University of Montana, Missoula.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2443703. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43703.
Prior studies associate late-life community disadvantage with worse brain health. It is relatively unknown if childhood community disadvantage associates with late-life brain health.
To test associations between childhood residence in an economically disadvantaged community, individual income and education, and late-life cortical brain volumes and white matter integrity.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study was conducted in the ongoing harmonized cohorts KHANDLE (Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences Study; initiated 2017) and STAR (Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans; initiated 2018) using all available data collected out of a regional integrated health care delivery network in California between cohort initiation and analysis initiation in June 2023. Eligible participants were Kaiser Permanente Northern California member ages 65 years or older. Data were analyzed between June and November 2023.
Residence at birth was geocoded and linked to historical Area Deprivation Indices (ADI). ADI is a nationally ranked percentile; community disadvantage was defined as ADI of 80 or higher.
Regional brain volumes and white matter integrity measures were derived from a random subset of participants who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging. Models adjusted for race and ethnicity, sex, and parental education.
Of a total 2161 individuals in the combined cohort, 443 individuals were eligible for imaging (mean [SD] age, 76.3 [6.5] years; 253 female [57.1%]; 56 Asian [12.6%], 212 Black [47.9%], 67 Latino [15.1%], 109 White [24.6%]). Imaging participants had a mean (SD) 15.0 (2.5) years of education, and 183 (41.3%) earned $55 000 to $99 999 annually. Fifty-four participants (12.2%) resided in a disadvantaged childhood community. Childhood community disadvantage was associated with smaller gray matter volumes overall (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.10 cm3) and in the cerebellum (-0.39 cm3; 95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 cm3), hippocampus (-0.37 cm3; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.04 cm3), and parietal cortex (-0.25 cm3; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.04 cm3) and larger mean lateral ventricle (0.44 cm3; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.74 cm3), third ventricle (0.28 cm3; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.55 cm3), and white matter hyperintensity volume (0.31 cm3; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.56 cm3). Educational attainment and late-life income did not mediate these associations.
In this cohort study of racially and ethnically diverse health plan members, childhood community disadvantage was associated with worse late-life brain health independent of individual socioeconomic status. Future work should explore alternative pathways (eg, cardiovascular health) that may explain observed associations.
先前的研究表明,晚年的社区劣势与较差的大脑健康有关。相对未知的是,童年时期的社区劣势是否与晚年的大脑健康有关。
测试童年时期居住在经济劣势社区、个人收入和教育程度与晚年皮质脑容量和白质完整性之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究在正在进行的协调队列 KHANDLE(凯撒健康老龄化和多样化生活经验研究;2017 年启动)和 STAR(非裔美国人健康老龄化研究;2018 年启动)中进行,使用了加利福尼亚州一个地区综合医疗保健提供网络中在 2023 年 6 月队列启动和分析启动之间收集的所有可用数据。符合条件的参与者是 Kaiser Permanente Northern California 年满 65 岁或以上的会员。数据在 2023 年 6 月至 11 月之间进行分析。
出生时的住所进行了地理编码并与历史区域贫困指数(ADI)相关联。ADI 是一个全国排名的百分比;社区劣势定义为 ADI 为 80 或更高。
从参加了 3T 磁共振成像的随机参与者中得出了区域脑容量和白质完整性测量值。模型调整了种族和民族、性别和父母教育程度。
在联合队列的 2161 名个体中,有 443 名个体符合成像条件(平均[标准差]年龄,76.3[6.5]岁;253 名女性[57.1%];56 名亚洲人[12.6%],212 名黑人[47.9%],67 名拉丁裔[15.1%],109 名白人[24.6%])。成像参与者的平均(标准差)接受了 15.0(2.5)年的教育,183 人(41.3%)年收入为 55000 美元至 99999 美元。54 名参与者(12.2%)居住在贫困的童年社区。童年社区劣势与整体灰质体积较小有关(-0.39cm3;95%CI,-0.65 至-0.10cm3),与小脑有关(-0.39cm3;95%CI,-0.66 至-0.09cm3),与海马体有关(-0.37cm3;95%CI,-0.68 至-0.04cm3)和顶叶皮层有关(-0.25cm3;95%CI,-0.46 至-0.04cm3),与平均侧脑室较大有关(0.44cm3;95%CI,0.12 至 0.74cm3),第三脑室较大(0.28cm3;95%CI,0.03 至 0.55cm3)和白质高信号体积较大(0.31cm3;95%CI,0.06 至 0.56cm3)。教育程度和晚年收入并不能调解这些关联。
在这项针对种族和民族多样化健康计划成员的队列研究中,童年时期的社区劣势与晚年的大脑健康较差有关,与个人社会经济地位无关。未来的工作应该探索可能解释观察到的关联的替代途径(例如,心血管健康)。