Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 May 17;17(5):e0268447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268447. eCollection 2022.
Smoking prevalence in several high-income countries is steadily declining but remains persistently high in 'lower' socioeconomic position (SEP) groups, contributing to inequities in morbidity and mortality. Smoking to relieve stress is a commonly endorsed motive for continued smoking; however, it remains unclear whether smoking to relieve stress has a negative impact on motivation to stop and future quit attempts and if so, whether associations are moderated by SEP. This was an observational study with cross-sectional and prospective survey data from the nationally representative Smoking Toolkit Study in England. A total of 1,135 adult smokers were surveyed at baseline, with 153 (13.5%) respondents followed up at 12 months. Respondents provided information on demographic, social and smoking characteristics. A series of multivariable logistic regression analyses was conducted. Bayes Factors (BFs) were calculated to explore non-significant associations. Smoking to relieve stress was commonly endorsed by respondents from both 'lower' (43.2% [95% CI = 39.4%, 47.0%]) and 'higher' (40.5% [95% CI = 35.9%, 45.1%]) SEP groups (p = 0.39). Smoking to relieve stress was associated with high motivation to stop at baseline (ORadj = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.03-2.12, p = 0.035) but not significantly with the odds of making a quit attempt at a 12-month follow-up, although the magnitude and direction of the effect was similar to that observed for high motivation to stop (ORadj = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.69-3.20, p = 0.3). Data were insensitive to detect moderation effects of SEP (BF = 0.90 and BF = 1.65, respectively). Smoking to relieve stress is a commonly endorsed motive and is associated with high motivation to stop but not significantly with the odds of making a quit attempt in the next 12 months, although the magnitude and direction of the effect was similar for both outcomes. There was no clear evidence of moderation by SEP, although data were insensitive to distinguish the alternative from the null hypothesis.
一些高收入国家的吸烟率稳步下降,但在社会经济地位较低的群体中仍然居高不下,这导致了发病率和死亡率的不平等。缓解压力是继续吸烟的一个常见动机;然而,目前尚不清楚缓解压力是否会对戒烟的动机和未来的戒烟尝试产生负面影响,如果有影响,那么这种关联是否会因社会经济地位而有所缓和。这是一项观察性研究,使用了来自英国全国代表性吸烟工具包研究的横断面和前瞻性调查数据。共有 1135 名成年吸烟者在基线时接受了调查,其中 153 名(13.5%)受访者在 12 个月时接受了随访。受访者提供了人口统计学、社会和吸烟特征的信息。进行了一系列多变量逻辑回归分析。贝叶斯因子(BFs)用于探索无显著关联。来自社会经济地位较低(43.2%[95%CI=39.4%,47.0%])和较高(40.5%[95%CI=35.9%,45.1%])群体的受访者都普遍认可缓解压力是吸烟的一个常见动机(p=0.39)。缓解压力是吸烟的动机与基线时戒烟的高动机相关(ORadj=1.48,95%CI=1.03-2.12,p=0.035),但与 12 个月随访时的戒烟尝试几率没有显著相关,尽管效应的大小和方向与高戒烟动机的观察结果相似(ORadj=1.49,95%CI=0.69-3.20,p=0.3)。数据对社会经济地位的调节效应不敏感(BF=0.90 和 BF=1.65,分别)。缓解压力是吸烟的常见动机,与戒烟的高动机相关,但与未来 12 个月内戒烟尝试的几率没有显著相关,尽管这两个结果的效应大小和方向相似。没有明确的证据表明社会经济地位存在调节作用,尽管数据对区分替代假设和零假设不敏感。