Suppr超能文献

桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉及外周手术:一项多中心经验

Distal Radial Artery Access for Coronary and Peripheral Procedures: A Multicenter Experience.

作者信息

Achim Alexandru, Kákonyi Kornél, Jambrik Zoltán, Nagy Ferenc, Tóth Julia, Sasi Viktor, Hausinger Péter, Nemes Attila, Varga Albert, Bertrand Olivier F, Ruzsa Zoltán

机构信息

2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Invasive Cardiology, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.

Medicala 1 Invasive Cardiology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", 400000 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 20;10(24):5974. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245974.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Distal radial access (dRA) has recently gained global popularity as an alternative access route for vascular procedures. Among the benefits of dRA are the low risk of entry site bleeding complications, the low rate of radial artery occlusion, and improved patient and operator comfort. The aim of this large multicenter registry was to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of dRA in a wide variety of routine procedures in the catheterization laboratory, ranging from coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention to peripheral procedures.

METHODS

The study comprised 1240 patients who underwent coronary angiography, PCI or noncoronary procedures through dRA in two Hungarian centers from January 2019 to April 2021. Baseline patient characteristics, number and duration of arterial punctures, procedural success rate, crossover rate, postoperative compression time, complications, hospitalization duration, and different learning curves were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 66.4 years, with 66.8% of patients being male. The majority of patients (74.04%) underwent a coronary procedure, whereas 25.96% were involved in noncoronary interventions. dRA was successfully punctured in 97% of all patients, in all cases with ultrasound guidance. Access site crossover was performed in 2.58% of the patients, mainly via the contralateral dRA. After experiencing 150 cases, the dRA success rate plateaued at >96%. Our dedicated dRA step-by step protocol resulted in high open radial artery (RA) rates: distal and proximal RA pulses were palpable in 99.68% of all patients at hospital discharge. The rate of minor vascular complications was low (1.5%). A threshold of 50 cases was sufficient for already skilled radial operators to establish a reliable procedural method of dRA access.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of distal radial artery access in the everyday routine of a catheterization laboratory for coronary and noncoronary interventions is feasible and safe with an acceptable learning curve.

摘要

引言

作为血管介入手术的替代入路,桡动脉远端入路(dRA)最近在全球范围内受到欢迎。dRA的优点包括穿刺部位出血并发症风险低、桡动脉闭塞率低,以及患者和术者舒适度提高。这项大型多中心注册研究的目的是证明dRA在导管室各种常规手术中的可行性和安全性,这些手术范围从冠状动脉造影、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗到外周手术。

方法

该研究纳入了2019年1月至2021年4月期间在匈牙利两个中心通过dRA接受冠状动脉造影、PCI或非冠状动脉手术的1240例患者。分析了患者的基线特征、动脉穿刺次数和持续时间、手术成功率、交叉率、术后压迫时间、并发症、住院时间以及不同的学习曲线。

结果

患者平均年龄为66.4岁,66.8%为男性。大多数患者(74.04%)接受了冠状动脉手术,而25.96%参与了非冠状动脉介入治疗。所有患者中有97%成功进行了dRA穿刺,所有病例均在超声引导下进行。2.58%的患者进行了入路部位交叉,主要通过对侧dRA。在经历150例病例后,dRA成功率稳定在>96%。我们专门的dRA逐步方案导致较高的桡动脉开放率:出院时99.68%的患者可触及远端和近端桡动脉搏动。轻微血管并发症发生率较低(1.5%)。对于已经熟练的桡动脉操作者来说,50例的阈值足以建立可靠的dRA入路手术方法。

结论

在导管室的日常工作中,将桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉和非冠状动脉介入治疗是可行且安全的,学习曲线可以接受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a804/8707635/f2af150b0f3b/jcm-10-05974-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验