Suppr超能文献

中国和澳大利亚 1990 年至 2019 年肺癌死亡率的年龄-时期-队列分析。

Age-period-cohort analysis of lung cancer mortality in China and Australia from 1990 to 2019.

机构信息

National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100050, China.

School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 May 19;12(1):8410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12483-z.

Abstract

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer death in China and Australia, the countries with different socioenvironmental contexts in the Western Pacific Region. Comparing the age-period-cohort effect on LC mortality (LCM) between the two countries can help plan interventions and draw lessons for countries in the region. We collected LCM estimates between 1990 and 2019 from the GBD 2019. Age-period-cohort modelling was applied to compute the net drift, local drift, cross-sectional age curve, longitudinal age curve, and the rate ratios (RRs) of period and cohort. China had a higher LC age-standardized mortality rate than Australia in 2019 (men: 58.10 [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 46.53, 70.89] vs. 30.13 [95% UI: 27.88, 32.31]/100,000 population; women: 22.86 [95% UI: 18.52, 27.52] vs. 17.80 [95% UI: 15.93, 19.34]/100,000 population). Period and cohort effects on LCM improved more markedly among Australian men (RR for period effect, from 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41, 1.53] to 0.79 [95% CI 0.75, 0.84]; RR for cohort effect, from 2.56 [95% CI 2.44, 2.68] to 0.36 [95% CI 0.11, 1.18]) and Chinese women (RR for period effect, from 1.06 [95% CI 1.01, 1.11] to 0.85 [95% CI 0.82, 0.89]; RR for cohort effect, from 0.71 [95% CI 0.65, 0.78] to 0.51 [95% CI 0.26, 1.03]) during the study period and birth cohort. The LCM in Chinese population aged 65 to 79 and Australian women aged 75 to 79 increased. Smoking and particulate matter (PM) contributed most to LCM in China, while smoking and occupational carcinogens contributed most in Australia. Decreasing period and cohort risks for LCM attributable to smoking and PM were more remarkable in Australia than in China. The LCM attributable to occupational carcinogens was higher in Australia than in China, particularly for those aged 60 to 79. Vigorous tobacco and PM control, which brought a substantial decline in LCM in Australia, may help reduce LCM in China. Australia should highlight LC prevention among people with occupational exposure. Chinese aged ≥ 65 and Australian women aged ≥ 75 should be the priorities for LC interventions.

摘要

肺癌(LC)是中国和澳大利亚这两个在西太平洋地区具有不同社会环境背景的国家癌症死亡的主要原因。比较两国之间肺癌死亡率(LCM)的年龄-时期-队列效应,有助于为该地区的国家制定干预措施并吸取经验教训。我们从 GBD 2019 中收集了 1990 年至 2019 年期间的 LCM 估计数。应用年龄-时期-队列模型来计算净漂移、局部漂移、横断面年龄曲线、纵向年龄曲线和时期和队列的比率(RR)。2019 年,中国的 LC 年龄标准化死亡率高于澳大利亚(男性:58.10 [95%不确定区间(UI):46.53,70.89] 与 30.13 [95% UI:27.88,32.31]/100000 人口;女性:22.86 [95% UI:18.52,27.52] 与 17.80 [95% UI:15.93,19.34]/100000 人口)。中国男性(时期效应 RR,从 1.47 [95%置信区间(CI)1.41,1.53] 到 0.79 [95% CI 0.75,0.84];队列效应 RR,从 2.56 [95% CI 2.44,2.68] 到 0.36 [95% CI 0.11,1.18])和中国女性(时期效应 RR,从 1.06 [95% CI 1.01,1.11] 到 0.85 [95% CI 0.82,0.89];队列效应 RR,从 0.71 [95% CI 0.65,0.78] 到 0.51 [95% CI 0.26,1.03])的时期和出生队列效应在研究期间更为显著。中国 65 至 79 岁人群和澳大利亚 75 至 79 岁女性的 LCM 增加。在中国,吸烟和颗粒物(PM)对 LCM 的贡献最大,而在澳大利亚,吸烟和职业性致癌物质对 LCM 的贡献最大。与吸烟和 PM 相关的 LCM 的时期和队列风险下降在澳大利亚比在中国更为显著。澳大利亚的职业性致癌物质导致的 LCM 归因风险高于中国,尤其是 60 至 79 岁人群。在中国,强有力的烟草和 PM 控制措施大大降低了 LCM,这可能有助于降低中国的 LCM。澳大利亚应强调针对有职业暴露人群的 LC 预防。中国≥65 岁和澳大利亚≥75 岁的女性应成为 LC 干预的重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e654/9120450/2b3ace810519/41598_2022_12483_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验