• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 2015-2018 年与结直肠癌控制计划合作的 355 家诊所对循证干预措施的采用情况。

Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018.

机构信息

University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Dr South, A2-125 CHS, Box 956900, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6900. E-mail:

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 May 19;19:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210258.

DOI:10.5888/pcd19.210258
PMID:35588522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9165474/
Abstract

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

Colorectal cancer screening rates remain suboptimal in the US. The Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seeks to increase screening in health system clinics through implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and supporting activities (SAs). This program provided an opportunity to assess the uptake of EBIs and SAs in 355 clinics that participated from 2015 to 2018.

INTERVENTION APPROACH

The 30 funded awardees of CRCCP partnered with clinics to implement at least 2 of 4 EBIs that CDC prioritized (patient reminders, provider reminders, reducing structural barriers, provider assessment and feedback) and 4 optional strategies that CDC identified as SAs (small media, professional development and provider education, patient navigation, and community health workers).

EVALUATION METHODS

Clinics completed 3 annual surveys to report uptake, implementation, and integration and perceived sustainability of the priority EBIs and SAs.

RESULTS

In our sample of 355 clinics, uptake of 4 EBIs and 2 SAs significantly increased over time. By year 3, 82% of clinics implemented patient reminder systems, 88% implemented provider reminder systems, 82% implemented provider assessment and feedback, 76% implemented activities to reduce structural barriers, 51% implemented provider education, and 84% used small media. Most clinics that implemented these strategies (>90%) considered them fully integrated into the health system or clinic operations and sustainable by year 3. Fewer clinics used patient navigation (30%) and community health workers (19%), with no increase over the years of the study.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

Clinics participating in the CRCCP reported high uptake and perceived sustainability of EBIs that can be integrated into electronic medical record systems but limited uptake of patient navigation and community health workers, which are uniquely suited to reduce cancer disparities. Future research should determine how to promote uptake and assess cost-effectiveness of CRCCP interventions.

摘要

目的和目标

美国的结直肠癌筛查率仍然不理想。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的结直肠癌控制计划(CRCCP)旨在通过实施基于证据的干预措施(EBIs)和支持活动(SAs),在卫生系统诊所中增加筛查率。该计划为评估 2015 年至 2018 年期间参与的 355 家诊所采用 EBI 和 SA 的情况提供了机会。

干预方法

CRCCP 的 30 个资助获得者与诊所合作,实施了 CDC 优先考虑的 4 项 EBI 中的至少 2 项(患者提醒、医生提醒、减少结构障碍、医生评估和反馈)和 CDC 确定的 4 项可选策略作为 SAs(小媒体、专业发展和医生教育、患者导航和社区卫生工作者)。

评估方法

诊所完成了 3 次年度调查,以报告优先 EBI 和 SAs 的采用、实施、整合和可持续性的感知。

结果

在我们的 355 家诊所样本中,4 项 EBI 和 2 项 SAs 的采用率随着时间的推移显著增加。到第 3 年,82%的诊所实施了患者提醒系统,88%的诊所实施了医生提醒系统,82%的诊所实施了医生评估和反馈,76%的诊所实施了减少结构障碍的活动,51%的诊所实施了医生教育,84%的诊所使用了小媒体。大多数实施这些策略的诊所(>90%)认为它们在第 3 年已完全融入医疗系统或诊所运营,并具有可持续性。较少的诊所使用患者导航(30%)和社区卫生工作者(19%),而且多年来没有增加。

对公共卫生的影响

参与 CRCCP 的诊所报告了可集成到电子病历系统中的 EBI 的高采用率和可持续性感知,但对患者导航和社区卫生工作者的采用率有限,而这两者特别适合减少癌症差异。未来的研究应该确定如何促进采用,并评估 CRCCP 干预措施的成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/9165474/b86b1ba03a19/PCD-19-E26s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/9165474/b86b1ba03a19/PCD-19-E26s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d21/9165474/b86b1ba03a19/PCD-19-E26s01.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018.评估 2015-2018 年与结直肠癌控制计划合作的 355 家诊所对循证干预措施的采用情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 May 19;19:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210258.
2
Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.2009-2015 年,癌症控制项目受赠者对基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的采用和实施情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E139. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180682.
3
Characterizing clinics with differential changes in the screening rate in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.描述疾病预防控制中心结直肠癌控制项目中筛查率差异变化的诊所特征。
Cancer. 2021 Apr 1;127(7):1049-1056. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33325. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Implementing Mailed Colorectal Cancer Fecal Screening Tests in Real-World Primary Care Settings: Promising Implementation Practices and Opportunities for Improvement.在真实初级保健环境中实施邮寄结直肠癌粪便筛查检测:有前景的实施实践和改进机会。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):124-135. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01496-3. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
Colorectal Cancer Control Program grantees' use of evidence-based interventions.结直肠癌控制项目资助者对循证干预措施的使用。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.010.
6
Factors That Support Sustainability of Health Systems Change to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Clinics: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study.支持卫生系统可持续性变革以增加初级保健诊所结直肠癌筛查的因素:一项纵向定性研究。
Health Promot Pract. 2023 Jul;24(4):755-763. doi: 10.1177/15248399221091999. Epub 2022 May 18.
7
Assessment of training and technical assistance needs of Colorectal Cancer Control Program Grantees in the U.S.美国结直肠癌控制项目受助者的培训及技术援助需求评估
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 31;15:49. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1386-1.
8
Factors that support readiness to implement integrated evidence-based practice to increase cancer screening.支持准备实施基于证据的综合实践以提高癌症筛查率的因素。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 6;3(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00347-6.
9
Examining the Sustainability of Core Capacity and Evidence-Based Interventions for FIT-Based CRC Screening: California Colorectal Cancer Control Program.基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查的核心能力和循证干预措施的可持续性研究:加利福尼亚州结直肠癌控制计划。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241255218. doi: 10.1177/10732748241255218.
10
Correlates of colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care clinics serving low income, medically underserved populations.为低收入、医疗服务不足人群提供服务的基层医疗诊所中结直肠癌筛查率的相关因素。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105774. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105774. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the effectiveness of implementation strategies to improve liver and colon cancer screening for Veterans: protocol for a large cluster-randomized implementation study.比较改善退伍军人肝癌和结肠癌筛查实施策略的有效性:一项大型整群随机实施研究的方案
Implement Sci. 2025 Aug 9;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01448-1.
2
Characterizing screening champions in the center for disease control and prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).对疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制项目(CRCCP)中的筛查倡导者进行特征描述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 29;6(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00759-0.
3
Closing Editorial: Colorectal Cancer-A Molecular Genetics Perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
2
Evidence-Based Interventions and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: The Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, 2015-2017.基于证据的干预措施与结直肠癌筛查率:结直肠癌筛查计划,2015-2017 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):402-409. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Implementing a multilevel intervention to accelerate colorectal cancer screening and follow-up in federally qualified health centers using a stepped wedge design: a study protocol.
闭幕社论:结直肠癌——分子遗传学视角
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Nov 24;25(23):12604. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312604.
4
The Contribution of Implementation Evaluation to the Field of Public Health.实施评估对公共卫生领域的贡献。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Nov 2;20:E98. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230323.
5
Implementation of evidence-based primary cancer prevention interventions in MA community health centers: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.马萨诸塞州社区卫生中心基于证据的原发性癌症预防干预措施的实施:一项解释性序列混合方法研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Aug 24;4(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00483-7.
6
Twenty years of capacity building across the cancer prevention and control research network.癌症防控研究网络 20 年能力建设。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01690-2. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
Implementation of evidence-based primary cancer prevention interventions in MA community health centers: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study.马萨诸塞州社区卫生中心基于证据的原发性癌症预防干预措施的实施:一项解释性序列混合方法研究。
Res Sq. 2023 Feb 20:rs.3.rs-2588180. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2588180/v1.
采用阶梯式楔形设计在联邦合格健康中心实施多层次干预以加速结直肠癌筛查和随访:研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2020 Oct 29;15(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01045-4.
4
Economic impact of clinical decision support interventions based on electronic health records.基于电子健康记录的临床决策支持干预的经济影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 15;20(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05688-3.
5
Role of an Implementation Economics Analysis in Providing the Evidence Base for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.实施经济学分析在为增加结直肠癌筛查提供证据基础方面的作用。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jun 25;17:E46. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190407.
6
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.2020 年结直肠癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
Assessing the implementation of a patient navigation intervention for colonoscopy screening.评估结肠镜筛查患者导航干预措施的实施情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4601-4.
8
Patient navigator reported patient barriers and delivered activities in two large federally-funded cancer screening programs.患者导航员在两个大型联邦资助的癌症筛查项目中报告了患者的障碍并开展了相关活动。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105858. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105858. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
9
Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.2009-2015 年,癌症控制项目受赠者对基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的采用和实施情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E139. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180682.
10
Patient Navigation in Cancer: The Business Case to Support Clinical Needs.癌症患者导航:支持临床需求的商业案例。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov;15(11):585-590. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00230. Epub 2019 Sep 11.