区域起搏的初步经验、安全性和可行性:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;6(14):1773-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Sep 16.