Ambulance Victoria, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Aug;37(4):535-546. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22000796. Epub 2022 May 20.
Non-physician performed point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is emerging as a diagnostic adjunct with the potential to enhance current practice. The scope of POCUS utility is broad and well-established in-hospital, yet limited research has occurred in the out-of-hospital environment. Many physician-based studies expound the value of POCUS in the acute setting as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool. This study utilized a scoping review methodology to map the literature pertaining to non-physician use of POCUS to improve success of peripheral intravenous access (PIVA), especially in patients predicted to be difficult to cannulate.
Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, and PubMed were searched from January 1, 1990 through April 15, 2021. A thorough search of the grey literature and reference lists of relevant articles was also performed to identify additional studies. Articles were included if they examined non-physician utilization of ultrasound-guided PIVA (USGPIVA) for patients anticipated to be difficult to cannulate.
A total of 158 articles were identified. A total of 16 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority of participants had varied experience with ultrasound, making accurate comparison difficult. Training and education were non-standardized, as was the approach to determining difficult intravenous access (DIVA). Despite this, the majority of the studies demonstrated high first attempt and overall success rates for PIVA performed by non-physicians.
Non-physician USGPIVA appears to be a superior method for PIVA when difficulty is anticipated. Additional benefits include reduced requirement for central venous catheter (CVC) or intraosseous (IO) needle placement. Paramedics, nurses, and emergency department (ED) technicians are able to achieve competence in this skill with relatively little training. Further research is required to explore the utility of this practice in the out-of-hospital environment.
非医师进行的即时护理超声检查(POCUS)作为一种诊断辅助手段正在兴起,具有增强当前实践的潜力。POCUS 的应用范围广泛,在医院内已经得到充分证实,但在院外环境中的研究有限。许多以医生为基础的研究阐述了 POCUS 在急性环境中作为治疗和诊断工具的价值。本研究采用范围综述方法,对涉及非医师使用 POCUS 以提高外周静脉穿刺(PIVA)成功率的文献进行了制图,尤其是在预计难以穿刺的患者中。
从 1990 年 1 月 1 日到 2021 年 4 月 15 日,检索了 Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL Plus、EMBASE 和 PubMed。还对相关文章的灰色文献和参考文献进行了全面搜索,以确定其他研究。如果文章检查了预计难以穿刺的患者的超声引导下 PIVA(USGPIVA)的非医师使用情况,则将其纳入研究。
共确定了 158 篇文章。共有 16 篇文章符合纳入标准。大多数参与者都有不同的超声使用经验,这使得准确比较变得困难。培训和教育是非标准化的,确定困难静脉穿刺(DIVA)的方法也是如此。尽管如此,大多数研究表明,非医师进行的 PIVA 的首次尝试和总体成功率都很高。
当预计会有困难时,非医师的 USGPIVA 似乎是 PIVA 的一种更好的方法。额外的好处包括减少对中心静脉导管(CVC)或骨髓内(IO)针放置的需求。护理人员、护士和急诊部(ED)技术员可以通过相对较少的培训获得这项技能的能力。需要进一步研究来探索这种实践在院外环境中的效用。