Suppr超能文献

用于测量食管静脉曲张压力的压敏胶囊的批判性评估。体外及犬肠系膜血管研究。

Critical evaluation of a pressure-sensitive capsule for measurement of esophageal varix pressure. Studies in vitro and in canine mesenteric vessels.

作者信息

Polio J, Hanson J, Sikuler E, Vogel G, Gusberg R, Fisher R, Groszmann R J

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 1987 May;92(5 Pt 1):1109-15. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(87)91066-3.

Abstract

The accuracy and reliability of a noninvasive pressure-sensitive capsule for the endoscopic measurement of esophageal varix pressure was evaluated. Capsule pressure was correlated with direct intraluminal pressure measurements. The influence of vessel wall tension on capsule pressure was also assessed. In vitro studies demonstrated an excellent correlation (r greater than or equal to 0.94; p less than 0.001) between the pressure obtained with the capsule and intraluminal pressure over a range of vessel diameters and wall thicknesses. In vivo correlation of pressures obtained with the capsule with direct venous pressure measurements was excellent (r = 0.85). However, this correlation decreased with a decrease in vessel diameter (group 1 diameter greater than or equal to 10 mm, r = 0.95; group 2 diameter greater than or equal to 5 mm but less than 10 mm, r = 0.75; group 3 diameter greater than or equal to 3 mm but less than 5 mm, r = 0.81). This decrease in accuracy was significant (p less than 0.001) between group 1 and groups 2 and 3. In vitro and in vivo, capsule pressure variability was significantly greater (p less than 0.001) in vessels of smaller diameter. Wall tension significantly influenced capsule pressure (p less than 0.05), although this effect was only seen in large "vessels" with a diameter beyond a clinically relevant range. Therefore, despite obtaining technically acceptable capsule pressure measurements in ideal experimental conditions, the accuracy and variability of these measurements are limited by vessel size.

摘要

对一种用于内镜测量食管静脉曲张压力的无创压敏胶囊的准确性和可靠性进行了评估。胶囊压力与腔内直接压力测量值相关。还评估了血管壁张力对胶囊压力的影响。体外研究表明,在一系列血管直径和壁厚范围内,胶囊测得的压力与腔内压力之间具有极好的相关性(r大于或等于0.94;p小于0.001)。胶囊测得的压力与直接静脉压力测量值在体内的相关性也很好(r = 0.85)。然而,这种相关性随着血管直径的减小而降低(第1组直径大于或等于10 mm,r = 0.95;第2组直径大于或等于5 mm但小于10 mm,r = 0.75;第3组直径大于或等于3 mm但小于5 mm,r = 0.81)。第1组与第2组和第3组之间,这种准确性的降低具有显著性(p小于0.001)。在体外和体内,直径较小的血管中胶囊压力变异性显著更大(p小于0.001)。壁张力对胶囊压力有显著影响(p小于0.05),尽管这种效应仅在直径超出临床相关范围的大“血管”中可见。因此,尽管在理想实验条件下获得了技术上可接受的胶囊压力测量值,但这些测量值的准确性和变异性受到血管大小的限制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验