Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):1423-1431. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2076899.
A well-balanced curriculum is critical for ensuring that students graduate with the necessary skills. There is growing interest in evaluating the functional value of non-clinical courses compared to clinical courses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the views of optometry and vision science professionals on the utility and relevance of optics-based courses.
A web-based survey was designed to assess the perceived significance of the optics-based courses. All respondents were alumni of two universities in Jordan that offer an undergraduate degree in optometry. The survey included questions about the professional relevance of optics courses. Respondents were asked to rate several statements related to the relevance and importance of optics courses in current optometry practice on a 5-point Likert scale.
In total, 205 respondents completed the online survey. There were 161 (78.5%) women and 44 (21.5%) men, with an average age of 28.76 (± 4.86) years. Overall, respondents rated the perceived usefulness of optics courses for their careers with a mean collective value of 20.78 out of a possible 30 points. Female alumni perceived the courses as significantly more useful in their workplace than male alumni did ( = .020). Optometrists in different age groups perceived usefulness differently ( = .001). Alumni who preferred to learn these courses on-site and by hybrid methods perceived optics courses as significantly more useful than those who preferred to learn online ( = .006 and < .001, respectively).
The perceived importance of optics-based courses varied according to several factors. However, in general, these courses were deemed helpful in terms of curricular content and practical relevance to practice, regardless of specialisation or the workplace.Key messagesIn terms of the value offered to the professional competencies that an optometrist needs, the practical utility of optics courses in optometry curriculums is contested.Optometrists' perceptions of optics courses were examined using a cross-sectional survey.Respondents rated the perceived usefulness of optics courses for their career, with a mean collective value of 20.78 out 30 points.The highest percentage of respondents in this study expressed their preference for the face-to-face learning method rather than the hybrid method.Male optometrists perceived learning optics courses as significantly less helpful than female optometrists.
为确保学生毕业时具备必要的技能,平衡的课程至关重要。人们越来越感兴趣的是评估非临床课程与临床课程相比的功能价值。本研究的目的是评估视光学和视觉科学专业人员对基于光学课程的实用性和相关性的看法。
设计了一项基于网络的调查,以评估基于光学的课程的感知重要性。所有受访者均为约旦两所提供视光学本科学位的大学的校友。该调查包括有关光学课程与专业相关性的问题。受访者被要求在 5 分李克特量表上对与当前视光实践中光学课程的相关性和重要性相关的几个陈述进行评分。
共有 205 名受访者完成了在线调查。其中 161 名(78.5%)为女性,44 名(21.5%)为男性,平均年龄为 28.76(±4.86)岁。总体而言,受访者对光学课程对其职业的有用程度进行了评分,平均总分为 30 分中的 20.78 分。女性校友认为这些课程在工作场所比男性校友更有用( = .020)。不同年龄组的验光师对有用性的看法不同( = .001)。更喜欢现场和混合方法学习这些课程的校友认为光学课程明显更有用( = .006 和 < .001,分别)。
基于课程的课程的重要性因多种因素而异。然而,总的来说,这些课程在课程内容和对实践的实际相关性方面都被认为是有帮助的,无论专业或工作场所如何。
就视光课程为视光师专业能力提供的价值而言,视光学课程在视光课程中的实际效用存在争议。
本研究采用横断面调查检查视光师对光学课程的看法。
受访者对光学课程对其职业的有用程度进行了评分,平均总分为 30 分中的 20.78 分。
本研究中最大比例的受访者表示他们更喜欢面对面的学习方法,而不是混合方法。
男性视光师认为学习光学课程的帮助明显小于女性视光师。