• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干细胞研究中的角色与责任:一项针对干细胞研究人员和患者的焦点小组研究。

Roles and responsibilities in stem cell research: a focus group study with stem cell researchers and patients.

机构信息

Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508, GA, The Netherlands.

Department of Human Genetics & Interdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Dr. John T. Macdonald Foundation, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 3310, USA.

出版信息

Regen Med. 2022 Jul;17(7):445-459. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0019. Epub 2022 May 17.

DOI:10.2217/rme-2022-0019
PMID:35582744
Abstract

The perspectives of researchers and patients regarding roles and responsibilities in stem cell research are rarely studied, but these could offer insights about responsible research conduct. We have conducted a qualitative study consisting of focus groups with both early- (n = 7) and late-career stem cell researchers (n = 11) that are primarily based in Europe, and with Dutch patients with chronic lower back pain (n = 9). These focus groups have been analyzed thematically. Four themes were identified: 1) roles and responsibilities in the laboratory, 2) responsibilities of and toward patients and the public, 3) the role of regulation and 4) structural hurdles for responsibility. The results suggest that responsible research conduct could be improved by addressing grant application procedures, publication pressure and by providing support of dissemination activities for researchers. Responsibility in stem cell research could be enhanced by embracing open science initiatives and targeted training.

摘要

研究人员和患者对于干细胞研究中角色和责任的看法很少被研究,但这些看法可以为负责任的研究行为提供一些启示。我们进行了一项定性研究,包括在欧洲的早期(n=7)和晚期职业生涯的干细胞研究人员(n=11)的焦点小组,以及荷兰慢性下腰痛患者(n=9)的焦点小组。这些焦点小组已经进行了主题分析。确定了四个主题:1)实验室中的角色和责任,2)对患者和公众的责任,3)监管的作用,4)责任的结构障碍。结果表明,通过解决拨款申请程序、出版压力以及为研究人员提供传播活动的支持,可以改善负责任的研究行为。通过接受开放科学倡议和有针对性的培训,可以提高干细胞研究中的责任感。

相似文献

1
Roles and responsibilities in stem cell research: a focus group study with stem cell researchers and patients.干细胞研究中的角色与责任:一项针对干细胞研究人员和患者的焦点小组研究。
Regen Med. 2022 Jul;17(7):445-459. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0019. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
Relational responsibilities: Researchers perspective on current and progressive assessment criteria: A focus group study.关系责任:研究人员对当前和渐进式评估标准的看法:焦点小组研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 4;19(9):e0307814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307814. eCollection 2024.
3
Responsible innovation in stem cell research: using responsibility as a strategy.干细胞研究中的责任创新:将责任作为一种策略。
Regen Med. 2023 Mar;18(3):275-284. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0187. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
5
Eastern perspectives on roles, responsibilities and filial piety: A case study.东方视角下的角色、责任与孝道:一个案例研究。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 May;28(3):327-345. doi: 10.1177/0969733020934143. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Academic research integrity: Exploring researchers' perceptions of responsibilities and enablers.学术研究诚信:探究研究人员对责任和促进因素的认知。
Account Res. 2020 Apr;27(3):146-177. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1732824. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Evaluating public involvement in research design and grant development: Using a qualitative document analysis method to analyse an award scheme for researchers.评估公众在研究设计和资助项目制定过程中的参与情况:运用定性文献分析方法对一项面向研究人员的奖励计划进行分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 1;2:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0027-x. eCollection 2016.
8
A Qualitative Study on Experiences and Perspectives of Members of a Dutch Medical Research Ethics Committee.一项关于荷兰医学研究伦理委员会成员经历与观点的定性研究
HEC Forum. 2020 Mar;32(1):63-75. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09394-4.
9
Pharmacogenomics research involving racial classification: qualitative research findings on researchers' views, perceptions and attitudes towards socioethical responsibilities.涉及种族分类的药物基因组学研究:关于研究人员对社会伦理责任的观点、认知和态度的定性研究结果
Pharmacogenomics. 2007 Sep;8(9):1115-26. doi: 10.2217/14622416.8.9.1115.
10
Roles and responsibilities of family physicians on geriatric health care teams: Health care team members' perspectives.家庭医生在老年医疗保健团队中的角色与职责:医疗保健团队成员的观点。
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Nov;53(11):1954-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Drug Delivery Integrated with Regenerative Medicine: Innovations, Challenges, and Future Frontiers.药物递送与再生医学整合的进展:创新、挑战与未来前沿。
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Apr 1;17(4):456. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17040456.
2
From responsibility to responsibilization in stem cell research: An ethical framework.从干细胞研究中的责任到责任化:一个伦理框架。
Stem Cell Reports. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):102389. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.102389. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
3
Exploring the dimensions of responsible research systems and cultures: a scoping review.
探索负责任的研究体系与文化的维度:一项范围综述
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jan 17;11(1):230624. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230624. eCollection 2024 Jan.