• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈项透明层厚度为 3.0-3.4 毫米时是否需要进行 NIPT 或微阵列检测?队列分析及文献复习。

Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review.

机构信息

Center for Fetal Medicine, Pregnancy and Ultrasound, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):765-774. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13877. Epub 2020 May 12.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13877
PMID:32306377
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7318216/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Currently fetal nuchal translucency (NT) ≥3.5 mm is an indication for invasive testing often followed by chromosomal microarray. The aim of this study was to assess the risks for chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with an NT 3.0-3.4 mm, to determine whether invasive prenatal testing would be relevant in these cases and to assess the residual risks in fetuses with normal non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study and meta-analysis of literature cases with NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm and 2 cohorts of pregnant women referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed: Rotterdam region (with a risk >1:200 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested in the period July 2012 to June 2019 and Central Denmark region (with a risk >1:300 and NT between 3.0 and 3.4 mm) tested between September 2015 and December 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 522 fetuses were referred for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray. Meta-analysis indicated that in 1:7.4 (13.5% [95% CI 8.2%-21.5%]) fetuses a chromosomal aberration was diagnosed. Of these aberrant cases, 47/68 (69%) involved trisomy 21, 18, and 13 and would potentially be detected by all NIPT approaches. The residual risk for missing a (sub)microscopic chromosome aberration depends on the NIPT approach and is highest if NIPT was performed only for common trisomies-1:21 (4.8% [95% CI 3.2%-7.3%]). However, it may be substantially lowered if a genome-wide 10-Mb resolution NIPT test was offered (~1:464).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these data, we suggest that the NT cut-off for invasive testing could be 3.0 mm (instead of 3.5 mm) because of the high risk of 1:7.4 for a chromosomal aberration. If women were offered NIPT first, there would be a significant diagnostic delay because all abnormal NIPT results need to be confirmed by diagnostic testing. If the woman had already received a normal NIPT result, the residual risk of 1:21 to 1:464 for chromosome aberrations other than common trisomies, dependent on the NIPT approach, should be raised. If a pregnant woman declines invasive testing, but still wants a test with a broader coverage of clinically significant conditions then the genome-wide >10-Mb resolution NIPT test, which detects most aberrations, could be proposed.

摘要

简介

目前,胎儿颈项透明层(NT)≥3.5mm 是进行有创性检测的指征,通常随后进行染色体微阵列分析。本研究的目的是评估 NT 在 3.0-3.4mm 之间的胎儿发生染色体异常的风险,以确定在这些情况下是否需要进行有创性产前检测,并评估无创产前检测(NIPT)结果正常的胎儿的剩余风险。

材料和方法

对 NT 在 3.0-3.4mm 之间的文献病例进行回顾性研究和荟萃分析,并对接受有创性检测和染色体微阵列的 2 组孕妇进行了队列研究:鹿特丹地区(风险>1:200 且 NT 在 3.0-3.4mm 之间)于 2012 年 7 月至 2019 年 6 月进行检测,丹麦中部地区(风险>1:300 且 NT 在 3.0-3.4mm 之间)于 2015 年 9 月至 2018 年 12 月进行检测。

结果

共有 522 例胎儿被转介进行有创性检测和染色体微阵列分析。荟萃分析表明,13.5%(95%CI 8.2%-21.5%)的胎儿被诊断出染色体异常。在这些异常病例中,47/68(69%)涉及 21、18 和 13 三体,所有 NIPT 方法都有可能检测到。错过(亚)微染色体异常的剩余风险取决于 NIPT 方法,如果仅对常见三体-1:21 进行 NIPT(1:21(95%CI 3.2%-7.3%)),则风险最高。然而,如果提供全基因组分辨率为 10Mb 的 NIPT 测试,则该风险可能会大大降低(~1:464)。

结论

基于这些数据,我们建议将 NT 的侵入性检测截止值设为 3.0mm(而不是 3.5mm),因为染色体异常的风险为 1:7.4。如果首先为女性提供 NIPT,则会出现明显的诊断延迟,因为所有异常的 NIPT 结果都需要通过诊断性检测来确认。如果女性已经接受了正常的 NIPT 结果,则取决于 NIPT 方法,其他非常见三体的染色体异常的剩余风险为 1:21 至 1:464,应予以提高。如果孕妇拒绝进行有创性检测,但仍希望进行具有更广泛临床意义的检测,则可建议进行全基因组>10Mb 分辨率的 NIPT 检测,该检测可检测到大多数异常。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e1e/7318216/2eac635ebfb2/AOGS-99-765-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e1e/7318216/2eac635ebfb2/AOGS-99-765-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e1e/7318216/2eac635ebfb2/AOGS-99-765-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Nuchal translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an indication for NIPT or microarray? Cohort analysis and literature review.颈项透明层厚度为 3.0-3.4 毫米时是否需要进行 NIPT 或微阵列检测?队列分析及文献复习。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):765-774. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13877. Epub 2020 May 12.
2
Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide study of prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT.孕早期联合筛查与非典型染色体畸变的侵入性诊断:丹麦全国范围内关于产前特征及检测与无创产前检测对比的研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;64(4):470-479. doi: 10.1002/uog.27667. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
3
Is Nuchal Translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an Indication for cfDNA Testing or Microarray? - A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.颈项透明层厚度为 3.0-3.4 毫米是否需要进行 cfDNA 检测或微阵列检测?——一项多中心回顾性临床队列研究。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024;51(5):453-462. doi: 10.1159/000539463. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Selection of prenatal screening with nuchal translucency > 95th centile and below 99th centile: a 4-year observational study with real-world data.颈项透明层厚度大于第 95 百分位数且小于第 99 百分位数的产前筛查选择:一项具有真实世界数据的 4 年观察性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1779-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07500-7. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
5
Enlarged NT (≥3.5 mm) in the first trimester - not all chromosome aberrations can be detected by NIPT.孕早期颈部透明带(NT)增厚(≥3.5毫米)——并非所有染色体畸变都能通过无创产前检测(NIPT)检测出来。
Mol Cytogenet. 2016 Sep 7;9(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13039-016-0279-z. eCollection 2016.
6
Clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies.超声异常妊娠中非侵入性产前检测的临床应用价值
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):721-728. doi: 10.1002/uog.17228.
7
Application of expanded noninvasive prenatal test in prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.扩展型无创产前检测在颈项透明层增厚胎儿产前诊断中的应用。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6213-6218. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1909564. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
8
Risk of Clinically Significant Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Findings in Fetuses With Nuchal Translucency From 3.0 mm Through 3.4 mm.颈项透明层厚度为 3.0 毫米至 3.4 毫米的胎儿行染色体微阵列分析的临床显著结果风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan 1;137(1):126-131. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004195.
9
Chromosomal microarray analysis versus noninvasive prenatal testing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.染色体微阵列分析与超声颈项透明层增厚胎儿的非侵入性产前检测。
J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;67(9):533-539. doi: 10.1038/s10038-022-01041-0. Epub 2022 May 17.
10
Application of non-invasive prenatal testing in screening chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies with different nuchal translucency cutoffs.无创产前检测在不同颈项透明层截断值的妊娠中筛查染色体畸变的应用。
Mol Cytogenet. 2023 Oct 28;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13039-023-00661-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to Detect Chromosomal Anomalies Not Identified by NIPT.检测无创产前检测(NIPT)未识别的染色体异常的策略。
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Apr;45(4):464-472. doi: 10.1002/pd.6755. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
2
Outcomes associated with fetal nuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mm in the first trimester.孕早期胎儿颈部透明带厚度在3.0至3.4毫米之间的相关结局。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):629-636. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15055. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
How Useful is Nuchal Translucency in Detecting Chromosomal Abnormalities Missed by Genome-Wide NIPT and What Measurement Threshold Should Be Used?

本文引用的文献

1
Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation.当前在欧洲、澳大利亚和美国使用的非侵入性产前检测:图形展示。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):722-730. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13841. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
2
TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.TRIDENT-2:荷兰全国范围内实施全基因组非侵入性产前筛查作为一级筛查检测。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
3
Is there still a role for nuchal translucency measurement in the changing paradigm of first trimester screening?
颈部透明带厚度在检测全基因组无创产前检测遗漏的染色体异常方面有多大用处,应采用何种测量阈值?
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Feb;45(2):147-154. doi: 10.1002/pd.6742. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
4
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) Results among Patients Referred to Invasive Prenatal Testing after First-Trimester Screening: A Comprehensive Cohort Study.孕早期筛查后转诊至侵入性产前检测患者的阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)结果:一项综合队列研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;14(19):2186. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192186.
5
Cytogenetically Balanced Reciprocal Translocation Could Hide Molecular Genomic Unbalances: Implications for Foetal Phenotype Correlation.细胞遗传学平衡的相互易位可能掩盖分子基因组不平衡:对胎儿表型相关性的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;14(16):1732. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161732.
6
Advancing fetal diagnosis and prognostication using comprehensive prenatal phenotyping and genetic testing.利用全面的产前表型分析和基因检测推进胎儿诊断和预后评估。
Pediatr Res. 2024 Jun 27. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03343-9.
7
Is Nuchal Translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an Indication for cfDNA Testing or Microarray? - A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.颈项透明层厚度为 3.0-3.4 毫米是否需要进行 cfDNA 检测或微阵列检测?——一项多中心回顾性临床队列研究。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024;51(5):453-462. doi: 10.1159/000539463. Epub 2024 May 31.
8
Selection of prenatal screening with nuchal translucency > 95th centile and below 99th centile: a 4-year observational study with real-world data.颈项透明层厚度大于第 95 百分位数且小于第 99 百分位数的产前筛查选择:一项具有真实世界数据的 4 年观察性研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1779-1785. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07500-7. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
Ultrasonographic Fetal Nuchal Translucency Measurements and Cytogenetic Outcomes.超声胎儿颈项透明层测量与细胞遗传学结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e243689. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3689.
10
Enhancing Fetal Anomaly Detection in Ultrasonography Images: A Review of Machine Learning-Based Approaches.增强超声图像中的胎儿异常检测:基于机器学习方法的综述
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Nov 2;8(7):519. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8070519.
颈项透明层测量在不断变化的早孕期筛查模式中是否仍有作用?
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jan;40(2):197-205. doi: 10.1002/pd.5590. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis.羊膜腔穿刺术或绒毛膜取样术后流产风险:文献系统评价和更新的荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;54(4):442-451. doi: 10.1002/uog.20353. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
5
Application of chromosomal microarray in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.染色体微阵列在颈项透明层增厚胎儿中的应用。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 May;33(10):1749-1754. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1569622. Epub 2019 Jan 27.
6
Abnormal nuchal translucency: residual risk with normal cell-free DNA screening.颈项透明层异常:游离DNA筛查正常时的残留风险
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(18):3062-3067. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1568405. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
7
Chromosomal microarray as primary diagnostic genomic tool for pregnancies at increased risk within a population-based combined first-trimester screening program.在基于人群的联合早孕期筛查计划中,对于高危妊娠,染色体微阵列作为主要的诊断性基因组工具。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):480-486. doi: 10.1002/uog.17548. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
8
ISUOG updated consensus statement on the impact of cfDNA aneuploidy testing on screening policies and prenatal ultrasound practice.国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)关于cfDNA非整倍体检测对筛查策略和产前超声实践影响的更新共识声明。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):815-816. doi: 10.1002/uog.17483.
9
Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis.亚显微染色体异常在无结构染色体异常高风险妊娠中的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):445-452. doi: 10.1002/uog.17533.
10
The influence of SNP-based chromosomal microarray and NIPT on the diagnostic yield in 10,000 fetuses with and without fetal ultrasound anomalies.基于单核苷酸多态性的染色体微阵列分析和无创产前检测对10000例有或无胎儿超声异常胎儿诊断率的影响。
Hum Mutat. 2017 Jul;38(7):880-888. doi: 10.1002/humu.23232. Epub 2017 May 30.