Suppr超能文献

数字素养与动机思维:数字自我效能感的力量。

Numeracy and the Motivational Mind: The Power of Numeric Self-efficacy.

作者信息

Peters Ellen, Shoots-Reinhard Brittany

机构信息

Center for Science Communication Research, School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

Psychology Department, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2022 Aug;42(6):729-740. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221099904. Epub 2022 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Objective numeracy appears to support better medical decisions and health outcomes. The more numerate generally understand and use numbers more and make better medical decisions, including more informed medical choices. Numeric self-efficacy-an aspect of subjective numeracy that is also known as numeric confidence-also relates to decision making via emotional reactions to and inferences from experienced difficulty with numbers and via persistence linked with numeric comprehension and healthier behaviors over time. Furthermore, it moderates the effects of objective numeracy on medical outcomes.

PURPOSE

We briefly review the numeracy and decision-making literature and then summarize more recent literature on 3 separable effects of numeric self-efficacy. Although dual-process theories can account for the generally superior decision making of the highly numerate, they have neglected effects of numeric self-efficacy. We discuss implications for medical decision-making (MDM) research and practice. Finally, we propose a modification to dual-process theories, adding a "motivational mind" to integrate the effects of numeric self-efficacy on decision-making processes (i.e., inferences from experienced difficulty with numbers, greater persistence, and greater use of objective-numeracy skills) important to high-quality MDM.

CONCLUSIONS

The power of numeric self-efficacy (confidence) has been little considered in MDM, but many medical decisions and behaviors require persistence to be successful over time (e.g., comprehension, medical-recommendation adherence). Including numeric self-efficacy in research and theorizing will increase understanding of MDM and promote development of better decision interventions.

HIGHLIGHTS

Research demonstrates that objective numeracy supports better medical decisions and health outcomes.The power of numeric self-efficacy (aka numeric confidence) has been little considered but appears critical to emotional reactions and inferences that patients and others make when encountering numeric information (e.g., in decision aids) and to greater persistence in medical decision-making tasks involving numbers.The present article proposes a novel modification to dual-process theory to account for newer findings and to describe how numeracy mechanisms can be better understood.Because being able to adapt interventions to improve medical decisions depends in part on having a good theory, future research should incorporate numeric self-efficacy into medical decision-making theories and interventions.

摘要

背景

客观数字能力似乎有助于做出更好的医疗决策并带来更好的健康结果。数字能力较强的人通常更能理解和运用数字,做出更好的医疗决策,包括做出更明智的医疗选择。数字自我效能感——主观数字能力的一个方面,也被称为数字信心——也通过对数字体验困难的情绪反应和推理,以及随着时间推移与数字理解和更健康行为相关的坚持,与决策制定相关联。此外,它调节客观数字能力对医疗结果的影响。

目的

我们简要回顾数字能力与决策制定的文献,然后总结关于数字自我效能感三个可分离效应的最新文献。尽管双加工理论可以解释数字能力较强者通常更优的决策制定,但它们忽略了数字自我效能感的影响。我们讨论对医疗决策研究和实践的启示。最后,我们对双加工理论提出一种修正,增加一个“动机思维”来整合数字自我效能感对决策过程(即对数字体验困难的推理、更强的坚持以及对客观数字能力技能的更多运用)的影响,这些过程对高质量医疗决策很重要。

结论

数字自我效能感(信心)在医疗决策中的作用很少被考虑,但许多医疗决策和行为需要长期坚持才能成功(例如理解、遵循医疗建议)。在研究和理论构建中纳入数字自我效能感将增进对医疗决策的理解,并促进更好决策干预措施的发展。

要点

研究表明客观数字能力有助于做出更好的医疗决策并带来更好的健康结果。数字自我效能感(又名数字信心)的作用很少被考虑,但它似乎对患者及其他人在遇到数字信息(如在决策辅助工具中)时的情绪反应和推理至关重要,并对涉及数字的医疗决策任务中的更强坚持至关重要。本文对双加工理论提出一种新颖的修正,以解释新发现并描述如何能更好地理解数字能力机制。由于能够调整干预措施以改善医疗决策部分取决于拥有一个好的理论,未来研究应将数字自我效能感纳入医疗决策理论和干预措施中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验