• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

染色体微阵列分析与异常母体血清筛查妊娠中的非侵入性产前检测比较。

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Compared With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnancies With Abnormal Maternal Serum Screening.

机构信息

Genetics Institute, Carmel Medical Center, affiliated to the Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, and the Recanati Genetics Institute, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, the Pediatric Genetics Unit, Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel, and the Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May 1;139(5):877-887. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004758. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004758
PMID:35576346
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of maternal age on the rate of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening and to establish the residual risk for abnormal microarray findings after omitting noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT)-detectable aberrations in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all chromosomal microarray analysis tests performed in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening and normal ultrasonogram results over the years 2013-2021. The rate of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis findings was compared with a local control cohort of 7,235 pregnancies with normal maternal serum screening and ultrasonogram results, stratified by maternal age. Calculation of residual risk for clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results after normal NIPT was performed by omission of common NIPT-detectable anomalies. Systematic review for studies examining the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening was performed from inception to October 2021, with no time or language restrictions.

RESULTS

Of the 559 amniocenteses performed due to abnormal maternal serum screening, 21 (3.8%; 95% CI 2.4-5.7%) clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results were found. The residual risk for chromosomal microarray analysis aberrations after theoretically normal NIPT was estimated to be 2.0% (95% CI 1.1-3.6%) (1/50) and was significantly higher for women younger than age 35 years with abnormal maternal serum screening, compared with women with low-risk pregnancies. Systematic review yielded six articles encompassing 4,890 chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with abnormal maternal serum screening, demonstrating 2.3% residual risk for chromosomal microarray analysis anomalies after theoretically normal NIPT.

DISCUSSION

Clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis findings can be found in 1 of every 50 pregnancies with high-risk maternal serum screening after theoretically normal NIPT, implying that invasive testing and not NIPT should be recommended in such pregnancies. In addition, NIPT use as a first-tier screening modality instead of maternal serum screening would miss pregnancies at increased risk not only for common autosomal trisomies but for additional chromosomal microarray analysis-detectable disorders.

摘要

目的

探讨母体年龄对母体血清筛查异常妊娠中临床显著染色体微阵列分析结果发生率的影响,并确定母体血清筛查异常妊娠中排除非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)可检测到的异常后,异常微阵列结果的残留风险。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2013 年至 2021 年间所有因母体血清筛查异常且超声结果正常而进行的染色体微阵列分析检测。将临床显著(致病性和可能致病性)的染色体微阵列分析发现率与一个当地的对照队列进行比较,该对照队列包括 7235 例母体血清筛查和超声结果正常的妊娠,按母体年龄分层。通过排除常见的 NIPT 可检测到的异常,计算母体血清筛查异常妊娠中 NIPT 正常后临床显著染色体微阵列分析结果的残留风险。从研究开始到 2021 年 10 月,对母体血清筛查异常妊娠中染色体微阵列分析的研究进行了系统综述,无时间和语言限制。

结果

在因母体血清筛查异常而进行的 559 例羊膜穿刺术中,发现 21 例(3.8%;95%CI 2.4-5.7%)临床显著的染色体微阵列分析结果。理论上 NIPT 正常后,染色体微阵列分析异常的残留风险估计为 2.0%(95%CI 1.1-3.6%)(1/50),且对于母体血清筛查异常的年轻女性(<35 岁),风险明显高于低危妊娠的女性。系统综述得出了六篇文章,涵盖了 4890 例母体血清筛查异常妊娠的染色体微阵列分析结果,显示理论上 NIPT 正常后,染色体微阵列分析异常的残留风险为 2.3%。

讨论

在理论上 NIPT 正常的高风险母体血清筛查妊娠中,每 50 例妊娠中就有 1 例可发现临床显著的染色体微阵列分析结果,这意味着在这种情况下,应推荐进行侵入性检测而不是 NIPT。此外,将 NIPT 用作一线筛查方法而不是母体血清筛查,不仅会错过常见常染色体三体的风险增加的妊娠,还会错过其他可通过染色体微阵列分析检测到的疾病。

相似文献

1
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Compared With Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnancies With Abnormal Maternal Serum Screening.染色体微阵列分析与异常母体血清筛查妊娠中的非侵入性产前检测比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May 1;139(5):877-887. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004758. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
2
Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT.孕早期联合筛查与非典型染色体畸变的侵入性诊断:丹麦全国范围内关于产前特征及检测与无创产前检测对比的研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.27667. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Residual risk for clinically significant copy number variants in low-risk pregnancies, following exclusion of noninvasive prenatal screening-detectable findings.在排除了无创产前筛查可检测到的结果后,低风险妊娠中临床显著拷贝数变异的残留风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;226(4):562.e1-562.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
4
The yield of chromosomal microarray in pregnancies with congenital cardiac defects and normal noninvasive prenatal screening.先天性心脏缺陷且无创性产前筛查正常的妊娠患者中进行染色体微阵列分析的效果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;225(3):333.e1-333.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 May 27.
5
Clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies.超声异常妊娠中非侵入性产前检测的临床应用价值
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):721-728. doi: 10.1002/uog.17228.
6
Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review.颈项透明层厚度为 3.0-3.4 毫米时是否需要进行 NIPT 或微阵列检测?队列分析及文献复习。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):765-774. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13877. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
Chromosomal microarray vs. NIPS: analysis of 5541 low-risk pregnancies.染色体微阵列与 NIPS:5541 例低风险妊娠分析。
Genet Med. 2019 Nov;21(11):2462-2467. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0550-x. Epub 2019 May 24.
8
The potential impact of NIPT as a second-tier screen on the outcomes of high-risk pregnancies with rare chromosomal abnormalities.作为二级筛查手段的无创产前检测(NIPT)对患有罕见染色体异常的高危妊娠结局的潜在影响。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Oct;55(5):420-6. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12385. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
9
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions in Average-Risk Pregnancies: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.非侵入性产前检测在平均风险妊娠中用于检测 21 三体、18 三体、13 三体、性染色体非整倍体和微缺失:成本效益分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Jun;42(6):740-749.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.12.007. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
10
Noninvasive prenatal testing, ultrasonographic findings and poor prenatal diagnosis rates for twin pregnancies: a retrospective study.非侵入性产前检测、超声表现与双胎妊娠不良产前诊断率:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 13;23(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05642-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Is intermediate risk really intermediate? Comparison of karyotype and non-invasive prenatal testing results of pregnancies at intermediate risk of trisomy 21 on maternal serum screening.中度风险真的是中度吗?对孕中期血清筛查中21三体中度风险妊娠的核型与无创产前检测结果的比较。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1973. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1973. Epub 2024 Oct 4.