Gehrke C W, Kuo K C, Kaiser F E, Zumwalt R W
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1987 Jan-Feb;70(1):160-70.
This presentation describes amino acid analysis with the gas chromatographic method and experimental conditions using the N-trifluoroacetyl n-butyl ester derivatives; the study we describe here was undertaken to compare gas chromatographic (GC) and ion-exchange chromatographic (IEC) analyses of amino acids in hydrolysates of 9 diverse sample types to gain insight into effects of these 2 chromatographic methods of analysis on variation in amino acid results. Our study showed that values for samples prepared by 2 separate laboratories using the same procedure were generally in good agreement when all of the hydrolysates were analyzed by a single laboratory using a single method of analysis. To compare results from gas chromatography with those from ion-exchange chromatography analyses were performed by 2 different laboratories on the same hydrolysates and on different hydrolysates prepared by the same method by both laboratories. The data demonstrate that GC and IEC can be expected to yield essentially identical results when applied to the same hydrolysate. Agreement is so close that interlaboratory differences in hydrolysate preparation of the same sample contribute as much to variation in amino acid results as does the method of analysis, a fact which should be noted in planning collaborative studies.
本报告介绍了使用N-三氟乙酰正丁酯衍生物的气相色谱法进行氨基酸分析及实验条件;我们开展此项研究的目的是比较气相色谱(GC)法和离子交换色谱(IEC)法对9种不同样品类型水解产物中氨基酸的分析,以深入了解这两种色谱分析方法对氨基酸分析结果差异的影响。我们的研究表明,当所有水解产物由单个实验室采用单一分析方法进行分析时,由两个独立实验室按照相同程序制备的样品的值通常具有良好的一致性。为了比较气相色谱法与离子交换色谱法的结果,两个不同实验室对相同的水解产物以及两个实验室均采用相同方法制备的不同水解产物进行了分析。数据表明,当应用于相同的水解产物时,预计GC和IEC会产生基本相同的结果。两者的一致性非常接近,以至于同一样品水解产物制备过程中的实验室间差异对氨基酸结果差异的影响与分析方法的影响一样大,这一事实在规划协作研究时应予以注意。