• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution.
Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):845-875. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Redistribution and beliefs about the source of income inequality.收入不平等来源的重新分配与观念
Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):876-901. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09733-8. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
3
Collective religiosity and the gender gap in attitudes towards economic redistribution in 86 countries, 1990-2008.1990 - 2008年86个国家的集体宗教信仰与经济再分配态度上的性别差异
Soc Sci Res. 2016 May;57:17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.01.009. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
4
The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.政治性别差距:预测投票行为的面部推断中的性别偏见。
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003666. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
5
Attractiveness and preferences for redistribution.对再分配的吸引力和偏好。
Econ Hum Biol. 2022 Aug;46:101145. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2022.101145. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
7
Median voter dynamics in a laboratory experiment on voting over redistribution.关于再分配投票的实验室实验中的中位选民动态
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Mar;111:102869. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102869. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
8
Doing the Right Thing? The Voting Power Effect and Institutional Shareholder Voting.做正确的事?表决权效应与机构股东投票
J Bus Ethics. 2023;183(4):1089-1112. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05108-y. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
9
Why are Women More Religious than Men? Do Risk Preferences and Genetic Risk Predispositions Explain the Gender Gap?为什么女性比男性更笃信宗教?风险偏好和遗传风险倾向能解释这种性别差异吗?
J Sci Study Relig. 2020 Jun;59(2):289-310. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12657. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
10
How Candidates' Age and Gender Predict Voter Preference in a Hypothetical Election.候选人的年龄和性别如何预测假设选举中的选民偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jun;32(6):934-943. doi: 10.1177/0956797620977518. Epub 2021 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality.偏好的性别差异与经济发展和性别平等的关系。
Science. 2018 Oct 19;362(6412). doi: 10.1126/science.aas9899.
2
Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance.公平与不平等接受度的发展。
Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1176-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1187300.

Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution.

作者信息

Ranehill Eva, Weber Roberto A

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Economics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):845-875. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8
PMID:35673601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9165268/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

There is substantial evidence that women tend to support different policies and political candidates than men. Many studies also document gender differences in a variety of important preference dimensions, such as risk-taking, competition and pro-sociality. However, the degree to which differential voting by men and women is related to these gaps in more basic preferences requires an improved understanding. We conduct an experiment in which individuals in small laboratory "societies" repeatedly vote for redistribution policies and engage in production. We find that women vote for more egalitarian redistribution and that this difference persists with experience and in environments with varying degrees of risk. This gender voting gap is accounted for partly by both gender gaps in preferences and by expectations regarding economic circumstances. However, including both these controls in a regression analysis indicates that the latter is the primary driving force. We also observe policy differences between male- and female-controlled groups, though these are substantially smaller than the mean individual differences-a natural consequence of the aggregation of individual preferences into collective outcomes.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8.

摘要