• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于非抗阻训练女性进行分体式与全身抗阻训练效果的随机试验。

A randomized trial on the efficacy of split-body versus full-body resistance training in non-resistance trained women.

作者信息

Pedersen Helene, Fimland Marius Steiro, Schoenfeld Brad J, Iversen Vegard Moe, Cumming Kristoffer Toldnes, Jensen Susanne, Saeterbakken Atle Hole, Andersen Vidar

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, PB 133, 6851, Sogndal, Norway.

Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 May 14;14(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00481-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13102-022-00481-7
PMID:35568897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9107721/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a 12-week upper/lower split- versus a full-body resistance training program on maximal strength, muscle mass and explosive characteristics. Fifty resistance untrained women were pair-matched according to baseline strength and randomized to either a full-body (FB) routine that trained all of the major muscle groups in one session twice per week, or a split-body program (SPLIT) that performed 4 weekly sessions (2 upper body and 2 lower body). Both groups performed the same exercises and weekly number of sets and repetitions. Each exercise was performed with three sets and 8-12 repetition maximum (RM) loading. Study outcomes included maximal strength, muscle mass, jump height and maximal power output.

RESULTS

No between-group differences were found in any of the variables. However, both FB and SPLIT increased mean 1-RM from pre- to post-test in the bench press by 25.5% versus 30.0%, lat pulldown by 27.2% versus 26.0% and leg press by 29.2% versus 28.3%, respectively. Moreover, both FB and SPLIT increased jump height by 12.5% versus 12.5%, upper-body power by 20.3% versus 16.7% and muscle mass by 1.9% versus 1.7%, p < 0.01, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not show any benefits for split-body resistance-training program compared to full-body resistance training program on measures of maximal- and explosive muscle strength, and muscle mass.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN81548172, registered 15. February 2022.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估一项为期12周的上下肢分开训练与全身阻力训练计划对最大力量、肌肉质量和爆发力特征的效果。50名未经训练的女性根据基线力量进行配对,并随机分为两组,一组进行全身(FB)训练,每周两次,每次训练所有主要肌肉群;另一组进行分体训练计划(SPLIT),每周训练4次(2次上肢和2次下肢)。两组进行相同的练习,每周的组数和重复次数相同。每个练习进行三组,采用8 - 12次最大重复量(RM)的负荷。研究结果包括最大力量、肌肉质量、跳跃高度和最大功率输出。

结果

在任何变量中均未发现组间差异。然而,FB组和SPLIT组在测试前后的卧推平均1 - RM分别增加了25.5%和30.0%,下拉分别增加了27.2%和26.0%,腿举分别增加了29.2%和28.3%。此外,FB组和SPLIT组的跳跃高度分别增加了12.5%和12.5%,上肢力量分别增加了20.3%和16.7%,肌肉质量分别增加了1.9%和1.7%,p < 0.01。

结论

与全身阻力训练计划相比,本研究未显示分体阻力训练计划在最大和爆发力肌肉力量以及肌肉质量方面有任何益处。

试验注册

ISRCTN81548172,于2022年2月15日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cb/9107721/d6a6ee42a24f/13102_2022_481_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cb/9107721/c382221dc9bb/13102_2022_481_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cb/9107721/f5d346057ffd/13102_2022_481_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cb/9107721/d6a6ee42a24f/13102_2022_481_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cb/9107721/c382221dc9bb/13102_2022_481_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cb/9107721/f5d346057ffd/13102_2022_481_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44cb/9107721/d6a6ee42a24f/13102_2022_481_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized trial on the efficacy of split-body versus full-body resistance training in non-resistance trained women.一项关于非抗阻训练女性进行分体式与全身抗阻训练效果的随机试验。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 May 14;14(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00481-7.
2
Split or full-body workout routine: which is best to increase muscle strength and hypertrophy?分部位训练或全身训练:哪种方法更有助于提高肌肉力量和增长肌肉体积?
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2021 Aug 30;19:eAO5781. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO5781. eCollection 2021.
3
Influence of High- and Low-Frequency Resistance Training on Lean Body Mass and Muscle Strength Gains in Untrained Men.高频和低频抗阻训练对未经训练男性瘦体重和肌肉力量增加的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Aug 1;35(8):2089-2094. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003145.
4
Effects of training frequency on muscular strength for trained men under volume matched conditions.在训练量匹配的条件下,训练频率对受过训练的男性肌肉力量的影响。
PeerJ. 2021 Feb 18;9:e10781. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10781. eCollection 2021.
5
Influence of exercise order on upper body maximum and submaximal strength gains in trained men.运动顺序对训练有素男性上身最大力量和次最大力量增长的影响。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Sep;33(5):359-63. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12036. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
6
Short-term Periodization Models: Effects on Strength and Speed-strength Performance.短期周期化模型:对力量及速度-力量表现的影响
Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1373-86. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0355-2.
7
Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones.针对三种不同抗阻训练方案的肌肉适应性:重复最大值训练区的特异性
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Nov;88(1-2):50-60. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0681-6. Epub 2002 Aug 15.
8
Comparison of 8-weeks of full versus split body resistance training on appetite and energy intake in non-obese untrained men.比较 8 周全身与部分身体抗阻训练对非肥胖未训练男性食欲和能量摄入的影响。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jul;78(7):647-650. doi: 10.1038/s41430-024-01432-w. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
9
High-Frequency Resistance Training Is Not More Effective Than Low-Frequency Resistance Training in Increasing Muscle Mass and Strength in Well-Trained Men.高频阻力训练并不比低频阻力训练更能有效增加训练有素男性的肌肉质量和力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jul;33 Suppl 1:S130-S139. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002559.
10
Effects of Equal Volume Heavy-Resistance Strength Training Versus Strength Endurance Training on Physical Fitness and Sport-Specific Performance in Young Elite Female Rowers.等量重阻力力量训练与力量耐力训练对年轻优秀女子赛艇运动员体能和专项运动表现的影响
Front Physiol. 2020 Jul 21;11:888. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00888. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
How many times per week should a muscle be trained to maximize muscle hypertrophy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the effects of resistance training frequency.每周应该训练多少次肌肉才能最大限度地促进肌肉肥大?一项系统回顾和荟萃分析研究了抗阻训练频率的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jun;37(11):1286-1295. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1555906. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
2
Effect of Resistance Training Frequency on Gains in Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗阻训练频率对肌肉力量增长的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2018 May;48(5):1207-1220. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0872-x.
3
The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.
肌肉力量的重要性:训练注意事项。
Sports Med. 2018 Apr;48(4):765-785. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0862-z.
4
Frequency: The Overlooked Resistance Training Variable for Inducing Muscle Hypertrophy?频率:被忽视的诱导肌肉肥大的抗阻训练变量?
Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):799-805. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0640-8.
5
Bioelectrical impedance is an accurate method to assess body composition in obese but not severely obese adolescents.生物电阻抗是评估肥胖但非重度肥胖青少年身体成分的一种准确方法。
Nutr Res. 2016 Jul;36(7):663-70. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
6
Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗阻训练频率对肌肉肥大测量指标的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2016 Nov;46(11):1689-1697. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0543-8.
7
Comparisons of a Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to the Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scan in Healthy Young Adults Depending on their Physical Activity Level.根据身体活动水平,对健康年轻成年人进行多频生物电阻抗分析与双能X线吸收法扫描的比较。
J Hum Kinet. 2015 Oct 14;47:73-80. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0063. eCollection 2015 Sep 29.
8
Effect of Two- Versus Three-Way Split Resistance Training Routines on Body Composition and Muscular Strength in Bodybuilders: A Pilot Study.两种与三种分组抗阻训练方案对健美运动员身体成分和肌肉力量的影响:一项初步研究
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2015 Dec;25(6):559-65. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2015-0077. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
Influence of Resistance Training Frequency on Muscular Adaptations in Well-Trained Men.抗阻训练频率对训练有素男性肌肉适应性的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Jul;29(7):1821-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000970.
10
Effects of different resistance training frequencies on flexibility in older women.不同阻力训练频率对老年女性柔韧性的影响。
Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Mar 5;10:531-8. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S77433. eCollection 2015.