• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动驾驶能否预防行人和分心行人发生碰撞?对无信号控制的道路中间横道处的运动规划的探索。

Can automated driving prevent crashes with distracted Pedestrians? An exploration of motion planning at unsignalized Mid-block crosswalks.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan.

Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Aug;173:106711. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106711. Epub 2022 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2022.106711
PMID:35598396
Abstract

Pedestrian distraction may provoke severe difficulties in automated vehicle (AV) control, which may significantly affect the safety performance of AVs, especially at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks (UMCs). However, there is no available motion-planning model for AVs that considers the effect of pedestrian distraction on UMCs. This study aims to explore innovative approaches for safe and reasonable automated driving in response to distracted pedestrians with various speed profiles at UMCs. Based on two common model design concepts, two new models are established for AVs: a rule-based model that solves motion plans through a fixed calculation procedure incorporating several optimization models, and a learning-based model that replaces the deterministic optimization process with policy-gradient reinforcement learning. The developed models were assessed through simulation experiments in which pedestrian speed profiles were defined using empirical data from field surveys. The results reveal that the learning-based model has outstanding safety performance, whereas the rule-based model leads to remarkable safety problems. For distracted pedestrians with significant crossing-speed changes, rule-based AVs lead to a 5.1% probability of serious conflict and a 1.4% crash probability. The learning-based model is oversensitive to risk and always induces high braking rates, which results in unnecessary efficiency loss. To overcome this, a hybrid model based on the learning-based model was developed, which introduces a rule-based acceleration value to regularize the action space of the proposed learning-based model. The results indicate that the hybrid approach outperforms the other two models in preventing crash hazards from distracted pedestrians by employing appropriate braking behaviors. The high safety performance of the hybrid models can be attributed to the spontaneous slowing down of the vehicle that initiates before detecting pedestrians on UMCs. Although such a cautious driving pattern leads to extra delay, the time cost of the hybrid model is acceptable considering the significant improvements in ensuring pedestrian safety.

摘要

行人分心可能会给自动驾驶汽车(AV)的控制带来严重困难,这可能会显著影响 AV 的安全性能,特别是在无信号的中央街区人行横道(UMC)处。然而,目前还没有针对考虑行人分心对 UMC 影响的 AV 运动规划模型。本研究旨在探索创新方法,以实现安全合理的自动驾驶,应对 UMC 处具有各种速度分布的分心行人。基于两种常见的模型设计概念,为 AV 建立了两个新模型:基于规则的模型,通过包含几个优化模型的固定计算程序来解决运动计划;以及基于学习的模型,用策略梯度强化学习替代确定性优化过程。通过使用实地调查的经验数据定义行人速度分布的模拟实验对开发的模型进行了评估。结果表明,基于学习的模型具有出色的安全性能,而基于规则的模型则导致显著的安全问题。对于具有明显穿越速度变化的分心行人,基于规则的 AV 导致严重冲突的概率为 5.1%,碰撞概率为 1.4%。基于学习的模型对风险过于敏感,总是导致高制动率,从而导致不必要的效率损失。为了克服这个问题,基于学习的模型开发了一种混合模型,该模型引入了基于规则的加速度值来规范所提出的基于学习的模型的动作空间。结果表明,混合方法通过采用适当的制动行为来防止分心行人造成的碰撞危险,在防止分心行人造成的碰撞危险方面优于其他两种模型。混合模型的高安全性性能可归因于车辆在 UMC 上检测到行人之前自发减速。虽然这种谨慎的驾驶模式会导致额外的延迟,但考虑到确保行人安全的显著改进,混合模型的时间成本是可以接受的。

相似文献

1
Can automated driving prevent crashes with distracted Pedestrians? An exploration of motion planning at unsignalized Mid-block crosswalks.自动驾驶能否预防行人和分心行人发生碰撞?对无信号控制的道路中间横道处的运动规划的探索。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Aug;173:106711. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106711. Epub 2022 May 19.
2
Interactions between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks considering occlusions by opposing vehicles.考虑到对向车辆遮挡,无人行横道交叉口的自主车辆与行人之间的交互作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106468. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106468. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
A cellular automaton simulation model for pedestrian and vehicle interaction behaviors at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks.用于无信号控制路段行人和车辆交互行为的元胞自动机仿真模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt B):425-437. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Observational-based study to explore pedestrian crossing behaviors at signalized and unsignalized crosswalks.基于观察的研究探索信号和无信号交叉口行人的过街行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105990. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105990. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
5
A novel agent-based framework for evaluating pedestrian safety at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks.一种用于评估无信号控制路段中央对向横道行人安全的基于agent 的新框架。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Sep;159:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106288. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
Kinematic cues in driver-pedestrian communication to support safe road crossing.驾驶员-行人交流中的运动学提示以支持安全道路穿越。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107236. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107236. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
7
Crashes involving distracted pedestrians: Identifying risk factors and their relationships to pedestrian severity levels and distraction modes.涉及分心行人的撞车事故:识别风险因素及其与行人严重程度等级和分心模式的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jan;194:107359. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107359. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
8
Investigating consecutive conflicts of pedestrian crossing at unsignalized crosswalks using the bivariate logistic approach.采用双变量逻辑回归方法研究无信号交叉口行人连续冲突。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Nov;162:106402. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106402. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
9
Quantitative analysis of pedestrian safety at uncontrolled multi-lane mid-block crosswalks in China.中国无控制多车道路段人行横道行人安全的定量分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Nov;108:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Gap acceptance probability model for pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks based on logistic regression.基于逻辑回归的无信号控制路段行人间隙接受概率模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Aug;129:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.012. Epub 2019 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Connected and Automated Vehicles.面向车联网和自动驾驶的多智能体强化学习综述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 12;23(10):4710. doi: 10.3390/s23104710.