Rong Fangning, Xiang Huaqiang, Qian Lu, Xue Yangjing, Ji Kangting, Yin Ripen
Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 6;9:849688. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.849688. eCollection 2022.
The management of cardiogenic shock (CS) in the elderly remains a major clinical challenge. Existing clinical prediction models have not performed well in assessing the prognosis of elderly patients with CS. This study aims to build a predictive model, which could better predict the 30-day mortality of elderly patients with CS.
We extracted data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III version 1.4 (MIMIC-III) as the training set and the data of validation sets were collected from the Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Three models, including the cox regression model, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression model, and the CoxBoost model, were established using the training set. Through the comparison of area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), C index, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and median improvement in risk score, the best model was selected. Then for external validation, compared the best model with the simplified acute physiology score II (SAPSII) and the CardShock risk score.
A total of 919 patients were included in the study, of which 804 patients were in the training set and 115 patients were in the verification set. Using the training set, we built three models: the cox regression model including 6 predictors, the LASSO regression model including 4 predictors, and the CoxBoost model including 16 predictors. Among them, the CoxBoost model had good discrimination [AUC: 0.730; C index: 0.6958 (0.6657, 0.7259)]. Compared with the CoxBoost model, the NRI, IDI, and median improvement in risk score of other models were all<0. In the validation set, the CoxBoost model was also well-discriminated [AUC: 0.770; C index: 0.7713 (0.6751, 0.8675)]. Compared with the CoxBoost model, the NRI, IDI, and median improvement in risk score of SAPS II and the CardShock risk score were all < 0. And we constructed a dynamic nomogram to visually display the model.
In conclusion, this study showed that in predicting the 30-day mortality of elderly CS patients, the CoxBoost model was superior to the Cox regression model, LASSO regression model, SAPS II, and the CardShock risk score.
老年心源性休克(CS)的管理仍然是一项重大临床挑战。现有的临床预测模型在评估老年CS患者的预后方面表现不佳。本研究旨在构建一个预测模型,以更好地预测老年CS患者的30天死亡率。
我们从重症监护医学信息数据库第三版1.4(MIMIC-III)中提取数据作为训练集,并从温州医科大学附属第二医院和育英儿童医院收集验证集数据。使用训练集建立了三个模型,包括cox回归模型(Cox regression model)、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归模型(Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression model)和CoxBoost模型。通过比较受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)、C指数、净重新分类改善(NRI)、综合判别改善(IDI)和风险评分的中位数改善情况,选择最佳模型。然后进行外部验证,将最佳模型与简化急性生理学评分II(SAPSII)和心源性休克风险评分(CardShock risk score)进行比较。
本研究共纳入919例患者,其中804例患者作为训练集,115例患者作为验证集。利用训练集,我们构建了三个模型:包含6个预测因子的cox回归模型、包含4个预测因子的LASSO回归模型和包含16个预测因子的CoxBoost模型。其中,CoxBoost模型具有良好的判别能力[AUC:0.730;C指数:0.6958(0.6657,0.7259)]。与CoxBoost模型相比,其他模型的NRI、IDI和风险评分的中位数改善均<0。在验证集中,CoxBoost模型也具有良好的判别能力[AUC:0.770;C指数:0.7713(0.6751,0.8675)]。与CoxBoost模型相比,SAPS II和心源性休克风险评分的NRI、IDI和风险评分的中位数改善均<0。并且我们构建了一个动态列线图来直观展示该模型。
总之,本研究表明,在预测老年CS患者的30天死亡率方面,CoxBoost模型优于Cox回归模型、LASSO回归模型、SAPS II和心源性休克风险评分。