Suppr超能文献

语境的科学:通过现场观察改变重病护理

The Science of Context: Transforming Serious Illness Care Though In Situ Observation.

机构信息

Department of Medicine (J.M.K.), Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Department of Surgery (M.L.S), Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Jun;63(6):e651-e653. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.01.021.

Abstract

There is an expression, often attributed to Einstein, “If I had 60 minutes to save the world, I would spend the first 55 trying to figure out what was wrong with it.” Dr. J. Randall (Randy) Curtis’ approach to improving serious illness care has been so effective for exactly this reason. Before considering how to make things better, you must first understand what is happening and how we got to our current state. For critical care, that required listening to clinician and family communication —what people actually said— while it was happening in the intensive care unit (ICU). Randy’s work using rigorous observational methods helped open the doors concealing the difficult conversations between the families of critically ill patients nearing end of life and ICU clinicians. His scientific contributions have led not only to practice-changing insights and novel interventions, but also to a new generation of researchers seeking to improve serious illness care. Herein, we highlight Randy’s early work using direct observation and describe the trajectory and impact of his ground-up approach to research. In parallel, we describe the influence of his approach on our own work studying serious illness care in surgery and critical care. Although neither of us has had direct mentorship from Randy, we emulate Randy’s pioneering mentorship model in our work together, demonstrating his far-reaching influence.

摘要

有一种说法,常被归功于爱因斯坦:“如果我有 60 分钟来拯救世界,我会花 55 分钟来试图找出问题所在。”J. 兰德尔(Randy)·柯蒂斯博士之所以能如此有效地改善重病护理,正是出于这个原因。在考虑如何改进之前,您必须首先了解正在发生的事情以及我们如何达到当前状态。对于重症监护,这需要在重症监护病房(ICU)中聆听临床医生和家庭的沟通——人们实际上在说什么。兰德尔使用严格的观察方法进行的工作帮助打开了掩盖重症患者接近生命终点的家庭与 ICU 临床医生之间艰难对话的大门。他的科学贡献不仅带来了改变实践的见解和新颖的干预措施,而且还为新一代寻求改善重病护理的研究人员提供了机会。在此,我们重点介绍兰德尔早期使用直接观察的工作,并描述他从基础开始的研究方法的轨迹和影响。与此同时,我们还描述了他的方法对我们自己在外科和重症监护中研究重病护理工作的影响。尽管我们都没有直接接受过兰德尔的指导,但我们在共同工作中效仿了兰德尔开创性的指导模式,展示了他深远的影响力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Conceptualizing Qualitative Data.概念化定性数据。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Aug;31(10):1767-1770. doi: 10.1177/10497323211024951. Epub 2021 Jun 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验