• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的干预措施与结直肠癌筛查率:结直肠癌筛查计划,2015-2017 年。

Evidence-Based Interventions and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: The Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, 2015-2017.

机构信息

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):402-409. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.002
PMID:33994253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11008572/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention administers the Colorectal Cancer Control Program to increase colorectal cancer screening rates among people aged 50-75 years in areas where rates are lower than state or national levels. The aim of this study is to better understand the effectiveness of specific Colorectal Cancer Control Program components.

METHODS

The study population included clinics enrolled in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program during Years 1 and 2. Clinic data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention annually from 2015 to 2017 for program evaluation were used. The outcome variable was screening rate change through Program Year 2, and predictor variables were a new implementation or enhancement of evidence-based interventions and other program components. The analysis, conducted in 2020, used ordinary least square and generalized estimating equations regressions and first difference models to estimate the associations of independent variables with the outcome.

RESULTS

Of the total 336 clinics, 50%-70% newly implemented or enhanced different evidence-based interventions. Among these, client reminders were most highly associated with the increase in screening rates (8.0 percentage points). Provider reminder was not significantly associated with any change in screening rates. Among all program components, having a colorectal cancer screening champion was most highly (8.4 percentage points) associated with screening rate change. Results from different models were slightly different but in agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Client reminders, provider assessment and feedback, and colorectal cancer screening champions were associated with increased clinic-level colorectal cancer screening rates. Universal implementation of these strategies can substantially increase colorectal cancer screening rates in the U.S.

摘要

简介

疾病控制与预防中心管理结直肠癌防控计划,以提高 50-75 岁人群的结直肠癌筛查率,这些人群所在地区的结直肠癌筛查率低于州或国家水平。本研究旨在更好地了解特定结直肠癌防控计划组成部分的有效性。

方法

研究人群包括在第 1 年和第 2 年参与结直肠癌防控计划的诊所。疾病预防控制中心每年从 2015 年到 2017 年收集的用于计划评估的诊所数据被用于本研究。结果变量是到项目第 2 年的筛查率变化,预测变量是新实施或增强的基于证据的干预措施和其他项目组成部分。分析于 2020 年进行,使用普通最小二乘法和广义估计方程回归以及一阶差分模型来估计独立变量与结果之间的关联。

结果

在总共 336 家诊所中,有 50%-70%的诊所新实施或增强了不同的基于证据的干预措施。在这些诊所中,患者提醒与筛查率的增加最相关(8.0 个百分点)。提供者提醒与筛查率的任何变化均无显著关联。在所有项目组成部分中,拥有结直肠癌筛查冠军与筛查率变化的相关性最高(8.4 个百分点)。来自不同模型的结果略有不同,但一致。

结论

患者提醒、提供者评估和反馈以及结直肠癌筛查冠军与增加诊所层面的结直肠癌筛查率相关。这些策略的普遍实施可以在美国显著提高结直肠癌的筛查率。

相似文献

1
Evidence-Based Interventions and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates: The Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, 2015-2017.基于证据的干预措施与结直肠癌筛查率:结直肠癌筛查计划,2015-2017 年。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):402-409. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
Correlates of colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care clinics serving low income, medically underserved populations.为低收入、医疗服务不足人群提供服务的基层医疗诊所中结直肠癌筛查率的相关因素。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105774. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105774. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
Characterizing clinics with differential changes in the screening rate in the Colorectal Cancer Control Program of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.描述疾病预防控制中心结直肠癌控制项目中筛查率差异变化的诊所特征。
Cancer. 2021 Apr 1;127(7):1049-1056. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33325. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018.评估 2015-2018 年与结直肠癌控制计划合作的 355 家诊所对循证干预措施的采用情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 May 19;19:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210258.
5
Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.2009-2015 年,癌症控制项目受赠者对基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的采用和实施情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Oct 10;16:E139. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.180682.
6
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
7
Use of Evidence-Based Interventions to Address Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening.使用基于证据的干预措施来解决结直肠癌筛查中的差异。
MMWR Suppl. 2016 Feb 12;65(1):21-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6501a5.
8
Assessing Levels and Correlates of Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study With Federally Qualified Health Centers.评估结直肠癌筛查循证方法的实施水平及相关因素:一项基于联邦合格健康中心的横断面研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2018 Dec;45(6):1008-1015. doi: 10.1177/1090198118778333. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
9
Colorectal Cancer Control Program grantees' use of evidence-based interventions.结直肠癌控制项目资助者对循证干预措施的使用。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov;45(5):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.010.
10
Small media and client reminders for colorectal cancer screening: current use and gap areas in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.小型媒体和客户端提醒在结直肠癌筛查中的应用:美国疾病预防控制中心结直肠癌控制项目中的当前使用和差距领域。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E131. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110317. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Promising approaches to support sustained colorectal cancer screening promotion strategies in primary care clinics.在基层医疗诊所支持持续性结直肠癌筛查推广策略的可行方法。
Prev Oncol Epidemiol. 2025 Jun;3(1):2512477. doi: 10.1080/28322134.2025.2512477.
2
Characterizing screening champions in the center for disease control and prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).对疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制项目(CRCCP)中的筛查倡导者进行特征描述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 29;6(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00759-0.
3
Evaluation of Perceptual Realism and Clinical Plausibility of AI-Generated Colon Polyp Images.人工智能生成的结肠息肉图像的感知真实度和临床可信度评估。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 26;13(7):1561. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071561.
4
Sustainability of evidence based interventions implemented in CDC's colorectal cancer control program.疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)结直肠癌控制项目中实施的循证干预措施的可持续性。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jul 9;6(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00734-9.
5
Estimating the long-term health impact and program cost-effectiveness of providing direct screening services to low-income, medically underserved patients through the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).通过结直肠癌控制项目(CRCCP)为低收入、医疗服务不足的患者提供直接筛查服务,评估其对长期健康的影响以及项目的成本效益。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-01994-5.
6
Role of Community-Clinical Partnerships to Promote Cancer Screening: Lessons Learned From the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.社区-临床合作关系在促进癌症筛查中的作用:从国家乳腺癌和宫颈癌早期检测项目中吸取的经验教训。
Health Promot Pract. 2024 Dec 23:15248399241303891. doi: 10.1177/15248399241303891.
7
Mi-CARE: Comparing Three Evidence-Based Interventions to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening among Ethnic Minorities within Three Different Clinical Contexts.美加爱护航:在三种不同临床环境下,比较三种循证干预措施在少数民族群体中促进结直肠癌筛查的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 10;20(22):7049. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227049.
8
Twenty years of capacity building across the cancer prevention and control research network.癌症防控研究网络 20 年能力建设。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01690-2. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
9
Evaluating Uptake of Evidence-Based Interventions in 355 Clinics Partnering With the Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2015-2018.评估 2015-2018 年与结直肠癌控制计划合作的 355 家诊所对循证干预措施的采用情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 May 19;19:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210258.
10
Cross-sectional survey study of primary care clinics on evidence-based colorectal cancer screening intervention use.基于证据的结直肠癌筛查干预使用的基层医疗诊所横断面调查研究。
J Rural Health. 2022 Sep;38(4):845-854. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12631. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Deaths: Final Data for 2017.死亡:2017年最终数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(9):1-77.
2
Vital Signs: Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Use - United States, 2018.生命体征:2018 年美国结直肠癌筛查检测使用情况。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Mar 13;69(10):253-259. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6910a1.
3
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
4
Correlates of colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care clinics serving low income, medically underserved populations.为低收入、医疗服务不足人群提供服务的基层医疗诊所中结直肠癌筛查率的相关因素。
Prev Med. 2019 Sep;126:105774. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105774. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
5
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估旨在提高美国结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637.
6
Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Care Systems Using Evidence-Based Interventions.利用循证干预措施在医疗保健系统中增加结直肠癌筛查
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Aug 9;15:E100. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180029.
7
Inside help: An integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation.内部助力:对医疗保健相关实施中的倡导者的综合综述
SAGE Open Med. 2018 May 17;6:2050312118773261. doi: 10.1177/2050312118773261. eCollection 2018.
8
Planning a national-level data collection protocol to measure outcomes for the Colorectal Cancer Control Program.规划一项国家级数据收集方案,以衡量结直肠癌控制项目的成果。
J Ga Public Health Assoc. 2016 Fall;6(2 Suppl):292-297. doi: 10.21633/jgpha.6.2s16.
9
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
10
A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.实施策略的精准汇编:实施变革专家建议(ERIC)项目的成果
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.