West Rebecca L, Otto Quentin, Drennan Ian R, Rudd Sarah, Böttiger Bernd W, Parnia Sam, Soar Jasmeet
Anaesthetics Department, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Sunnybrook Centre for Prehospital Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Resusc Plus. 2022 May 9;10:100241. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100241. eCollection 2022 Jun.
There are increasing numbers of reports of cognitive activity, consciousness, awareness and recall related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and interventions such as the use of sedative and analgesic drugs during CPR.
This scoping review aims to describe the available evidence concerning CPR-related cognitive activity, consciousness, awareness and recall and interventions such as the use of sedative and analgesic drugs during CPR.
A literature search was conducted of Medline, Embase and CINAHL from inception to 21 October 2021. We included case studies, observational studies, review studies and grey literature.
We identified 8 observational studies including 40,317 patients and 464 rescuers, and 26 case reports including 33 patients. The reported prevalence of CPR-induced consciousness was between 0.23% to 0.9% of resuscitation attempts, with 48-59% of experienced professional rescuers surveyed estimated to have observed CPR-induced consciousness. CPR-induced consciousness is associated with professional rescuer CPR, witnessed arrest, a shockable rhythm, increased return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and survival to hospital discharge when compared to patients without CPR-induced consciousness. Few studies of sedation for CPR-induced consciousness were identified. Although local protocols for treating CPR-induced consciousness exist, there is no widely accepted guidance.
CPR-related cognitive activity, consciousness, awareness and recall is uncommon but increasingly reported by professional rescuers. The data available was heterogeneous in nature and not suitable for progression to a systematic review process. Although local treatment protocols exist for management of CPR-induced consciousness, there are no widely accepted treatment guidelines. More studies are required to investigate the management of CPR-induced consciousness.
与心肺复苏(CPR)以及诸如在心肺复苏期间使用镇静和镇痛药物等干预措施相关的认知活动、意识、觉醒和回忆的报告数量日益增多。
本范围综述旨在描述有关心肺复苏相关的认知活动、意识、觉醒和回忆以及诸如在心肺复苏期间使用镇静和镇痛药物等干预措施的现有证据。
对Medline、Embase和CINAHL从创刊至2021年10月21日进行文献检索。我们纳入了病例研究、观察性研究、综述研究和灰色文献。
我们确定了8项观察性研究,包括40317名患者和464名救援人员,以及26篇病例报告,包括33名患者。报告的心肺复苏诱导意识的发生率在复苏尝试的0.23%至0.9%之间,据调查有48%-59%的经验丰富的专业救援人员估计观察到了心肺复苏诱导意识。与没有心肺复苏诱导意识的患者相比,心肺复苏诱导意识与专业救援人员进行的心肺复苏、目击心脏骤停、可电击心律、自主循环恢复(ROSC)增加以及存活至出院有关。几乎没有发现关于对心肺复苏诱导意识进行镇静的研究。尽管存在治疗心肺复苏诱导意识的当地方案,但没有广泛接受的指南。
与心肺复苏相关的认知活动、意识、觉醒和回忆并不常见,但专业救援人员报告的越来越多。现有数据性质各异,不适合推进到系统综述过程。尽管存在管理心肺复苏诱导意识的当地治疗方案,但没有广泛接受的治疗指南。需要更多研究来调查心肺复苏诱导意识的管理。