• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对再分配的吸引力和偏好。

Attractiveness and preferences for redistribution.

机构信息

University of Pavia, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Italy.

出版信息

Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Aug;46:101145. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101145. Epub 2022 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101145
PMID:35580529
Abstract

Using unique German survey data, we show that beauty is associated with lower support for redistribution and that attractive individuals are more likely to believe that economic success depends more on individual effort rather than external circumstances. These results are consistent with voting behavior, as we find that beauty correlates with voting for the Free Democratic Party (FDP), which historically advocates a low level of taxation. These associations do not differ by gender and remain also if household income and employment status are controlled for, suggesting that the relationship between attractiveness and political preferences is not fully explained by the beauty premium in the labor market. We test alternative channels that might drive our results, but the correlation between attractiveness and preferences for redistribution always persists. We suggest that our results might be explained by the way in which attractive individuals rationalize the advantages they get thanks to their beauty.

摘要

利用独特的德国调查数据,我们表明美丽与较低的再分配支持度相关联,而且有吸引力的个体更有可能相信经济成功更多地取决于个人努力而不是外部环境。这些结果与投票行为一致,因为我们发现美丽与投票给自由民主党(FDP)相关联,FDP 历史上主张低税收。这些关联不因性别而异,即使控制了家庭收入和就业状况也是如此,这表明吸引力和政治偏好之间的关系不能完全用劳动力市场上的美貌溢价来解释。我们测试了可能导致我们结果的其他渠道,但吸引力和再分配偏好之间的相关性始终存在。我们认为,我们的结果可能可以用有吸引力的个人通过他们的美丽来合理化他们所获得的优势的方式来解释。

相似文献

1
Attractiveness and preferences for redistribution.对再分配的吸引力和偏好。
Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Aug;46:101145. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101145. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Beauty at the ballot box: disease threats predict preferences for physically attractive leaders.美貌选票效应:疾病威胁预测人们对具有吸引力的领导人的偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2429-36. doi: 10.1177/0956797613493642. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
3
Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs.外貌吸引力对政治信仰的影响。
Politics Life Sci. 2017 Fall;36(2):3-16. doi: 10.1017/pls.2017.18.
4
Body shape preferences: associations with rater body shape and sociosexuality.体型偏好:与评价者体型和社会性别的关联。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052532. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
5
Beauty perks: Physical appearance, earnings, and fringe benefits.美貌津贴:外貌、收入和额外福利。
Econ Hum Biol. 2020 Aug;38:100889. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100889. Epub 2020 May 17.
6
Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?投票意向与选择:选民总是理性且经过深思熟虑的吗?
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148643. eCollection 2016.
7
Brahmin Left versus Merchant Right? Education, class, multiparty competition, and redistribution in Western Europe.婆罗门左派与商人右派?西欧的教育、阶级、多党竞争与再分配。
Br J Sociol. 2021 Jan;72(1):79-92. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12834. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution.
Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):845-875. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
More than self-interest: Why different classes have different attitudes to income inequality.超越自身利益:不同阶层对收入不平等持有不同态度的原因。
Br J Sociol. 2020 Sep;71(4):594-607. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12747. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers.逃税信号对再分配和投票偏好的影响:来自“巴拿马文件”的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 10;15(3):e0229394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229394. eCollection 2020.