Suppr超能文献

专用射频颈动脉PET/MRI线圈的评估

Evaluation of a Dedicated Radiofrequency Carotid PET/MRI Coil.

作者信息

Aizaz Mueez, van der Pol Jochem A J, Wierts Roel, Zwart Hans, van der Werf Abe J, Wildberger Joachim E, Bucerius Jan A, Moonen Rik P M, Kooi Marianne Eline

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.

CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 May 4;11(9):2569. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092569.

Abstract

Carotid radiofrequency coils inside a PET/MRI system can result in PET quantification errors. We compared the performance of a dedicated PET/MRI carotid coil against a coil for MRI-only use. An 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) phantom was scanned without and with an MRI-only coil and with the PET/MRI coil. The decay-corrected normalized activity was compared for the different coil configurations. Eighteen patients were scanned with the three coil configurations. The maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were calculated. Repeated measures ANOVA was performed to assess the differences in SUVmax and SNR between the coil configurations. In the phantom study, the PET/MRI coil demonstrated a slight decrease (<5%), while the MRI-only coil showed a substantial decrease (up to 10%) in normalized activity at the position of coil elements compared to no dedicated coil configuration. In the patient study, the SUVmax values for both no surface coil (3.59 ± 0.15) and PET/MRI coil (3.54 ± 0.15) were significantly higher (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively) as compared to the MRI-only coil (3.28 ± 0.16). No significant difference was observed between PET/MRI and no surface coil (p = 1.0). The SNR values for both PET/MRI (7.31 ± 0.44) and MRI-only (7.62 ± 0.42) configurations demonstrated significantly higher (p < 0.001) SNR values as compared to the no surface coil (3.78 ± 0.22), while no significant difference was observed in SNR between the PET/MRI and MRI-only coil (p = 1.0). This study demonstrated that the PET/MRI coil can be used for PET imaging without requiring attenuation correction while acquiring high-resolution MR images.

摘要

正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MRI)系统内部的颈动脉射频线圈可能会导致PET定量误差。我们比较了专用PET/MRI颈动脉线圈与仅用于MRI的线圈的性能。使用一个18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)体模,分别在不使用线圈、使用仅用于MRI的线圈以及使用PET/MRI线圈的情况下进行扫描。对不同线圈配置下经衰变校正的归一化活度进行比较。对18名患者使用这三种线圈配置进行扫描。计算最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)和信噪比(SNR)。采用重复测量方差分析来评估不同线圈配置之间SUVmax和SNR的差异。在体模研究中,与未使用专用线圈配置相比,PET/MRI线圈在归一化活度方面显示出轻微下降(<5%),而仅用于MRI的线圈在线圈元件位置处显示出大幅下降(高达10%)。在患者研究中,与仅用于MRI的线圈(3.28±0.16)相比,未使用表面线圈(3.59±0.15)和PET/MRI线圈(3.54±0.15)的SUVmax值均显著更高(分别为p = 0.03和p = 0.04)。PET/MRI线圈与未使用表面线圈之间未观察到显著差异(p = 1.0)。与未使用表面线圈(3.78±0.22)相比,PET/MRI(7.31±0.44)和仅用于MRI(7.62±0.42)配置的SNR值均显著更高(p < 0.001),而PET/MRI线圈与仅用于MRI的线圈之间在SNR方面未观察到显著差异(p = 1.0)。本研究表明,PET/MRI线圈可用于PET成像,无需进行衰减校正,同时可获取高分辨率MR图像。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5bf/9101928/4b486a9ce89f/jcm-11-02569-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验