Suppr超能文献

新认证和更资深的普通内科医生的实践选择演变:横断面和面板比较。

Evolving Practice Choices by Newly Certified and More Senior General Internists : A Cross-Sectional and Panel Comparison.

机构信息

American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (B.M.G., J.L.V.).

Department of Medicine and The Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (J.P.S.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jul;175(7):1022-1027. doi: 10.7326/M21-4636. Epub 2022 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospital medicine has grown as a field. However, no study has examined trends in career choices by internists over the past decade.

OBJECTIVE

To measure changes in practice setting for general internists.

DESIGN

Using Medicare fee-for-service claims (2008 to 2018) and data from the American Board of Internal Medicine, practice setting types were measured annually for general internists initially certifying between 1990 and 2017.

SETTING

General internists (non-subspecializing) treating Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries.

PATIENTS

Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with at least 20 evaluation and management (E&M) visits annually.

MEASUREMENTS

Practice setting types were defined as hospitalist (>95% inpatient E&M), outpatient only (100% outpatient E&M), or mixed.

RESULTS

67 902 general internists, comprising 80% of all general internists initially certified from 1990 to 2017 ( = 84 581), were studied. From 2008 to 2018, both hospitalists and outpatient-only physicians increased as percentages of general internists (25% to 40% and 23% to 38%, respectively). This was accompanied by a 56% decline in the percentage of mixed-practice physicians (52% to 23%) as these physicians largely migrated to outpatient-only practice. By 2018, 71% of newly certified general internists practiced as hospitalists compared with only 8% practicing as outpatient-only physicians. Most (86% of hospitalists in 2013) had the same practice type 5 years later. This retention rate was similar across early career and more senior physicians (86% and 85% for the 1999 and 2012 initial certification cohorts, respectively) and for the outpatient-only practice type (95%) but was only 57% for the mixed practice type.

LIMITATION

Practice setting measurement relied only on Medicare fee-for-service claims.

CONCLUSION

Newly certified general internists are largely choosing hospital medicine as their career choice whereas more senior physicians increasingly see patients only in the outpatient setting.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

This study did not receive direct funding.

摘要

背景

医院医学作为一个领域得到了发展。然而,目前尚无研究调查内科医生在过去十年间的职业选择趋势。

目的

衡量普通内科医生的实践环境变化。

设计

利用 Medicare 按服务收费(2008 年至 2018 年)和美国内科委员会的数据,对 1990 年至 2017 年期间首次认证的普通内科医生的实践环境类型进行年度测量。

地点

治疗 Medicare 按服务收费受益人的非专科普通内科医生。

患者

年龄在 65 岁及以上,每年至少有 20 次评估和管理(E&M)就诊的 Medicare 按服务收费受益人群。

测量方法

实践环境类型定义为医院医生(超过 95%的住院 E&M)、仅门诊(100%的门诊 E&M)或混合。

结果

对 67902 名普通内科医生进行了研究,他们占 1990 年至 2017 年期间首次认证的所有普通内科医生的 80%(=84581)。从 2008 年至 2018 年,医院医生和仅门诊医生的比例均有所增加(分别为 25%至 40%和 23%至 38%)。这伴随着混合实践医生的比例下降了 56%(从 52%降至 23%),因为这些医生主要迁移到仅门诊实践。到 2018 年,71%的新认证普通内科医生作为医院医生执业,而仅 8%的医生作为仅门诊医生执业。大多数(2013 年的 86%医院医生)在 5 年后仍保持相同的实践类型。这种保留率在早期职业和更资深的医生中是相似的(分别为 1999 年和 2012 年初始认证队列的 86%和 85%),以及仅门诊实践类型(95%),但混合实践类型仅为 57%。

局限性

实践环境测量仅依赖于 Medicare 按服务收费数据。

结论

新认证的普通内科医生主要选择医院医学作为他们的职业选择,而更资深的医生则越来越多地仅在门诊环境中看诊。

主要资金来源

本研究未获得直接资金支持。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验