• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dimethomorph.活性物质烯酰吗啉农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 23;21(6):e08032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8032. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clofentezine.活性物质四螨嗪农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2021 Aug 26;19(8):e06817. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6817. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance flutolanil.活性物质氟酰胺农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2023 Jun 7;21(6):e07997. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7997. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyrimethanil.活性物质嘧霉胺的农药风险评估同行评审
EFSA J. 2024 Oct 7;22(10):e8998. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8998. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metiram.活性物质代森联的农药风险评估同行评审
EFSA J. 2023 Apr 27;21(4):e07937. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7937. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance triflusulfuron-methyl.活性物质甲基三氟磺隆农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2022 May 18;20(5):e07303. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7303. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance thiacloprid.活性物质噻虫啉农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2019 Mar 14;17(3):e05595. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5595. eCollection 2019 Mar.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance benthiavalicarb (variant assessed benthiavalicarb-isopropyl).活性物质苯噻菌胺(评估变体为异丙酯苯噻菌胺)农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2021 Sep 27;19(9):e06833. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6833. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxamyl.活性物质杀线威农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2022 May 18;20(5):e07296. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7296. eCollection 2022 May.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorpropham.活性物质氯苯胺灵农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 26;15(7):e04903. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4903. eCollection 2017 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic dimethomorph exposure induced behaviors abnormalities and cognitive performance alterations in adult zebrafish ().长期暴露于烯酰吗啉会导致成年斑马鱼出现行为异常和认知能力改变。
Toxicol Rep. 2025 Feb 25;14:101977. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101977. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Thresholds of adversity for endocrine disrupting substances: a conceptual case study.逆境阈值的内分泌干扰物:概念性案例研究。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 Jul;98(7):2019-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03748-9. Epub 2024 May 5.
3
Experiments on Pilot-Scale Constructed Floating Wetlands Efficiency in Removing Agrochemicals.中试规模人工浮床湿地去除农用化学品效率的实验
Toxics. 2022 Dec 15;10(12):790. doi: 10.3390/toxics10120790.
4
Scientific support for preparing an EU position in the 49th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues (CCPR).为欧盟在农药残留法典委员会(CCPR)第49届会议上制定立场提供科学支持。
EFSA J. 2017 Jul 25;15(7):e04929. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4929. eCollection 2017 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).关于植物保护产品对蜜蜂( 、 属及独居蜂)风险评估的修订指南
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products.植保产品风险评估中操作人员、工人、居民和旁观者暴露评估指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
3
Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009.关于在(欧盟)第528/2012号法规和(欧盟)第1107/2009号法规背景下识别内分泌干扰物的指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 7;16(6):e05311. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. eCollection 2018 Jun.

活性物质烯酰吗啉农药风险评估的同行评审

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dimethomorph.

作者信息

Alvarez Fernando, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Binaglia Marco, Castoldi Anna Federica, Chiusolo Arianna, Colagiorgi Angelo, Colas Mathilde, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, De Magistris Isabella, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Ferilli Franco, Gouliarmou Varvara, Halling Katrin, Nogareda Laia Herrero, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Kienzler Aude, Lanzoni Anna, Lava Roberto, Leuschner Renata, Linguadoca Alberto, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Panzarea Martina, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Rizzuto Simone, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Szoradi Andras, Terron Andrea, Theobald Anne, Tiramani Manuela, Vianello Giorgia, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2023 Jun 23;21(6):e08032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8032. eCollection 2023 Jun.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8032
PMID:37359474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10288354/
Abstract

The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State The Netherlands and co-rapporteur Member State Germany for the pesticide active substance dimethomorph and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of dimethomorph as a fungicide applied via foliar spraying on field strawberry and grapevine crops and permanent greenhouse lettuce crops; via drenching on field and permanent greenhouse strawberry crops and via dripping on permanent greenhouse strawberry crops. The peer review also provided considerations on whether exposure to humans and the environment from the representative uses of dimethomorph can be considered negligible, taking into account the European Commission's draft guidance on this topic. MRLs were assessed in potatoes, other root and tuber vegetables (except radishes), stem vegetables (except celery, leeks, globe artichokes, sugar beet, cereal forage and straw). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. The concerns are reported where identified.

摘要

欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)报告了对报告成员国荷兰和联合报告成员国德国的主管当局就农药活性物质烯酰吗啉开展的初始风险评估进行同行评审的结论,以及对最大残留限量(MRL)申请的评估结果。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号(经委员会实施条例(欧盟)第2018/1659号修订)所要求的。这些结论是在评估烯酰吗啉作为杀菌剂在田间草莓和葡萄作物以及永久性温室生菜作物上进行叶面喷施、在田间和永久性温室草莓作物上进行灌根以及在永久性温室草莓作物上进行滴灌等代表性使用情况的基础上得出的。同行评审还根据欧盟委员会关于该主题的指导草案,考虑了烯酰吗啉的代表性使用对人类和环境的暴露是否可被视为可忽略不计。对土豆、其他根和块茎类蔬菜(萝卜除外)、茎类蔬菜(芹菜、韭菜、球茎甘蓝、甜菜、谷物饲料和秸秆除外)的最大残留限量进行了评估。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点以及提议的最大残留限量。列出了监管框架要求的但发现缺失的信息。报告了已识别出的问题。