• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

危机短信干预:评估短信发送者对有效性的感知。

Crisis text-line interventions: Evaluation of texters' perceptions of effectiveness.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Jun;52(3):583-595. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12873. Epub 2022 May 22.

DOI:10.1111/sltb.12873
PMID:35599358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9322288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Crisis Text Line (CTL), the largest provider of text-based crisis intervention services in the U.S., has answered nearly 7 million conversations since its inception in 2013. The study's objective was to assess texter's perceptions of the effectiveness of CTL crisis interventions.

METHOD

Survey data completed by 85,877 texters linked to volunteer crisis counselor (CC) reports from October 12, 2017, to October 11, 2018 were analyzed. The relationship of several effectiveness measures with texters' demographic and psychosocial characteristics, frequency of CTL usage, and texters' perceptions of engagement with their CCs was examined using a series of logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

By the end of the text-based conversation, nearly 90% of suicidal texters reported that the conversation was helpful, and nearly half reported being less suicidal.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study offers evidence for CTL's perceived effectiveness. These findings are of critical importance in light of the launch of a nationwide three-digit number (988) for suicide prevention and mental health crisis supports in the U.S., which will include texting.

摘要

目的

危机短信热线(CTL)是美国最大的基于短信的危机干预服务提供商,自 2013 年成立以来,已经回答了近 700 万次对话。本研究的目的是评估短信用户对 CTL 危机干预有效性的看法。

方法

对 2017 年 10 月 12 日至 2018 年 10 月 11 日期间与志愿者危机顾问(CC)报告相关联的 85877 名短信用户完成的调查数据进行了分析。使用一系列逻辑回归分析,研究了几个有效性衡量指标与短信用户的人口统计学和心理社会特征、CTL 使用频率以及短信用户对与 CC 互动的看法之间的关系。

结果

在基于文本的对话结束时,近 90%的有自杀倾向的短信用户报告说对话很有帮助,近一半的用户报告说自杀倾向降低了。

结论

我们的研究为 CTL 的感知有效性提供了证据。考虑到美国推出了全国性的三位数(988)自杀预防和心理健康危机支持号码,包括短信服务,这些发现至关重要。

相似文献

1
Crisis text-line interventions: Evaluation of texters' perceptions of effectiveness.危机短信干预:评估短信发送者对有效性的感知。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Jun;52(3):583-595. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12873. Epub 2022 May 22.
2
Engagement With Crisis Text Line Among Subgroups of Users Who Reported Suicidality.与报告自杀倾向的用户亚组进行危机短信热线互动。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Apr 1;71(4):319-327. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900149. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Individuals who text crisis text line: Key characteristics and opportunities for suicide prevention.发信息给危机短信热线的个人:关键特征和预防自杀的机会。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Jun;52(3):567-582. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12872. Epub 2022 May 26.
4
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline crisis chat interventions: Evaluation of chatters' perceptions of effectiveness.全国自杀预防生命线危机聊天干预:评估聊天者对有效性的看法。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Dec;51(6):1126-1137. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12795. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
5
Crisis response in Texas youth impacted by Hurricane Harvey: A difference-in-differences analysis.德克萨斯州受哈维飓风影响的青年危机应对:一项差分分析。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Aug 15;359:215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.080. Epub 2024 May 18.
6
Effect of helping suicidal people using text messaging: An evaluation of effects and best practices of the Canadian suicide prevention Service's text helpline.通过短信帮助有自杀倾向者的效果:加拿大自杀预防服务机构短信热线的效果及最佳实践评估
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Dec;52(6):1140-1148. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12908. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Safety Planning on Crisis Lines: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Perceived Helpfulness of a Brief Intervention to Mitigate Future Suicide Risk.危机热线的安全规划:一项减轻未来自杀风险的简短干预措施的可行性、可接受性和感知有用性。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Feb;50(1):29-41. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12554. Epub 2019 May 21.
8
Crisis Response and Suicidal Patterns in U.S. Youth Before and During COVID-19: A Latent Class Analysis.美国青少年在新冠疫情前后的危机应对和自杀模式:潜在类别分析。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Jan;70(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.10.003.
9
Comparative effectiveness of safety planning intervention with instrumental support calls (ISC) versus safety planning intervention with two-way text message caring contacts (CC) in adolescents and adults screening positive for suicide risk in emergency departments and primary care clinics: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.在急诊室和初级保健诊所中对筛查出有自杀风险的青少年和成年人进行安全计划干预与仪器支持电话(ISC)比较,以及安全计划干预与双向短信关怀联系(CC)的比较:一项实用随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Aug;131:107268. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107268. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
10
[Impact of the suicidal crisis intervention training program on the confidence and skills of hospital professionals in the Hauts-de-France region].[自杀危机干预培训项目对法国上法兰西大区医院专业人员信心和技能的影响]
Encephale. 2023 Oct;49(5):504-509. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2022.05.005. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Youth Crisis App Users: Mental Health Service Access and Barriers and Perceptions of Helpfulness.青少年危机应用程序用户的特征:心理健康服务的获取、障碍及对有用性的认知
JAACAP Open. 2024 Aug 28;3(3):421-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.06.006. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline (Now 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline): Evaluation of Crisis Call Outcomes for Suicidal Callers.国家预防自杀生命线(现为988自杀与危机热线):对自杀来电者危机呼叫结果的评估。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2025 Jun;55(3):e70020. doi: 10.1111/sltb.70020.
3
Predicting Satisfaction With Chat-Counseling at a 24/7 Chat Hotline for the Youth: Natural Language Processing Study.预测青少年全天候聊天热线的聊天咨询满意度:自然语言处理研究。
JMIR AI. 2025 Feb 18;4:e63701. doi: 10.2196/63701.
4
The Most Effective Interventions for Classification Model Development to Predict Chat Outcomes Based on the Conversation Content in Online Suicide Prevention Chats: Machine Learning Approach.基于在线预防自杀聊天中对话内容预测聊天结果的分类模型开发的最有效干预措施:机器学习方法。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Sep 26;11:e57362. doi: 10.2196/57362.
5
Evaluating the Experience of Teen-to-Teen Crisis Line Volunteers: A Pilot Study.评估青少年对青少年危机热线志愿者的体验:一项试点研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Oct;60(7):1422-1433. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01298-z. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
6
Tracking and Profiling Repeated Users Over Time in Text-Based Counseling: Longitudinal Observational Study With Hierarchical Clustering.基于文本的咨询中随时间跟踪和分析重复用户:使用层次聚类的纵向观察研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 30;26:e50976. doi: 10.2196/50976.
7
Crisis response in Texas youth impacted by Hurricane Harvey: A difference-in-differences analysis.德克萨斯州受哈维飓风影响的青年危机应对:一项差分分析。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Aug 15;359:215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.080. Epub 2024 May 18.
8
Short-term changes in mental health help-seeking behaviors following exposure to multiple social stressors and a natural disaster.经历多重社会压力源和自然灾害后心理健康求助行为的短期变化。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116843. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116843. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
9
The Impact of a Messenger-Based Psychosocial Chat Counseling Service on Further Help-Seeking Among Children and Young Adults: Longitudinal Study.基于信使的心理社会聊天咨询服务对儿童和青少年进一步寻求帮助的影响:纵向研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 May 17;10:e43780. doi: 10.2196/43780.
10
Cascading disasters and mental health: The February 2021 winter storm and power crisis in Texas, USA.级联灾害与心理健康:2021 年 2 月美国德克萨斯州冬季风暴和电力危机
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jul 1;880:163231. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163231. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Individuals who text crisis text line: Key characteristics and opportunities for suicide prevention.发信息给危机短信热线的个人:关键特征和预防自杀的机会。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Jun;52(3):567-582. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12872. Epub 2022 May 26.
2
Lifeline Crisis Chat: Coding form development and findings on chatters' risk status and counselor behaviors.生命线危机聊天:编码表单的开发以及聊天者风险状况和顾问行为的发现。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Jun;52(3):452-466. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12835. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
3
National Suicide Prevention Lifeline crisis chat interventions: Evaluation of chatters' perceptions of effectiveness.全国自杀预防生命线危机聊天干预:评估聊天者对有效性的看法。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Dec;51(6):1126-1137. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12795. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
4
Third-party callers to the national suicide prevention lifeline: Seeking assistance on behalf of people at imminent risk of suicide.国家自杀预防生命线的第三方来电者:代表有即刻自杀风险的人寻求援助。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022 Feb;52(1):37-48. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12769. Epub 2021 May 25.
5
Engagement With Crisis Text Line Among Subgroups of Users Who Reported Suicidality.与报告自杀倾向的用户亚组进行危机短信热线互动。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Apr 1;71(4):319-327. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900149. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
6
Crisis text patterns in youth following the release of Season 2 and celebrity suicides: A case study of summer 2018.第二季发布及名人自杀事件后青少年的危机短信模式:2018年夏季案例研究
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Oct 21;16:100999. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100999. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Psychometric properties and clinical utility of brief measures of depression, anxiety, and general distress: The PHQ-2, GAD-2, and K-6.简短的抑郁、焦虑和一般困扰测量工具的心理测量特性和临床实用性:PHQ-2、GAD-2 和 K-6。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;56:13-18. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
8
Adolescents in crisis: A geographic exploration of help-seeking behavior using data from Crisis Text Line.青少年危机:利用危机短信热线数据进行的求助行为的地理探索。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Oct;215:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.025. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
9
Follow-up with Callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: Evaluation of Callers' Perceptions of Care.全国预防自杀生命线来电者随访:来电者对关怀的认知评估。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018 Feb;48(1):75-86. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12339. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
10
"" Clients at Kids Help Phone: Individual Characteristics and Problem Topics.儿童帮助热线的客户:个体特征与问题主题
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Fall;25(3):138-144. Epub 2016 Nov 1.