School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China; Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and Environment, Ministry of Land and Resource, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115302. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115302. Epub 2022 May 19.
With the accelerated expansion of global value chains (GVCs), China occupies an increasingly important position in the global production division system, which has important impacts for its economy and environment. Comprehensively measuring the economic benefits and emissions costs of China's participation in GVCs, and striving to achieve a mutually beneficial state of GVC upgrade and low-carbon economic development, are critical issues for China. This study applies the accounting framework of value-added trade and embodied CO emission trade to measure the potential CO emissions cost of China's value-added gains through traditional trade, simple GVC, and complex GVC from 2000 to 2014. The findings are fourfold. (1) Compared with traditional trade, GVC-related activities require higher carbon emissions costs to obtain value added, which exacerbates China's economic-environmental imbalance. (2) Electricity, Metals, and Non-metallic mineral industries are the primary sectors of embodied CO emissions exports, and they bear heavy emissions pressure while obtaining limited value added. (3) China's embodied CO trade and value-added trade with developing countries through GVCs are rising, whereas the trade with developed countries reveals a downward trend. (4) The characteristics of China's industrial paths under different trade routes vary considerably. CO emissions in the industrial path of GVC-related activities are more hidden, and comprehensive management must be carried out throughout the entire industrial chain from production to consumption. This study proposes policy recommendations for the coordinated development of economic and environmental relations, such as reducing the carbon intensity of key industries, strengthening trade cooperation with emerging economies, and enhancing China's position in GVCs.
随着全球价值链 (GVC) 的加速扩张,中国在全球生产分工体系中占据着日益重要的地位,这对中国的经济和环境都产生了重要影响。全面衡量中国参与 GVC 的经济效益和排放成本,努力实现 GVC 升级和低碳经济发展的互利共赢状态,是中国面临的关键问题。本研究运用增值贸易核算框架和隐含 CO2排放贸易框架,测算了中国 2000-2014 年通过传统贸易、简单 GVC 和复杂 GVC 获得的增值收益的潜在 CO2排放成本。研究结果有四点。(1)与传统贸易相比,GVC 相关活动获取附加值需要更高的碳排放成本,这加剧了中国经济环境的不平衡。(2)电力、金属和非金属矿物行业是隐含 CO2 排放出口的主要部门,它们在获得有限的附加值的同时承担着沉重的排放压力。(3)中国通过 GVC 与发展中国家的隐含 CO2 贸易和增值贸易不断上升,而与发达国家的贸易则呈下降趋势。(4)不同贸易路径下中国产业路径的特征差异较大。GVC 相关活动的工业路径中的 CO2 排放更为隐蔽,必须在生产到消费的整个产业链上进行全面管理。本研究为协调经济和环境关系提出了政策建议,如降低重点行业的碳强度、加强与新兴经济体的贸易合作、提升中国在 GVC 中的地位等。