• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人在祖辈照料中所面临的育儿负担和心理困扰:以中国杭州本地和外来祖辈为例的研究。

Childcare burden and psychological distress among elderly people involved in grandparenting: A study on local and migrant grandparents in Hangzhou, China.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.

Lianyungang Higher Vocational and Technical College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lianyungang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4479-e4491. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13852. Epub 2022 May 21.

DOI:10.1111/hsc.13852
PMID:35596595
Abstract

Grandparenting is known to impact psychological health in older people. However, the extent to which the effect is altered by migration-related and sociodemographic determinants is less clear. Therefore, we conducted this cross-sectional study to investigate whether the association between grandparenting and psychological distress differs between rural-urban migrants and local older adults from May to September 2019. A total of 373 rural-urban migrants and 602 local older adults involved in grandparenting in Hangzhou completed measurements assessing sociodemographic characteristics, childcare burden and psychological distress. In total, 22.2% of the grandparents reported psychological distress. Rural-urban migrant grandparents had a lower socioeconomic status (SES), a higher childcare burden (23.6 ± 9.2 vs. 20.7 ± 9.5, p < 0.001) and higher levels of psychological distress (29.8% vs. 17.4%, p < 0.001) than local grandparents. Childcare burden and pressure from adult children were the most significant predictors for psychological distress in both groups (ps < 0.05). Psychological distress was also significantly associated with self-rated health status (β = -0.276, p = 0.033) and willingness to participate in grandparenting (β = -0.659, p = 0.024) in migrant grandparents but associated with female gender (β = 0.346, p = 0.022), caring for children at night (β = 0.424, p = 0.011), conflict with adult children (β = 0.432, p < 0.001) and annual income (β = -0.237, p < 0.001) in local grandparents. Migrant status showed a statistically significant moderating effect between childcare burden and psychological distress. These results may be of assistance in comprehensively understanding the social determinants of mental health of grandparents involved in grandparenting.

摘要

隔代养育被认为会影响老年人的心理健康。然而,迁移相关和社会人口统计学决定因素对这种影响的改变程度尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了这项横断面研究,以调查在 2019 年 5 月至 9 月期间,隔代养育与心理困扰之间的关联是否因城乡移民和当地老年人而有所不同。共有 373 名城乡移民和 602 名参与隔代养育的当地老年人完成了社会人口统计学特征、育儿负担和心理困扰的测量。总共有 22.2%的祖父母报告存在心理困扰。城乡移民祖父母的社会经济地位(SES)较低(23.6±9.2 比 20.7±9.5,p<0.001),育儿负担较重(29.8%比 17.4%,p<0.001),心理困扰水平较高。育儿负担和来自成年子女的压力是两组中心理困扰的最显著预测因素(p<0.05)。心理困扰也与移民祖父母的自我评估健康状况(β=-0.276,p=0.033)和参与隔代养育的意愿(β=-0.659,p=0.024)显著相关,但与女性(β=0.346,p=0.022)、夜间照顾孩子(β=0.424,p=0.011)、与成年子女的冲突(β=0.432,p<0.001)和年收入(β=-0.237,p<0.001)相关。移民身份显示出育儿负担与心理困扰之间具有统计学意义的调节作用。这些结果可能有助于全面了解参与隔代养育的祖父母心理健康的社会决定因素。

相似文献

1
Childcare burden and psychological distress among elderly people involved in grandparenting: A study on local and migrant grandparents in Hangzhou, China.老年人在祖辈照料中所面临的育儿负担和心理困扰:以中国杭州本地和外来祖辈为例的研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4479-e4491. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13852. Epub 2022 May 21.
2
The implications of childcare on grandparents' health self-management in a Chinese elderly population.育儿对中国老年人群祖父母健康自我管理的影响。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020 Jan;35(1):280-289. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2904. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
Impacts of grandparenting on older Chinese adults' mental health: a cross-sectional study.祖父母角色对中国老年人心理健康的影响:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 13;23(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04396-x.
4
Aggressive parenting behavior among grandparents providing childcare for grandchildren: A case study of Shenzhen, China.为孙辈提供育儿服务的祖父母中的激进育儿行为:以中国深圳为例的案例研究。
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 May;139:106108. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106108. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
5
Grandparenting and subjective well-being in China: The moderating effects of residential location, gender, age, and income.隔代养育与中国老年人的主观幸福感:居住地点、性别、年龄和收入的调节作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115528. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115528. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
6
The Experience of Grandparenting Young Children.祖辈照料孙辈的经历
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2022 Apr;65(3):305-319. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2021.1965687. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
7
Longitudinal impacts of grandparent caregiving on cognitive, mental, and physical health in China.祖辈照料对中国老年人认知、心理和身体健康的纵向影响。
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Nov;25(11):2053-2060. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1856779. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
Cognitive Function Among Noncustodial Grandparents in China and the United States: A Cross-National Perspective.中美非监护祖父母的认知功能:跨国视角
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2022 Jul;95(1):18-41. doi: 10.1177/00914150211050877. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
9
Continuity and changes in grandchild care and the risk of depression for Chinese grandparents: new evidence from CHARLS.隔代照料的连续性和变化与中国祖父母抑郁风险的关系:来自 CHARLS 的新证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 3;11:1217998. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1217998. eCollection 2023.
10
Caring as curing: Grandparenting and depressive symptoms in China.关爱如治疗:祖辈养育与中国的抑郁症状。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114452. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114452. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Dyadic Associations of Parenting Stress, Family Resilience, and Coping Styles Among Parents and Grandparents in Intergenerational Co-Parenting Families.代际共同育儿家庭中父母和祖父母的育儿压力、家庭复原力及应对方式的二元关联
Nurs Res Pract. 2025 Jul 11;2025:8036580. doi: 10.1155/nrp/8036580. eCollection 2025.
2
Association between different patterns of social participation and loneliness among the Chinese older people: is there a local-migrant gap?中国老年人不同社会参与模式与孤独感之间的关联:存在本地人与外来移民的差异吗?
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05391-6.