• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于技术的针对现实世界错误信息的接种。

Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation.

作者信息

Roozenbeek Jon, Traberg Cecilie S, van der Linden Sander

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of the Biological Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 18;9(5):211719. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211719. eCollection 2022 May.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.211719
PMID:35600423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9114974/
Abstract

In recent years, numerous psychological interventions have been developed to reduce susceptibility to misinformation. Inoculation theory has become an increasingly common framework for reducing susceptibility to both individual examples of misinformation (issue-based inoculation) and to the techniques and strategies that are commonly used to mislead or misinform people (technique-based inoculation). In this study, we address two open questions related to technique-based inoculation in two separate experiments (total = 2188; convenience sample recruited via the online game platform): (i) can technique-based inoculation effectively reduce susceptibility to real-world misinformation that went viral on social media? and (ii) can technique-based inoculation confer cross-protection against misinformation that does not make use of any of the techniques against which people were inoculated? We find that playing a 15 min game confers psychological resistance against real-world misinformation that makes use of manipulation techniques against which people were inoculated (Cohen's = 0.37, Cohen's = 64.4%, < 0.001), and that cross-protection is achieved but at a reduced effect size ( = 0.10, = 54.0%, = 0.001).

摘要

近年来,人们开发了许多心理干预措施来降低对错误信息的易感性。接种理论已成为一个越来越普遍的框架,用于降低对个别错误信息示例(基于问题的接种)以及通常用于误导或误传人们的技术和策略(基于技术的接种)的易感性。在本研究中,我们在两个独立的实验(总计 = 2188;通过在线游戏平台招募的便利样本)中解决了与基于技术的接种相关的两个开放性问题:(i)基于技术的接种能否有效降低对在社交媒体上疯传的现实世界错误信息的易感性?以及(ii)基于技术的接种能否对未使用人们接种时所针对的任何技术的错误信息提供交叉保护?我们发现,玩15分钟游戏可对利用人们接种时所针对的操纵技术的现实世界错误信息产生心理抵抗力(科恩d = 0.37,科恩f² = 64.4%,p < 0.001),并且可以实现交叉保护,但效应量有所降低(d = 0.10,f² = 54.0%,p = 0.001)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/180a60fd6653/rsos211719f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/44b91a99e3ba/rsos211719f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/cb974994dc5d/rsos211719f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/47eb13727400/rsos211719f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/06b838531656/rsos211719f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/180a60fd6653/rsos211719f05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/44b91a99e3ba/rsos211719f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/cb974994dc5d/rsos211719f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/47eb13727400/rsos211719f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/06b838531656/rsos211719f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee79/9114974/180a60fd6653/rsos211719f05.jpg

相似文献

1
Technique-based inoculation against real-world misinformation.基于技术的针对现实世界错误信息的接种。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 18;9(5):211719. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211719. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Disentangling Item and Testing Effects in Inoculation Research on Online Misinformation: Solomon Revisited.厘清在线错误信息接种研究中的项目与测试效应:重访所罗门实验
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):340-362. doi: 10.1177/0013164420940378. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
3
Good News about Bad News: Gamified Inoculation Boosts Confidence and Cognitive Immunity Against Fake News.坏消息中的好消息:游戏化接种增强对假新闻的信心和认知免疫力。
J Cogn. 2020 Jan 10;3(1):2. doi: 10.5334/joc.91.
4
Feedback exercises boost discernment of misinformation for gamified inoculation interventions.反馈练习可增强游戏化接种干预措施中对错误信息的辨别能力。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Aug;153(8):2068-2087. doi: 10.1037/xge0001603.
5
Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.接种疫苗对抗错误信息的长期效果:三项纵向实验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Mar;27(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/xap0000315. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation through an Online Game Based on the Inoculation Theory: Analyzing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Threat and Persuasion Knowledge.基于接种理论的在线游戏应对新冠疫情谣言:感知威胁和劝导知识的中介作用分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):980. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20020980.
7
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
Psychological Inoculation for Credibility Assessment, Sharing Intention, and Discernment of Misinformation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心理接种对可信度评估、分享意愿和错误信息识别的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49255. doi: 10.2196/49255.
9
Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media.心理预接种可提高抵御社交媒体错误信息的恢复力。
Sci Adv. 2022 Aug 26;8(34):eabo6254. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo6254. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
Game-based inoculation versus graphic-based inoculation to combat misinformation: a randomized controlled trial.基于游戏的接种与基于图像的接种对抗错误信息:一项随机对照试验。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Jul 31;8(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00505-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prebunking and credible source corrections increase election credibility: Evidence from the US and Brazil.预先辟谣和可靠来源纠正可提高选举可信度:来自美国和巴西的证据。
Sci Adv. 2025 Aug 29;11(35):eadv3758. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adv3758.
2
Countering AI-generated misinformation with pre-emptive source discreditation and debunking.通过先发制人的来源抹黑和辟谣来对抗人工智能生成的错误信息。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 25;12(6):242148. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242148. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Expressions of uncertainty in online science communication hinder information diffusion.

本文引用的文献

1
Disentangling Item and Testing Effects in Inoculation Research on Online Misinformation: Solomon Revisited.厘清在线错误信息接种研究中的项目与测试效应:重访所罗门实验
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Apr;81(2):340-362. doi: 10.1177/0013164420940378. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
3
How to Combat Health Misinformation: A Psychological Approach.
在线科学传播中的不确定性表达阻碍了信息传播。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 4;3(10):pgae439. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae439. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility.社会线索和来源效应对错误信息易感性的说服效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54030-y.
5
Social media for public health: Reaping the benefits, mitigating the harms.社交媒体促进公共卫生:收获益处,减轻危害。
Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Jul 10;13(2):105-112. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.13. eCollection 2023.
6
Recent trends in vaccine coverage and confidence: A cause for concern.疫苗接种率和信心的最新趋势:令人担忧的原因。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Aug 1;19(2):2237374. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2237374.
7
Psychological inoculation protects against the social media infodemic.心理疫苗可预防社交媒体信息疫情。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 8;13(1):5780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32962-1.
8
Psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media: A scoping review.应对社交媒体错误信息的心理干预措施:一项范围综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 5;13:974782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974782. eCollection 2022.
如何对抗健康错误信息:一种心理学方法。
Am J Health Promot. 2022 Mar;36(3):569-575. doi: 10.1177/08901171211070958.
4
Inoculating against the spread of Islamophobic and radical-Islamist disinformation.防范伊斯兰恐惧症和激进伊斯兰主义虚假信息的传播。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Aug 19;6(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00323-z.
5
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA.测量 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息对英国和美国疫苗接种意愿的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Mar;5(3):337-348. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world.世界各地对新冠疫情错误信息的易感性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 14;7(10):201199. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201199. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.接种疫苗对抗错误信息的长期效果:三项纵向实验。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2021 Mar;27(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/xap0000315. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
9
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.社交媒体上抗击 COVID-19 错误信息:可扩展的准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;31(7):770-780. doi: 10.1177/0956797620939054. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India.数字媒体素养干预措施提高了美国和印度民众辨别主流新闻和虚假新闻的能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jul 7;117(27):15536-15545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920498117. Epub 2020 Jun 22.