• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国以稻草为基础的生物质能源项目的比较环境生命周期评估。

A comparative environmental life cycle assessment of rice straw-based bioenergy projects in China.

机构信息

College of Engineering, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt D):113404. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113404. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113404
PMID:35568236
Abstract

Bioenergy is a promising solution for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation. However, the emissions resulting from the different production stages must be quantified and evaluated. The life cycle assessment (LCA) method was used to compare and quantify the environmental burdens of three rice straw (RS) utilization scenarios for producing biogas, briquette fuel, and syngas. To our knowledge, this is the first study that applies the LCA approach to assess these three bioenergy scenarios in a single study where the main goal was to determine the most sustainable option. A total of 10 mid-point impact categories were investigated. The results indicated that the three scenarios achieved net positive energy and net negative GHG balances. The briquette fuel scenarios had the highest net energy balance (11,115 MJ/tonne dry RS), while the syngas scenario had the highest net GHG (-2,315 kg CO-eq./tonne dry RS). Moreover, the syngas scenario was the most beneficial to the environment, achieving negative results in 9 out of the 10 impact categories; the largest was marine ecotoxicity (-853,897 kg 1,4-DB-eq./tonne dry RS). The biogas scenario achieved emission savings in 3 out of the 10 categories. Although the briquette fuel scenario had no negative values in the 10 categories, its overall contribution to environmental burdens was relatively low. Overall, the order of the three scenarios in terms of the most sustainable option is syngas > briquette fuel > biogas.

摘要

生物能源是减少温室气体 (GHG) 排放的一种有前途的解决方案。然而,必须对不同生产阶段产生的排放进行量化和评估。生命周期评估 (LCA) 方法用于比较和量化三种稻秸 (RS) 利用生物气、型煤燃料和合成气生产的环境负担。据我们所知,这是首次应用 LCA 方法在单一研究中评估这三种生物能源情景的研究,主要目的是确定最可持续的选择。共研究了 10 个中点影响类别。结果表明,这三个方案实现了净正能量和净负温室气体平衡。型煤燃料方案的净能量平衡最高(11115MJ/吨干 RS),而合成气方案的净温室气体平衡最高(-2315kg CO-eq./吨干 RS)。此外,合成气方案对环境最有利,在 10 个影响类别中的 9 个中取得了负面结果;最大的是海洋生态毒性(-853897kg 14-DB-eq./吨干 RS)。沼气方案在 10 个类别中的 3 个类别中实现了排放节约。虽然型煤燃料方案在 10 个类别中没有负面值,但它对环境负担的总体贡献相对较低。总的来说,三种方案中最可持续选择的顺序是合成气>型煤燃料>沼气。

相似文献

1
A comparative environmental life cycle assessment of rice straw-based bioenergy projects in China.中国以稻草为基础的生物质能源项目的比较环境生命周期评估。
Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt D):113404. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113404. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Understanding the environmental impacts of biogas utilization for energy production through life cycle assessment: An action towards reducing emissions.通过生命周期评估理解沼气用于能源生产的环境影响:减排行动。
Environ Res. 2022 Oct;213:113632. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113632. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
3
Comparison of the energetic, environmental, and economic performances of three household-based modern bioenergy utilization systems in China.比较中国三种基于家庭的现代生物能源利用系统的能源、环境和经济性能。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110481. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110481. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Green cheese: partial life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and energy intensity of integrated dairy production and bioenergy systems.绿色奶酪:综合乳制品生产和生物能源系统温室气体排放及能源强度的部分生命周期评估
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Mar;98(3):1571-92. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8850. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
5
Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: Integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches.生物能源原料生产的农场系统评估:整合生物经济模型与生命周期分析方法
Agric Syst. 2012 Jun;109:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.02.005.
6
Environmental impacts of a rice-beef-biogas integrated system in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam evaluated by life cycle assessment.采用生命周期评价方法评估越南湄公河三角洲稻-牛-沼气综合系统的环境影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 15;294:112900. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112900. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
7
A life cycle assessment of energy recovery using briquette from wastewater grown microalgae biomass.利用废水培养的微藻生物质制成的压块进行能量回收的生命周期评估。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 1;285:112171. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112171. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
8
Energy and environmental impact analysis of rice cultivation and straw management in northern Thailand.泰国北部水稻种植和秸秆管理的能源和环境影响分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(18):17654-17664. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1961-y. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
9
Life cycle environmental impacts of biogas production and utilisation substituting for grid electricity, natural gas grid and transport fuels.沼气生产和利用替代电网电力、天然气网和运输燃料的生命周期环境影响。
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 15;95:90-101. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.045. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.不同原料的厌氧消化:对沼气工艺能量和环境平衡的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:541-51. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.058. Epub 2013 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Bt Rice Straw Extract on Seed Germination and Plant Growth of Pakchoi: Novel Variables of Cropping System.转Bt基因水稻秸秆提取物对小白菜种子萌发和植株生长的影响:种植系统的新变量
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;14(12):1797. doi: 10.3390/plants14121797.
2
Quantitative Modelling of Biohydrogen Production from Indian Agricultural Residues via Dark Fermentation.通过暗发酵从印度农业残余物生产生物氢的定量建模
ChemistryOpen. 2025 May;14(5):e202400095. doi: 10.1002/open.202400095. Epub 2025 Mar 29.