Suppr超能文献

可接受的皮肤致敏物表面限值(ASLs)源自局部淋巴结试验(LLNA):BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 值及其与已知致敏强度信息的关系。

Acceptable surface limits (ASLs) of skin sensitizers derived from the local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values and their relationships to known sensitization potency information.

机构信息

Chemicals Assessment and Research Center, Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Appl Toxicol. 2022 Oct;42(10):1723-1730. doi: 10.1002/jat.4339. Epub 2022 May 22.

Abstract

Skin sensitization is an extremely important risk factor for occupational health and safety, and it would be desirable to set health-based exposure limits (HBELs) for the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) based on the skin sensitizing potencies of chemical. We attempted to set acceptable surface limits (ASLs) as HBELs for skin sensitizers in the workplace based on the local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values. To calculate the ASLs, a safety assessment factor (SAF) value of 6, based on the EC1.6 values/human repeat insult patch test (HRIPT) NOEL ratios, a SAF value of 10, and a SAF value of 3 were applied, referring to previous literatures on SAFs for skin sensitization QRA, and the composite SAF was calculated as 180. The ASLs (mg/100 cm ) derived thus for 33 chemicals ranged from 0.001 to 10.417. Comparison of the ranges with known human sensitization potency classes and GHS subcategories revealed that use of GHS Category 1A chemicals needs to be controlled to ensure surface residue levels of less than 1 mg/100 cm . To minimize sensitization risks, a quantitative sensitization risk assessment method for chemicals and appropriate risk management are necessary. This report provides a potentially useful ASL-based method of managing sensitization risk derived from LLNA: BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 values, comparison of the ASLs and known human sensitization potency data showed that GHS subcategorization results would be a primary information notifying ASL ranges to be required for minimizing the sensitization risk.

摘要

皮肤致敏是职业健康和安全的一个极其重要的风险因素,如果能根据化学物质的皮肤致敏强度为定量风险评估 (QRA) 设置基于健康的接触限值 (HBEL),将是非常理想的。我们试图根据局部淋巴结检测 (LLNA):BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 值,为工作场所的皮肤致敏剂设定可接受的表面限值 (ASL) 作为 HBEL。为了计算 ASL,我们采用了三种安全评估因子 (SAF) 值,分别为基于 EC1.6 值/人体重复刺激斑贴试验 (HRIPT)NOEL 比值的 6、基于 SAF 值的 10 和基于 SAF 值的 3,参考了关于皮肤致敏 QRA 的 SAF 值的先前文献,并将复合 SAF 计算为 180。由此得出的 33 种化学物质的 ASL(mg/100cm )范围为 0.001 至 10.417。将这些范围与已知的人类致敏强度类别和 GHS 亚类进行比较表明,需要控制 GHS 类别 1A 化学品的使用,以确保表面残留水平低于 1mg/100cm 。为了最大限度地降低致敏风险,有必要对化学品进行定量致敏风险评估并采取适当的风险管理措施。本报告提供了一种基于 LLNA:BrdU-ELISA EC1.6 值的潜在有用的管理致敏风险的 ASL 方法,ASL 与已知的人类致敏强度数据的比较表明,GHS 亚分类结果将是主要信息,通知需要为最小化致敏风险而设定的 ASL 范围。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验