• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triflusulfuron-methyl.活性物质甲基三氟磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2022 May 18;20(5):e07303. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7303. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance benthiavalicarb (variant assessed benthiavalicarb-isopropyl).活性物质苯噻菌胺(评估变体为异丙酯苯噻菌胺)农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2021 Sep 27;19(9):e06833. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6833. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clofentezine.活性物质四螨嗪农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2021 Aug 26;19(8):e06817. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6817. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metiram.活性物质代森联的农药风险评估同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Apr 27;21(4):e07937. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7937. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiacloprid.活性物质噻虫啉农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2019 Mar 14;17(3):e05595. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5595. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance lenacil.活性物质利谷隆农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 5;22(7):e8860. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8860. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance desmedipham.活性物质甜菜安农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 31;16(1):e05150. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5150. eCollection 2018 Jan.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance phenmedipham.活性物质甜菜安农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 31;16(1):e05151. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5151. eCollection 2018 Jan.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dimethomorph.活性物质烯酰吗啉农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 23;21(6):e08032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8032. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance asulam (variant evaluated asulam-sodium).活性物质杀草强(评估变体为杀草强钠)农药风险评估的更新同行评审。
EFSA J. 2021 Nov 11;19(11):e06921. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6921. eCollection 2021 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Thresholds of adversity for endocrine disrupting substances: a conceptual case study.逆境阈值的内分泌干扰物:概念性案例研究。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Jul;98(7):2019-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03748-9. Epub 2024 May 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).关于植物保护产品对蜜蜂( 、 属及独居蜂)风险评估的修订指南
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance rape seed oil.活性物质菜籽油农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2022 May 6;20(5):e07305. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7305. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products.植保产品风险评估中操作人员、工人、居民和旁观者暴露评估指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009.关于在(欧盟)第528/2012号法规和(欧盟)第1107/2009号法规背景下识别内分泌干扰物的指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 7;16(6):e05311. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. eCollection 2018 Jun.
5
Guidance on dermal absorption.皮肤吸收指南。
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 30;15(6):e04873. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4873. eCollection 2017 Jun.

活性物质甲基三氟磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triflusulfuron-methyl.

作者信息

Alvarez Fernando, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Binaglia Marco, Castoldi Anna Federica, Chiusolo Arianna, Colagiorgi Angelo, Colas Mathilde, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Ferilli Franco, Gouliarmou Varvara, Nogareda Laia Herrero, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Kienzler Aude, Lanzoni Anna, Lava Roberto, Linguadoca Alberto, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Terron Andrea, Theobald Anne, Tiramani Manuela, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2022 May 18;20(5):e07303. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7303. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7303
PMID:35600269
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9115678/
Abstract

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, France, and co-rapporteur Member State, Denmark, for the pesticide active substance triflusulfuron-methyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of triflusulfuron-methyl as a herbicide on sugar beet, fodder beet, red beet, chicory and witloof (field uses). The peer review also provided considerations on whether exposure to humans and the environment from the representative uses of triflusulfuron-methyl can be considered negligible, taking into account the European Commission's draft guidance on this topic. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. An evaluation of data concerning the necessity of triflusulfuron-methyl as herbicide to control a serious danger to plant health which cannot be contained by other available means, including non-chemical methods is also presented.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)对报告成员国法国和共同报告成员国丹麦的主管当局针对农药活性物质甲基三氟磺隆开展的初步风险评估进行同行评审后的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号所要求的,并经委员会实施条例(欧盟)第2018/1659号修订。这些结论是在评估甲基三氟磺隆作为除草剂在甜菜、饲料甜菜、红甜菜、菊苣和苦苣(田间使用)上的代表性用途的基础上得出的。同行评审还考虑了根据欧盟委员会关于该主题的指导草案,甲基三氟磺隆的代表性用途对人类和环境的暴露是否可被视为可忽略不计。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。还对甲基三氟磺隆作为除草剂控制对植物健康的严重危害(无法通过包括非化学方法在内的其他可用手段控制)的必要性的数据进行了评估。