• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康数据空间中的公民定位研究:一个案例分析。

Citizens in Search for a Place in the Digital Health Data Space: A Case Study.

机构信息

Department of Science and Technology Studies, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 16;293:127-136. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220359.

DOI:10.3233/SHTI220359
PMID:35592972
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health solutions have been omnipresent in policy agendas. However, we still need to better understand how citizens experience these developments and, more specifically, how citizens would ideally want such solutions to look like.

OBJECTIVE

We explore the needs and concerns citizens expressed in different phases of the co-creation process for a prototype of a citizen-centred health data platform within a large-scale European project: Smart4Health.

METHOD

We follow a qualitative approach in our analysis of 9 discussion groups in addition to a diverse set of 49 qualitative interviews with citizens and health care professionals.

RESULTS

We show how citizens identify the positive potential of health data infrastructures and how they relate digital health to wider developments in contemporary societies. We then outline citizens' concerns that potentially prevent them from becoming users and thus destabilize the policy vision of digital health.

CONCLUSION

Four preconditions need to be met for citizens to find their place within a digital health data environment: transparency/trust, infrastructural literacy, digital justice, and a careful consideration of the distribution of responsibilities.

摘要

背景

数字健康解决方案在政策议程中无处不在。然而,我们仍然需要更好地了解公民如何体验这些发展,更具体地说,公民希望这些解决方案理想地是什么样子。

目的

我们在一个大型欧洲项目“Smart4Health”中探索了公民在共同创造原型公民为中心的健康数据平台过程的不同阶段表达的需求和关注点。

方法

我们通过对 9 个讨论小组的分析以及对公民和医疗保健专业人员的 49 个定性访谈的多元化集合,采用定性方法进行分析。

结果

我们展示了公民如何识别健康数据基础设施的积极潜力,以及他们如何将数字健康与当代社会的更广泛发展联系起来。然后,我们概述了公民的担忧,这些担忧可能会阻止他们成为用户,从而破坏数字健康的政策愿景。

结论

要使公民在数字健康数据环境中找到自己的位置,需要满足四个前提条件:透明度/信任、基础设施素养、数字正义以及仔细考虑责任的分配。

相似文献

1
Citizens in Search for a Place in the Digital Health Data Space: A Case Study.数字健康数据空间中的公民定位研究:一个案例分析。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 May 16;293:127-136. doi: 10.3233/SHTI220359.
2
Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.公民参与使用数字工具进行 COVID-19 接触者追踪:一项探索公民观点和需求的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x.
3
[Citizen-centred health care in Germany: An analysis of expert interviews].[德国以公民为中心的医疗保健:专家访谈分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Jun;187:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 May 11.
4
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
5
Citizens' Literacy in Genomics: A Delphi Survey of Multidisciplinary Experts in the Field.公民基因组学素养:领域内多学科专家的德尔菲调查。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;13(3):498. doi: 10.3390/genes13030498.
6
Digital age: The path choice of government-citizen value co-creation.数字时代:政府-公民价值共创的路径选择
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 2;10(15):e35482. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35482. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
7
Chemical Exposure: European Citizens' Perspectives, Trust, and Concerns on Human Biomonitoring Initiatives, Information Needs, and Scientific Results.化学物质暴露:欧洲公民的观点、对人体生物监测计划的信任和担忧、信息需求和科学研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 5;18(4):1532. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041532.
8
Engaging citizens in local health policymaking. A realist explorative case-study.让公民参与地方卫生决策。一个现实主义的探索性案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 24;17(3):e0265404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265404. eCollection 2022.
9
Collaborative accountability for sustainable public health: A Korean perspective on the effective use of ICT-based health risk communication.可持续公共卫生的协作问责制:韩国对基于信息通信技术的健康风险沟通有效利用的视角
Gov Inf Q. 2019 Apr;36(2):226-236. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility: a scoping review.数字健康技术对道德责任的影响:一项范围综述
Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Mar;28(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10238-3. Epub 2024 Nov 30.