Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238293. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38293.
Posthospital contact with a primary care team is an established pillar of safe transitions. The prevailing model of telephone outreach is usually limited in scope and operationally burdensome.
To determine whether a 30-day automated texting program to support primary care patients after hospital discharge is associated with reductions in the use of acute care resources.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a difference-in-differences approach at 2 academic primary care practices in Philadelphia from January 27 through August 27, 2021. Established patients of the study practices who were 18 years or older, were discharged from an acute care hospitalization, and received the usual transitional care management telephone call were eligible for the study. At the intervention practice, 604 discharges were eligible and 430 (374 patients, of whom 46 had >1 discharge) were enrolled in the intervention. At the control practice, 953 patients met eligibility criteria. The study period, including before and after the intervention, ran from August 27, 2020, through August 27, 2021.
Patients received automated check-in text messages from their primary care practice on a tapering schedule during the 30 days after discharge. Any needs identified by the automated messaging platform were escalated to practice staff for follow-up via an electronic medical record inbox.
The primary study outcome was any emergency department (ED) visit or readmission within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes included any ED visit or any readmission within 30 days, analyzed separately, and 30- and 60-day mortality. Analyses were based on intention to treat.
A total of 1885 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [17.3] years; 1101 women [58.4%]) representing 2617 discharges (447 before and 604 after the intervention at the intervention practice; 613 before and 953 after the intervention at the control practice) were included in the analysis. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for any use of acute care resources after implementation of the intervention was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.38-0.92). The aOR for an ED visit was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.45-1.30) and for a readmission was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.23-0.86). The aORs for death within 30 and 60 days of discharge at the intervention practice were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.23-3.61) and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.21-1.85), respectively.
The findings of this cohort study suggest that an automated texting program to support primary care patients after hospital discharge was associated with significant reductions in use of acute care resources. This patient-centered approach may serve as a model for improving postdischarge care.
与初级保健团队的医院后接触是安全过渡的既定支柱。目前的电话外展模式通常在范围和操作上都受到限制。
确定在医院出院后 30 天内支持初级保健患者的 30 天自动短信计划是否与减少急性护理资源的使用有关。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究在费城的 2 个学术初级保健实践中使用了差异中的差异方法,时间为 2021 年 1 月 27 日至 8 月 27 日。有资格参加研究的是该研究实践的 18 岁或以上的成年患者,从急性护理住院出院,并接受了常规的过渡护理管理电话。在干预实践中,有 604 人符合出院条件,其中 430 人(374 名患者,其中 46 人有 >1 次出院)被纳入干预。在对照实践中,有 953 名患者符合资格标准。研究期间,包括干预前后,从 2020 年 8 月 27 日至 2021 年 8 月 27 日。
患者在出院后 30 天内,按照逐渐减少的时间表从他们的初级保健实践中收到自动签到短信。自动消息传递平台识别出的任何需求都会通过电子病历收件箱升级到实践工作人员进行跟进。
主要研究结果是出院后 30 天内任何急诊部(ED)就诊或再入院。次要结果包括任何 ED 就诊或任何 30 天内再入院,分别进行分析,以及 30 天和 60 天的死亡率。分析基于意向治疗。
共有 1885 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,63.2[17.3]岁;1101 名女性[58.4%])代表 2617 次出院(447 次在干预前,604 次在干预后在干预实践中;613 次在干预前,953 次在干预后在对照实践中)被纳入分析。实施干预后,任何急性护理资源使用的调整后优势比(aOR)为 0.59(95%CI,0.38-0.92)。ED 就诊的 aOR 为 0.77(95%CI,0.45-1.30),再入院的 aOR 为 0.45(95%CI,0.23-0.86)。干预实践中出院后 30 天和 60 天的死亡率的 aOR 分别为 0.92(95%CI,0.23-3.61)和 0.63(95%CI,0.21-1.85)。
这项队列研究的结果表明,在医院出院后支持初级保健患者的自动短信计划与急性护理资源使用的显著减少有关。这种以患者为中心的方法可能成为改善出院后护理的模式。