Centre for Global Mental Health, Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1837-1.
There is a large treatment gap for common mental disorders (CMD), with wide variation by world region. This review identifies factors associated with formal health service utilisation for CMD in the general adult population, and compares evidence from high-income countries (HIC) with that from low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC).
We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Scopus in May 2016. Eligibility criteria were: published in English, in peer-reviewed journals; using population-based samples; employing standardised CMD measures; measuring use of formal health services for mental health reasons by people with CMD; testing the association between this outcome and any other factor(s). Risk of bias was assessed using the adapted Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We synthesised the results using "best fit framework synthesis", with reference to the Andersen socio-behavioural model.
Fifty two studies met inclusion criteria. 46 (88%) were from HIC. Predisposing factors: There was evidence linking increased likelihood of service use with female gender; Caucasian ethnicity; higher education levels; and being unmarried; although this was not consistent across all studies. Need factors: There was consistent evidence of an association between service utilisation and self-evaluated health status; duration of symptoms; disability; comorbidity; and panic symptoms. Associations with symptom severity were frequently but less consistently reported. Enabling factors: The evidence did not support an association with income or rural residence. Inconsistent evidence was found for associations between unemployment or having health insurance and use of services. There was a lack of research from LMIC and on contextual level factors.
In HIC, failure to seek treatment for CMD is associated with less disabling symptoms and lack of perceived need for healthcare, consistent with suggestions that "treatment gap" statistics over-estimate unmet need for care as perceived by the target population. Economic factors and urban/rural residence appear to have little effect on treatment-seeking rates. Strategies to address potential healthcare inequities for men, ethnic minorities, the young and the elderly in HIC require further evaluation. The generalisability of these findings beyond HIC is limited. Future research should examine factors associated with health service utilisation for CMD in LMIC, and the effect of health systems and neighbourhood factors.
PROSPERO registration number: 42016046551 .
常见精神障碍(CMD)的治疗缺口较大,且在世界各区域差异显著。本综述旨在确定一般成年人群中与 CMD 患者寻求正式卫生服务相关的因素,并比较高收入国家(HIC)和中低收入国家(LMIC)的证据。
我们于 2016 年 5 月检索了 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 Scopus 数据库。纳入标准为:发表于英文期刊、经同行评审、采用基于人群的样本、使用标准化 CMD 措施、调查 CMD 患者因精神健康问题使用正式卫生服务的情况、检验结局与其他因素之间的关联。采用改良的混合方法评价工具评估偏倚风险。我们采用“最佳拟合框架综合法”对结果进行综合,并参考 Andersen 社会行为模型。
共纳入 52 项研究,其中 46 项(88%)来自 HIC。易感性因素:有证据表明,女性、白种人、较高的教育水平和未婚与更高的服务使用可能性相关,但并非所有研究均一致。需求因素:研究均表明,自评健康状况、症状持续时间、残疾、合并症和惊恐症状与服务使用相关。症状严重程度与服务使用的关联常被报道,但一致性较差。促成因素:收入或农村居住情况与服务使用无关联。研究结果不一致,失业或有医疗保险与服务使用之间无关联。来自 LMIC 和关于环境因素的研究较少。
在 HIC,CMD 患者未寻求治疗与症状较少致残及缺乏对医疗保健的需求相关,这与“治疗缺口”统计数据高估目标人群认为的未满足的护理需求的观点一致。经济因素和城乡居住情况对治疗寻求率的影响似乎较小。需要进一步评估针对 HIC 中男性、少数民族、年轻人和老年人的潜在医疗保健不公平问题的策略。这些发现对 HIC 以外地区的适用性有限。未来研究应调查 LMIC 中 CMD 患者寻求卫生服务的相关因素,以及卫生系统和邻里因素的影响。
PROSPERO 注册号:42016046551。