• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。

Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.

作者信息

van der Linden Sander

机构信息

Department of Psychology, School of Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6
PMID:35273402
Abstract

The spread of misinformation poses a considerable threat to public health and the successful management of a global pandemic. For example, studies find that exposure to misinformation can undermine vaccination uptake and compliance with public-health guidelines. As research on the science of misinformation is rapidly emerging, this conceptual Review summarizes what we know along three key dimensions of the infodemic: susceptibility, spread, and immunization. Extant research is evaluated on the questions of why (some) people are (more) susceptible to misinformation, how misinformation spreads in online social networks, and which interventions can help to boost psychological immunity to misinformation. Implications for managing the infodemic are discussed.

摘要

错误信息的传播对公众健康以及全球大流行的成功应对构成了相当大的威胁。例如,研究发现,接触错误信息会破坏疫苗接种率以及对公共卫生指南的遵守情况。随着关于错误信息科学的研究迅速涌现,这篇概念性综述总结了我们在信息疫情的三个关键维度上所了解的情况:易感性、传播和免疫。本文对现有研究在以下问题上进行了评估:为什么(某些)人(更)容易受到错误信息的影响,错误信息如何在在线社交网络中传播,以及哪些干预措施有助于增强对错误信息的心理论免疫。文中还讨论了应对信息疫情的相关影响因素。

相似文献

1
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
2
A Stanford Conference on Social Media, Ethics, and COVID-19 Misinformation (INFODEMIC): Qualitative Thematic Analysis.斯坦福社交媒体、伦理与 COVID-19 错误信息会议(INFODEMIC):定性主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 15;24(2):e35707. doi: 10.2196/35707.
3
Framework for Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Methods and Results of an Online, Crowdsourced WHO Technical Consultation.管理新冠疫情信息疫情的框架:世卫组织在线众包技术磋商会的方法与结果
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e19659. doi: 10.2196/19659.
4
Infodemic, Misinformation and Disinformation in Pandemics: Scientific Landscape and the Road Ahead for Public Health Informatics Research.大流行中的信息疫情、错误信息和虚假信息:公共卫生信息学研究的科学格局和未来道路。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 27;281:764-768. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210278.
5
Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19.社交媒体上的机器人与错误信息传播:对新冠疫情的影响
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 20;23(5):e26933. doi: 10.2196/26933.
6
Social science approaches to infodemiology: understanding the social, political, and economic context of information.社会科学方法在信息流行病学中的应用:理解信息的社会、政治和经济背景。
Glob Health Promot. 2022 Sep;29(3):140-144. doi: 10.1177/17579759211073174. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
The Challenge of Debunking Health Misinformation in Dynamic Social Media Conversations: Online Randomized Study of Public Masking During COVID-19.揭穿动态社交媒体对话中健康错误信息的挑战:COVID-19 期间公众戴口罩的在线随机研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 2;24(3):e34831. doi: 10.2196/34831.
8
Misinformation, believability, and vaccine acceptance over 40 countries: Takeaways from the initial phase of the COVID-19 infodemic.40 多个国家的错误信息、可信度与疫苗接种:新冠疫情信息流初始阶段的重要发现。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263381. eCollection 2022.
9
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.
10
A Deadly Infodemic: Social Media and the Power of COVID-19 Misinformation.致命的信息疫情:社交媒体与新冠病毒错误信息的力量。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 1;24(2):e35552. doi: 10.2196/35552.

引用本文的文献

1
One pathogen does not an epidemic make: a review of interacting contagions, diseases, beliefs, and stories.一种病原体并不构成一场流行病:对相互作用的传染病、疾病、观念及故事的综述
Npj Complex. 2025;2(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s44260-025-00050-2. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Using narrative and informational messages to improve correctional professionals' attitudes toward medications for opioid use disorder.运用叙述性和信息性信息来改善惩教专业人员对阿片类药物使用障碍药物治疗的态度。
Health Justice. 2025 Aug 26;13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00363-3.
3
Supporters and Skeptics: LLM-based Analysis of Engagement with Mental Health (Mis)Information Content on Video-sharing Platforms.

本文引用的文献

1
Partisan bias in the identification of fake news.在识别假新闻方面的党派偏见。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Sep;25(9):723-724. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
2
Ibuprofen and COVID-19 disease: separating the myths from facts.布洛芬与 COVID-19 疾病:厘清事实与谣言。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Aug;15(8):979-983. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2021.1951239. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
3
Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media.外群体敌意推动社交媒体参与度。
支持者与怀疑者:基于大语言模型对视频分享平台上心理健康(错误)信息内容的参与度分析
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2025 Jun 7;19:1329-1345. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35875.
4
The collaborative evolution of trust, information flow, and social cooperation: a study on network stability based on dynamic game models.信任、信息流与社会合作的协同演化:基于动态博弈模型的网络稳定性研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13355-y.
5
Misinformation on cardiovascular disease spreads through social networks: a scoping review protocol.心血管疾病相关错误信息通过社交网络传播:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 16;15(7):e094167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094167.
6
Trust in doctors, social support, and belief in COVID-19 misinformation.对医生的信任、社会支持以及对新冠疫情错误信息的相信。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23470-0.
7
An Exploratory Network Analysis of Discussion Topics About Autism Across Subreddit Communities.跨子版块社区对自闭症相关讨论话题的探索性网络分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;15(6):812. doi: 10.3390/bs15060812.
8
How belief in conspiracy theories could harm sustainability.对阴谋论的相信如何损害可持续性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02243-0.
9
How media competition fuels the spread of misinformation.媒体竞争如何助长错误信息的传播。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jun 20;11(25):eadu7743. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu7743. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
10
Considerations for mRNA Product Development, Regulation and Deployment Across the Lifecycle.mRNA产品全生命周期开发、监管与应用的考量因素
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Apr 28;13(5):473. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13050473.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 29;118(26). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024292118.
4
A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial.在荷兰开展的一项针对老年人的数字随机试验:运用辟谣内容与非辟谣内容的媒体干预措施来对抗疫苗错误信息
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 15;35:100881. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100881. eCollection 2021 May.
5
How Accurate Are Accuracy-Nudge Interventions? A Preregistered Direct Replication of Pennycook et al. (2020).准确性提示干预措施有多准确?对彭尼库克等人(2020 年)的预先注册直接复制。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;32(7):1169-1178. doi: 10.1177/09567976211024535. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
6
A preregistered replication of motivated numeracy.动机算术再现的预先注册。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104768. Epub 2021 May 26.
7
The Covid-19 Infodemic - Applying the Epidemiologic Model to Counter Misinformation.新冠疫情信息疫情——应用流行病学模型应对错误信息
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 19;385(8):678-681. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2103798. Epub 2021 May 12.
8
How Can Psychological Science Help Counter the Spread of Fake News?心理学如何助力阻击假新闻传播?
Span J Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;24:e25. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2021.23.
9
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.将注意力转移到准确性上可以减少网络上的错误信息。
Nature. 2021 Apr;592(7855):590-595. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
10
Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses.谁容易受到网络健康谣言的影响?对四个心理社会假设的检验。
Health Psychol. 2021 Apr;40(4):274-284. doi: 10.1037/hea0000978. Epub 2021 Mar 1.