• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
From responsibility to responsibilization in stem cell research: An ethical framework.从干细胞研究中的责任到责任化：一个伦理框架。
Stem Cell Reports. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):102389. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.102389. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Responsible innovation in stem cell research: using responsibility as a strategy.干细胞研究中的责任创新：将责任作为一种策略。
Regen Med. 2023 Mar;18(3):275-284. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0187. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Unfinished business: ongoing ethical exceptionalism in the oversight of human pluripotent stem cell research in Canada.未竟之事：加拿大人类多能干细胞研究监管中的持续伦理例外主义。
Account Res. 2012;19(1):13-26. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2012.638595.
4
Responsibility rewarded: ethics, engagement, and scientific autonomy in the labyrinth of the minotaur.责任的回报：在米诺陶洛斯迷宫中的伦理、参与和科学自治。
Neuron. 2011 May 26;70(4):577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.009.
5
Stem-cell tourism and scientific responsibility. Stem-cell researchers are in a unique position to curb the problem of stem-cell tourism.干细胞旅游与科学责任。干细胞研究人员在遏制干细胞旅游问题方面处于独特地位。
EMBO Rep. 2011 Sep 30;12(10):992-5. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.156.
6
Recognizing the ethical implications of stem cell research: A call for broadening the scope.认识到干细胞研究的伦理含义：呼吁扩大研究范围。
Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):1656-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
The Ethical Challenges of Socially Responsible Science.社会责任科学的伦理挑战。
Account Res. 2016;23(1):31-46. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608.
8
Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research.科学家在纳米技术研究中的伦理义务和社会责任。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Feb;22(1):111-32. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9637-1. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
9
The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers. An ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects.医学研究人员的辅助护理职责。关于研究人员对其研究对象应尽临床护理责任的伦理框架。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Jan-Feb;34(1):25-33.
10
Professional Ethics of Software Engineers: An Ethical Framework.软件工程师的职业道德：一种道德框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):417-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9665-x. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-Driven Quality Monitoring and Control in Stem Cell Cultures: A Comprehensive Review.干细胞培养中人工智能驱动的质量监测与控制：全面综述
Biotechnol J. 2025 Aug;20(8):e70100. doi: 10.1002/biot.70100.

本文引用的文献

1
Critical considerations for public engagement in stem cell-related research.公众参与干细胞相关研究的关键考量因素。
Stem Cell Reports. 2023 Feb 14;18(2):420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
Mending the gaps: ethically sensitive cells and the evolution of European stem cell policy.弥合差距：伦理敏感细胞与欧洲干细胞政策的演变。
Regen Med. 2022 Aug;17(8):581-595. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0043. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Roles and responsibilities in stem cell research: a focus group study with stem cell researchers and patients.干细胞研究中的角色与责任：一项针对干细胞研究人员和患者的焦点小组研究。
Regen Med. 2022 Jul;17(7):445-459. doi: 10.2217/rme-2022-0019. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
Recognizing the ethical implications of stem cell research: A call for broadening the scope.认识到干细胞研究的伦理含义：呼吁扩大研究范围。
Stem Cell Reports. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):1656-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Responsibility beyond design: Physicians' requirements for ethical medical AI.超越设计的责任：医生对医疗 AI 的伦理要求。
Bioethics. 2022 Feb;36(2):162-169. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12887. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
6
Research integrity: nine ways to move from talk to walk.研究诚信：从空谈走向行动的九种方法。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7829):358-360. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8.
7
Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.研究人员对负责任研究氛围的看法：一项多焦点组研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3017-3036. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00256-8. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
8
Ethical development of stem-cell-based interventions.基于干细胞的干预措施的伦理发展。
Nat Med. 2019 Jul;25(7):1037-1044. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0511-6. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
9
Insights and Best Practices for Planning and Implementing Patient Advisory Boards.规划和实施患者咨询委员会的见解与最佳实践
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Jul;52(4):469-473. doi: 10.1177/2168479017720475. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
A blueprint for the next generation of ELSI research, training, and outreach in regenerative medicine.再生医学领域下一代伦理、法律和社会问题（ELSI）研究、培训及推广的蓝图。
NPJ Regen Med. 2017 Jul 5;2:21. doi: 10.1038/s41536-017-0026-z. eCollection 2017.

从干细胞研究中的责任到责任化：一个伦理框架。

From responsibility to responsibilization in stem cell research: An ethical framework.

作者信息

Assen Lars S, Bredenoord Annelien L, Isasi Rosario, Fabbri Morris A, Tryfonidou Marianna A, Jongsma Karin R

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of IQ Health, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 8500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Philosophy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Stem Cell Reports. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):102389. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.102389. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.102389
PMID:39793575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11864129/
Abstract

Adopting a responsibilization approach can further improve the ethical conduct of stem cell (SC) research and applications. This approach helps align new and existing solutions for ethical implications by focusing on equipping SC researchers with the knowledge, skills, and organizational arrangements to take (co-)responsibility for the socio-ethical implications of their research.

摘要

采用责任化方法可以进一步改善干细胞研究与应用的伦理行为。这种方法通过专注于为干细胞研究人员提供知识、技能和组织安排，使其对自身研究的社会伦理影响承担（共同）责任，从而有助于协调针对伦理问题的新的和现有的解决方案。