Division of Cardiology, Sant'Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Cardiology Department, St. Jansdal Hospital, Harderwijk, the Netherlands; Hartdokters, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1205-1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.023. Epub 2022 May 17.
Distal radial access (DRA) has been proposed to improve procedure ergonomics and favor radial artery patency. Although promising data, nothing is known on evolving hand function after DRA.
This study sought to comprehensively evaluate hand function in patients undergoing DRA.
Real-world patients undergoing DRA undertook a thorough multimodality assessment of hand function implementing multidomain questionnaires (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Levine-Katz), and motor (pinch grip test) and sensory (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments test) examinations of both hands. All assessments were performed at preprocedural baseline and planned at 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up (FU). Adverse clinical and procedural events were documented too.
Data of 313 patients (220 men, age 66 ± 10 years) from 9 international centers were analyzed. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Levine-Katz scores slightly improved from baseline to FU (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029, respectively). Pinch strength mildly improved from baseline to FU (P < 0.001 for both the left and right hands). Similarly, touch pressure threshold appeared to faintly improve in both the left and right hands (P < 0.012 for all the sites). For both motor and sensory function tests, comparable findings were found for the DRA hand and the contralateral one, with no significant differences between them. Repeated assessment of all tests over all FU time points similarly showed lack of worsening hand function. Access-related adverse events included 19 harmless bleedings and 3 forearm radial artery and 3 distal radial artery occlusions. None affected hand function at FU.
In a systematic multidimensional assessment, DRA was not associated with hand function impairment. Moreover, DRA emerges as a safe alternative vascular access.
远端桡动脉入路(DRA)被提出以改善手术操作的舒适度并有利于桡动脉通畅。尽管有很有前景的数据,但对于 DRA 后手部功能的演变知之甚少。
本研究旨在全面评估接受 DRA 的患者的手部功能。
接受 DRA 的真实患者对手部功能进行了全面的多模态评估,采用多领域问卷(上肢功能障碍问卷、Levine-Katz 问卷)以及双手的运动(捏力测试)和感觉(Semmes-Weinstein 单丝测试)检查。所有评估均在术前基线和 1、6 和 12 个月随访(FU)时进行。还记录了不良的临床和手术事件。
来自 9 个国际中心的 313 名患者(220 名男性,年龄 66 ± 10 岁)的数据进行了分析。上肢功能障碍问卷和 Levine-Katz 评分从基线到 FU 略有改善(P = 0.008 和 P = 0.029)。捏力从基线到 FU 也略有改善(左手和右手均 P < 0.001)。同样,左手和右手的触觉压力阈值似乎也略有改善(所有部位均 P < 0.012)。对于运动和感觉功能测试,DRA 手和对侧手的发现相似,两者之间没有显著差异。所有 FU 时间点的所有测试的重复评估也表明手部功能没有恶化。与血管通路相关的不良事件包括 19 例无害性出血和 3 例前臂桡动脉和 3 例远端桡动脉闭塞。在 FU 时均未影响手部功能。
在系统的多维评估中,DRA 与手部功能障碍无关。此外,DRA 是一种安全的血管通路替代方案。