Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
BJOG. 2022 Nov;129(12):1961-1968. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17227. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
There is increased focus on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and there are several well-established risk factors such as birthweight, instrumental delivery and median episiotomy. Some studies have found increased risk of OASI in women delivering vaginally after a previous caesarean section (VBAC).
To evaluate whether there is increased prevalence of OASI in VBAC compared with primiparous women.
Literature search using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases.
All studies with data on both primiparous women and women undergoing VBAC were included. All included studies were evaluated using the "SIGN - methodology checklist" to verify if the quality was acceptable.
This systematic review included 23 articles conducted in 11 countries over 19 years. Included studies were analysed using RevMan version 5.4.
We found increased prevalence of OASI in the VBAC group; 8.18% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.07-8.29) compared with 6.59% (95% CI 6.56-6.62) in primiparous women. Correspondingly, the meta-analysis revealed increased prevalence for OASI in the VBAC group (odds ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47). We found a high level of heterogeneity (I = 98%).
Women undergoing VBAC had a higher prevalence of OASI compared with primiparous women.
人们越来越关注产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI),并且已经确定了一些明确的危险因素,例如出生体重、器械分娩和会阴正中切开术。一些研究发现,与初次阴道分娩(VBAC)相比,先前剖宫产(VBAC)后的阴道分娩妇女发生 OASI 的风险增加。
评估 VBAC 与初产妇相比,OASI 的患病率是否增加。
使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库进行文献检索。
所有纳入研究均有初产妇和 VBAC 妇女的数据。所有纳入的研究均使用“SIGN 方法学清单”进行评估,以验证其质量是否可接受。
本系统评价纳入了 19 年来在 11 个国家进行的 23 项研究。使用 RevMan 版本 5.4 分析纳入的研究。
我们发现 VBAC 组 OASI 的患病率增加;8.18%(95%置信区间 [CI] 8.07-8.29),而初产妇为 6.59%(95% CI 6.56-6.62)。相应地,荟萃分析显示 VBAC 组 OASI 的患病率增加(比值比 1.27,95% CI 1.10-1.47)。我们发现存在高度异质性(I ² = 98%)。
与初产妇相比,VBAC 妇女 OASI 的患病率更高。