Unitat de Psicologia Medica, Departament de Medicina, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Institute of Biomedical Research August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Sep;43(13):4103-4115. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25905. Epub 2022 May 18.
How the brain represents gender identity is largely unknown, but some neural differences have recently been discovered. We used an intrinsic ignition framework to investigate whether there are gender differences in the propagation of neural activity across the whole-brain and within resting-state networks. Studying 29 trans men and 17 trans women with gender incongruence, 22 cis women, and 19 cis men, we computed the capability of a given brain area in space to propagate activity to other areas (mean-ignition), and the variability across time for each brain area (node-metastability). We found that both measurements differentiated all groups across the whole brain. At the network level, we found that compared to the other groups, cis men showed higher mean-ignition of the dorsal attention network and node-metastability of the dorsal and ventral attention, executive control, and temporal parietal networks. We also found higher mean-ignition values in cis men than in cis women within the executive control network, but higher mean-ignition in cis women than cis men and trans men for the default mode. Node-metastability was higher in cis men than cis women in the somatomotor network, while both mean-ignition and node-metastability were higher for cis men than trans men in the limbic network. Finally, we computed correlations between these measurements and a body image satisfaction score. Trans men's dissatisfaction as well as cis men's and cis women's satisfaction toward their own body image were distinctively associated with specific networks in each group. Overall, the study of the whole-brain network dynamical complexity discriminates gender identity groups, functional dynamic approaches could help disentangle the complex nature of the gender dimension in the brain.
大脑如何表现性别认同在很大程度上是未知的,但最近发现了一些神经差异。我们使用内在点火框架来研究整个大脑和静息状态网络中神经活动的传播是否存在性别差异。我们研究了 29 名性别认同障碍的跨性别男性和 17 名跨性别女性、22 名顺性别女性和 19 名顺性别男性,计算了给定大脑区域向其他区域传播活动的能力(平均点火),以及每个大脑区域随时间的变化(节点 metastability)。我们发现这两个测量值在整个大脑中都能区分所有组。在网络层面,我们发现与其他组相比,顺性别男性的背侧注意网络的平均点火和背侧、腹侧注意、执行控制和颞顶叶网络的节点 metastability 更高。我们还发现,顺性别男性的执行控制网络内的平均点火值高于顺性别女性,但顺性别女性的平均点火值高于顺性别男性和跨性别男性的默认模式。顺性别男性的节点 metastability 高于顺性别女性的躯体运动网络,而顺性别男性的平均点火和节点 metastability 都高于跨性别男性的边缘网络。最后,我们计算了这些测量值与身体形象满意度评分之间的相关性。跨性别男性的不满以及顺性别男性和女性对自己身体形象的满意与每个群体中特定的网络明显相关。总的来说,全脑网络动态复杂性的研究可以区分性别认同群体,功能动态方法可以帮助解开大脑中性别维度的复杂性质。