Shelton Christopher R, Hartung Cynthia M, Canu Will H
School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, The Behrend College, 4951 College Drive, Erie, PA 16563 USA.
University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY USA.
J Technol Behav Sci. 2022;7(4):428-438. doi: 10.1007/s41347-022-00256-4. Epub 2022 May 17.
Internet-based interventions (IBIs) to treat psychological disorders are available, but accessibility to these to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in young adult populations is quite limited. The current study examined the feasibility of a proposed IBI for ADHD and participant perceptions regarding treatment and , and outcome Participants ( = 235; aged 18-35) with a prior ADHD diagnosis were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and were provided with a proposed IBI and explanatory outlines of treatment module content. Participants in the cross-sectional study were randomly assigned to either a tailored (i.e., targeted content modules), minimal (i.e., presented overall fewer and non-targeted modules), or full (i.e., all possible modules) condition. Results demonstrated moderate IBI acceptability among participants in the tailored and full conditions. The majority of participants preferred IBI over face-to-face (F2F) treatment, and most individuals who preferred F2F treatment also considered an IBI to be an acceptable treatment modality. Lack of significant mean differences between the tailored and full conditions on several of the main outcomes of interest (e.g., perceptions of acceptability) suggests that implementation of either method of treatment could prove effective. Differences based on treatment length and relevance, and biological sex were also explored. Implications, limitations, and future directions are discussed.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41347-022-00256-4.
基于互联网的干预措施(IBIs)可用于治疗心理障碍,但在年轻成年人群中,这些措施用于治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的可及性相当有限。本研究考察了一种针对ADHD的拟议IBI的可行性以及参与者对治疗和结果的看法。通过亚马逊的土耳其机器人(MTurk)招募了先前被诊断为ADHD的参与者(n = 235;年龄在18 - 35岁之间),并为他们提供了一种拟议的IBI以及治疗模块内容的解释性大纲。横断面研究中的参与者被随机分配到定制组(即有针对性的内容模块)、最小化组(即呈现的总体模块较少且无针对性)或完整组(即所有可能的模块)。结果表明,在定制组和完整组的参与者中,IBI具有中等可接受性。大多数参与者更喜欢IBI而非面对面(F2F)治疗,并且大多数更喜欢F2F治疗的个体也认为IBI是一种可接受的治疗方式。在几个主要关注结果(如可接受性认知)方面,定制组和完整组之间缺乏显著的平均差异,这表明实施这两种治疗方法中的任何一种都可能被证明是有效的。还探讨了基于治疗时长和相关性以及生物学性别的差异。讨论了研究的意义、局限性和未来方向。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s41347 - 022 - 00256 - 4获取的补充材料。