• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体和项目特征可能会影响照顾者参与定制支持干预后的结果的变异性。

Individual and program Characteristics May Drive Variability in Outcomes After Caregivers Participate in a Tailored Support Intervention.

机构信息

Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Aug;41(8):1960-1970. doi: 10.1177/07334648221091564. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.1177/07334648221091564
PMID:35575158
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9364230/
Abstract

Critically needed programs designed to support family caregivers have shown inconsistent reductions in stress and burden. To explore drivers of improvement in caregiver outcomes after participation in a support intervention we analyzed data from a one-on-one, tailored problem-solving intervention targeting caregiver wellbeing (2015-2019, = 503). We explored data patterns across 21 individual, household, and program-level variables using elastic net regression to identify drivers of improvements, and their relative importance. Baseline subjective burden, baseline depressive symptom scores, baseline caregiver problem solving, African American race, and site and coach fixed effects were the most consistent drivers of changes across the explored caregiver outcomes. Caregiver and program characteristics may be promising avenues to target to decrease distress and burden during intervention design. Interventions focusing on highly distressed caregivers may lead to greater improvements. More research is needed to identify how site or interventionists characteristics drive positive intervention effects.

摘要

迫切需要设计支持家庭照顾者的项目,以减轻他们的压力和负担。为了探讨参与支持干预后照顾者结果改善的驱动因素,我们分析了一项针对照顾者福祉的一对一、量身定制的解决问题干预的数据(2015-2019,n=503)。我们使用弹性网络回归分析了 21 个个体、家庭和项目水平变量的数据模式,以确定改善的驱动因素及其相对重要性。基线主观负担、基线抑郁症状评分、基线照顾者解决问题能力、非裔美国人种族以及地点和教练固定效应是探索的照顾者结果中变化的最一致驱动因素。照顾者和项目特征可能是干预设计中减少压力和负担的有希望的目标。关注高度痛苦的照顾者的干预可能会带来更大的改善。需要进一步的研究来确定地点或干预者特征如何推动积极的干预效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/9364230/372199332c0c/10.1177_07334648221091564-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/9364230/372199332c0c/10.1177_07334648221091564-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea1/9364230/372199332c0c/10.1177_07334648221091564-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual and program Characteristics May Drive Variability in Outcomes After Caregivers Participate in a Tailored Support Intervention.个体和项目特征可能会影响照顾者参与定制支持干预后的结果的变异性。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Aug;41(8):1960-1970. doi: 10.1177/07334648221091564. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Effects of a Telehealth Early Palliative Care Intervention for Family Caregivers of Persons With Advanced Heart Failure: The ENABLE CHF-PC Randomized Clinical Trial.远程医疗早期姑息治疗对晚期心力衰竭患者家属的影响:ENABLE CHF-PC 随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202583. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2583.
3
Effectiveness of a strength-oriented psychoeducation on caregiving competence, problem-solving abilities, psychosocial outcomes and physical health among family caregiver of stroke survivors: A randomised controlled trial.一项基于力量的心理教育对脑卒中幸存者家庭照顾者的照顾能力、解决问题能力、心理社会结局和身体健康的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
4
The impact of a problem-solving intervention on increasing caregiver assistance and improving caregiver health.问题解决干预对增加照顾者帮助和改善照顾者健康的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Sep;20(9):1937-47. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1295-5. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
5
Psychosocial predictors of adverse outcomes in rural heart failure caregivers.农村心力衰竭照顾者不良结局的心理社会预测因素。
Rural Remote Health. 2021 Jul;21(3):6497. doi: 10.22605/RRH6497. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
6
Operation family caregiver: Problem-solving training for military caregivers in a community setting.家庭照料者手术:在社区环境中对军人照料者进行问题解决训练。
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Apr;74(4):536-553. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22536. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Psychosocial Factors Related to Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure Caregivers: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.与心力衰竭照顾者不良结局相关的心理社会因素:结构方程模型分析。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):137-148. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000634.
8
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
9
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
10
Postdischarge Intervention for Stroke Caregivers: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.中风患者照料者出院后干预措施:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 11;9(11):e21799. doi: 10.2196/21799.

引用本文的文献

1
Caregiver Support Program May Decrease Work-Family Conflict: An Intervention Study.照顾者支持项目可能会减少工作-家庭冲突:一项干预研究。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251332766. doi: 10.1177/00469580251332766. Epub 2025 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Family Caregivers of Veterans Experience High Levels of Burden, Distress, and Financial Strain.退伍军人的家庭照顾者承受着高负担、痛苦和经济压力。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Nov;68(11):2675-2683. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16767. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
2
Mechanisms Through Which a Family Caregiver Coaching Intervention Might Reduce Anxiety Among Children in Military Households.家庭照料者辅导干预可能通过哪些机制减少军属家庭儿童焦虑。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Oct;24(10):1248-1258. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02964-w.
3
Leveraging institutional support for family caregivers to meet the health and vocational needs of persons with disabilities.
利用机构支持为家庭照顾者提供支持,以满足残疾人士的健康和职业需求。
Nurs Outlook. 2020 Mar-Apr;68(2):184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.08.006. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
4
Is training for informal caregivers and their older persons helpful? A systematic review.对非正式照护者及其老年人进行培训是否有帮助?系统评价。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Jul-Aug;83:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
5
Invisible partners in care: Snapshot of well-being among caregivers receiving comprehensive support from Veterans Affairs.护理中的隐形伙伴:接受退伍军人事务部全面支持的护理人员的幸福状况快照
Health Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 31;2(3):e112. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.112. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Interventions That Support or Involve Caregivers or Families of Patients with Traumatic Injury: a Systematic Review.支持或涉及创伤性损伤患者的照顾者或家庭的干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1177-1186. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4417-7. Epub 2018 May 7.
7
Comprehensive Support for Family Caregivers: Impact on Veteran Health Care Utilization and Costs.对家庭照顾者的全面支持:对退伍军人医疗保健利用和成本的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Feb;76(1):89-114. doi: 10.1177/1077558717697015. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
8
Hidden Heroes: America's Military Caregivers - Executive Summary.无名英雄:美国军事护理人员——执行摘要
Rand Health Q. 2014 Jun 1;4(2):14. eCollection 2014 Summer.
9
Negative Consequences of Family Caregiving for Veterans With PTSD and Dementia.为患有创伤后应激障碍和痴呆症的退伍军人提供家庭护理的负面后果。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Feb;205(2):106-111. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000560.
10
A systematic review of systematic reviews on interventions for caregivers of people with chronic conditions.对慢性病患者照护者干预措施的系统评价的系统综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Apr;71(4):718-34. doi: 10.1111/jan.12523. Epub 2014 Sep 16.