Franzetti Jessica, Volpe Stefania, Catto Valentina, Conte Edoardo, Piccolo Consiglia, Pepa Matteo, Piperno Gaia, Camarda Anna Maria, Cattani Federica, Andreini Daniele, Tondo Claudio, Jereczek-Fossa Barbara Alicja, Carbucicchio Corrado
Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 3;9:849201. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849201. eCollection 2022.
The purpose of this study is to collect available evidence on the feasibility and efficacy of stereotactic arrhythmia radio ablation (STAR), including both photon radiotherapy (XRT) and particle beam therapy (PBT), in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), and to provide cardiologists and radiation oncologists with a practical overview on this topic.
Three hundred and thirty-five articles were identified up to November 2021 according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses criteria; preclinical and clinical studies were included without data restrictions or language limitations. Selected works were analyzed for comparing target selection, treatment plan details, and the accelerator employed, addressing workup modalities, acute and long-term side-effects, and efficacy, defined either by the presence of scar or by the absence of AF recurrence.
Twenty-one works published between 2010 and 2021 were included. Seventeen studies concerned XRT, three PBT, and one involved both. Nine studies (1 and 8 ; doses ranging from 15 to 40 Gy) comprised a total of 59 animals, 12 (8 , 4 ; doses ranging from 16 to 50 Gy) focused on humans, with 9 patients undergoing STAR: average follow-up duration was 5 and 6 months, respectively. Data analysis supported efficacy of the treatment in the preclinical setting, whereas in the context of clinical studies the main favorable finding consisted in the detection of electrical scar in 4/4 patients undergoing specific evaluation; the minimum dose for efficacy was 25 Gy in both humans and animals. No acute complication was recorded; severe side-effects related to the long-term were observed only for very high STAR doses in 2 animals. Significant variability was evidenced among studies in the definition of target volume and doses, and in the management of respiratory and cardiac target motion.
STAR is an innovative non-invasive procedure already applied for experimental treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. Particular attention must be paid to safety, rather than efficacy of STAR, given the benign nature of AF. Uncertainties persist, mainly regarding the definition of the treatment plan and the role of the target motion. In this setting, more information about the toxicity profile of this new approach is compulsory before applying STAR to AF in clinical practice.
本研究旨在收集关于立体定向心律失常放射消融(STAR)(包括光子放疗(XRT)和粒子束治疗(PBT))治疗心房颤动(AF)的可行性和疗效的现有证据,并为心脏病学家和放射肿瘤学家提供关于该主题的实用概述。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目标准,截至2021年11月共识别出335篇文章;纳入临床前和临床研究,无数据限制或语言限制。对所选作品进行分析,以比较靶区选择、治疗计划细节和使用的加速器,探讨检查方式、急性和长期副作用以及疗效(根据瘢痕的存在或房颤复发的不存在来定义)。
纳入了2010年至2021年间发表的21篇作品。17项研究涉及XRT,3项涉及PBT,1项同时涉及两者。9项研究(1项 和8项 ;剂量范围为15至40 Gy)共涉及59只动物,12项(8项 ,4项 ;剂量范围为16至50 Gy)关注人类,有9例患者接受了STAR:平均随访时间分别为5个月和6个月。数据分析支持了该治疗在临床前环境中的疗效,而在临床研究中,主要的有利发现是在4/4例接受特定评估的患者中检测到电瘢痕;人和动物的有效最低剂量均为25 Gy。未记录到急性并发症;仅在2只动物中观察到与非常高的STAR剂量相关的严重长期副作用。各研究在靶区体积和剂量的定义以及呼吸和心脏靶区运动的管理方面存在显著差异。
STAR是一种已应用于室性心律失常实验治疗的创新性非侵入性手术。鉴于房颤的良性性质,必须特别关注STAR的安全性而非疗效。不确定性仍然存在,主要涉及治疗计划的定义和靶区运动的作用。在此背景下,在临床实践中将STAR应用于房颤之前,必须获取更多关于这种新方法毒性特征的信息。