Suppr超能文献

那他克莫司联合标准化治疗与单纯标准化治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy and safety of fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus standardized treatment alone for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital No. 20 of Zhaowuda Road, Hohhot, 010017, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.

出版信息

Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022 Jun;10(3):e00972. doi: 10.1002/prp2.972.

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common type of stroke. Fingolimod is a sphingosine analog that acts on sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors (S1PR). Recently, the safety and efficacy of fingolimod in both patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and patients with AIS have been investigated in proof-of-concept trials. In this review, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod for AIS. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We searched for publications on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinical trials, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, CBM up to August 2021. We compiled five studies; a main meta-analysis forest plots were conducted for the values of the proportion of patients whose modified Rankin scale (MRS) score was 0-1 at day 90. There were heterogeneities in each study; the method of sensitivity analysis was performed. A sensitivity analysis was performed with a mean difference (MD) of the efficacy of fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus standardized treatment alone. Random effect model is used for meta-analysis regardless of the I index. The analysis was carried out for categorical variables using the risk ratio (RR), LogRR, and its 95% CI. The methodological quality of each randomized controlled trial (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias (ROB). A meta-analysis of five studies with 228 participants was conducted. The risk ratio of patients whose MRS score was 0-1 at day 90 between fingolimod plus standardized treatment and standardized treatment alone was 2.59 (95%CI, 1.48-4.56). The Fingolimod plus standard treatment group decreased infarct growth and improved clinical function than the standard treatment.

摘要

急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)是最常见的脑卒中类型。芬戈莫德是一种鞘氨醇类似物,作用于鞘氨醇-1-磷酸受体(S1PR)。最近,在概念验证试验中已经研究了芬戈莫德在脑出血患者和 AIS 患者中的安全性和疗效。在本综述中,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估芬戈莫德治疗 AIS 的疗效和安全性。本研究按照 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)声明进行。我们在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册、临床试验、CNKI、万方数据、VIP、CBM 上搜索了截至 2021 年 8 月的出版物。我们共纳入了 5 项研究;进行了主要荟萃分析森林图,以评估第 90 天改良 Rankin 量表(MRS)评分 0-1 分的患者比例。每个研究均存在异质性;进行了敏感性分析。采用标准化治疗加芬戈莫德与单纯标准化治疗的疗效的均数差值(MD)进行敏感性分析。无论 I 指数如何,均采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。采用风险比(RR)、LogRR 及其 95%CI 对分类变量进行分析。根据 Cochrane 协作工具评估每个随机对照试验(RCT)的偏倚风险(ROB),对其进行方法学质量评估。对 5 项共 228 名参与者的研究进行了荟萃分析。第 90 天 MRS 评分 0-1 分的患者,芬戈莫德加标准化治疗与标准化治疗相比的风险比为 2.59(95%CI,1.48-4.56)。与标准治疗相比,芬戈莫德加标准治疗组梗死灶扩大减少,临床功能改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验