Wachtel Nikolaus, Heidekrueger Paul I, Brenner Carolin, Endres Maximilian, Burgkart Rainer, Micheler Carina, Thon Niklas, Ehrl Denis
Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Centre of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2022 May 5;11(9):2600. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092600.
The closure of wounds and subsequent optimal wound healing is essential to any successful surgical intervention. Especially on parts of the body with limited possibilities for local reconstruction, optimal distribution of load is essential. The aim of the present study was therefore to examine three different incision patterns, conventional straight, Lazy-S and Zigzag, with regard to their biomechanical stability and mode of failure on a porcine skin model. Our results demonstrate the superior biomechanical stability of Lazy-S and Zigzag incision patterns with perpendicular suture placement. This holds true, in particular, for Zigzag incisions, which showed the highest values for all parameters assessed. Moreover, the observed superior stability of Lazy-S and Zigzag incision patterns was diminished when sutures were placed in tensile direction. The conventional straight incision represents the standard access for a large number of surgical procedures. However, we were able to demonstrate the superior biomechanical stability of alternative incision patterns, in particular the Zigzag incision. This is most likely caused by an improved distribution of tensile force across the wound due to the perpendicular placement of sutures. Moreover, this technique offers additional advantages, such as a better overview of the operated area as well as several cosmetic improvements. We therefore advocate that the surgeon should consider the use of a Zigzag incision over a conventional straight incision pattern.
伤口的闭合以及随后的最佳伤口愈合对于任何成功的手术干预都至关重要。特别是在局部重建可能性有限的身体部位,负荷的最佳分布至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是在猪皮肤模型上研究三种不同的切口模式,即传统直线型、Lazy-S型和之字形,考察它们的生物力学稳定性和失效模式。我们的结果表明,采用垂直缝合时,Lazy-S型和之字形切口模式具有更好的生物力学稳定性。尤其对于之字形切口而言,在所评估的所有参数中其值最高,情况确实如此。此外,当缝线沿拉伸方向放置时,Lazy-S型和之字形切口模式所观察到的卓越稳定性会降低。传统直线型切口是大量外科手术的标准入路。然而,我们能够证明替代切口模式,特别是之字形切口,具有更好的生物力学稳定性。这很可能是由于缝线垂直放置,使拉伸力在伤口上分布更均匀所致。此外,该技术还有其他优点,如能更好地观察手术区域以及在美观方面有多种改善。因此,我们主张外科医生应考虑使用之字形切口而非传统直线型切口模式。