Meyer Jacob D, Perkins Seana L, Brower Cassandra S, Lansing Jeni E, Slocum Julia A, Thomas Emily B K, Murray Thomas A, Lee Duck-Chul, Wade Nathaniel G
Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 4;13:799600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.799600. eCollection 2022.
Depression (DEP) is prevalent and current treatments are ineffective for many people. This pilot study's purpose was to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and plausible efficacy of an 8-week intervention employing 30 min of prescribed moderate intensity exercise ("ActiveCBT") compared to 30 min of usual activities ("CalmCBT") immediately prior to weekly online CBT sessions. Ten adults with DSM-5-diagnosed current DEP were randomized to groups and completed: an intake assessment, eight weekly CBT sessions, final assessment, and 3-month follow-up. ActiveCBT participants were prescribed 30-min of moderate exercise immediately prior to each standardized 50-min CBT session. CalmCBT participants continued with normal activities for 30 min before therapy. Questionnaires regarding DEP symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), between-session effectiveness (Behavioral Activation for Depression Survey [BADS], Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire [ATQ]), in-session effectiveness (Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised [WAI]), and state anhedonia (Dimension Analog Rating Scale [DARS], Visual Analog Scale [VAS]; assessed 3 times: before Active/Calm condition, after, and after therapy) were completed each week. Therapy fidelity ratings were independently coded a standardized codebook. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD) were used to assess DEP at intake, final, and 3-month follow-up. We found strong feasibility and acceptability (100% adherence, 100% retention at final visit, 74.6% therapy fidelity, and high patient satisfaction ratings). Differences between groups favoring ActiveCBT in anhedonia (DARS, Hedges' = 0.92; VAS, = 3.16), within- (WAI, g = 0.1.10), and between-session effectiveness (ATQ g = -0.65; BADS g = -1.40), suggest plausible efficacy of ActiveCBT for enhancing CBT. DEP rates were reduced in both groups from baseline to final (60% MDD SCID remission) and at follow up (Active: 40%; Calm: 25%). Larger and potentially quicker symptom improvement was found favoring the Active condition to the final visit (HAMD, between-group changes g = -1.33; PHQ-9, g = -0.62), with small differences remaining at follow-up (HAMD, g = -0.45; PHQ-9, g = -0.19). Exercise priming appears acceptable and plausibly efficacious for enhancing mechanisms of CBT and overall outcomes, though the present small sample precludes efficacy determinations. It appears feasible to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing ActiveCBT to CalmCBT. Future trials evaluating this potentially promising treatment approach and mediating mechanisms are warranted.
抑郁症(DEP)很常见,目前的治疗方法对许多人无效。这项初步研究的目的是评估一种为期8周的干预措施的可行性、可接受性和可能的疗效,该干预措施是在每周的在线认知行为疗法(CBT)课程之前,安排30分钟规定的中等强度运动(“积极CBT”),并与30分钟的日常活动(“平静CBT”)进行比较。10名被诊断患有DSM-5确诊的当前抑郁症的成年人被随机分组并完成:一次入组评估、八次每周的CBT课程、最终评估和3个月的随访。积极CBT组的参与者在每次标准化的50分钟CBT课程之前被安排进行30分钟的中等强度运动。平静CBT组的参与者在治疗前继续进行30分钟的正常活动。每周完成关于抑郁症状严重程度的问卷(患者健康问卷-9[PHQ-9])、课程间效果(抑郁行为激活调查[BADS]、自动思维问卷[ATQ])、课程内效果(工作联盟量表-简短修订版[WAI])以及状态性快感缺失(维度模拟评分量表[DARS]、视觉模拟量表[VAS];评估3次:在积极/平静状态之前、之后以及治疗之后)。治疗保真度评分使用标准化编码手册进行独立编码。使用DSM-5结构化临床访谈(SCID)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAMD)在入组、最终和3个月随访时评估抑郁症。我们发现了很强的可行性和可接受性(100%的依从性、最终访视时100%的保留率、74.6%的治疗保真度以及高患者满意度评分)。在快感缺失方面(DARS,Hedges' g = 0.92;VAS,g = 3.16)、课程内(WAI,g = 0.110)以及课程间效果方面(ATQ,g = -0.65;BADS,g = -1.40),有利于积极CBT组的组间差异表明积极CBT在增强CBT方面可能有效。两组从基线到最终的抑郁症发生率均有所降低(60%的重度抑郁障碍SCID缓解),在随访时(积极组:40%;平静组:25%)也是如此。发现积极状态在最终访视时症状改善更大且可能更快(HAMD,组间变化g = -1.33;PHQ-9,g = -0.62),在随访时仍存在小差异(HAMD,g = -0.45;PHQ-9,g = -0.19)。运动启动对于增强CBT机制和总体结果似乎是可接受的且可能有效,尽管目前样本量小,无法确定疗效。比较积极CBT和平静CBT的随机对照试验似乎是可行的。有必要进行未来试验来评估这种潜在有前景的治疗方法及其介导机制。