Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情后价格上涨的背景及感知公平性

Context and the Perceived Fairness of Price Increases Coming out of COVID-19.

作者信息

Chavanne David, Danz Zak, Dribssa Jitu, Powell Rachel, Sambor Matthew

机构信息

Connecticut College New London Connecticut.

出版信息

Soc Sci Q. 2022 Jan;103(1):55-68. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13121. Epub 2022 Feb 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

As the U.S. economy responds to prolonged COVID-19 disruptions, it is important to understand what factors affect the perceived fairness of pandemic-driven price increases.

METHODS

Participants read a vignette and rated how fair they found a pandemic-driven price increase. Versions vary (1) the source (hardware-store products or bus fare), (2) the magnitude of the price increase (6 percent or 18 percent), and (3) the tone of an initial description of COVID (positive or negative).

RESULTS

The price increase was perceived to be fairer when it involved the hardware store or when it was smaller. The relationship between fairness and magnitude was context-specific, as fairness perceptions were insensitive to the magnitude of the price increase in the bus scenario or when the initial description of COVID had a positive tone.

CONCLUSION

Retailers and municipalities may face different fairness constraints as they consider pandemic-driven price increases. The tone of COVID information may affect price fairness through its impact on sensitivity to magnitude.

摘要

目的

鉴于美国经济对长期新冠疫情干扰做出反应,了解哪些因素会影响人们对疫情引发的价格上涨的公平感认知非常重要。

方法

参与者阅读一个小场景描述,并对他们认为疫情引发的价格上涨有多公平进行评分。版本在以下方面有所不同:(1)来源(五金店产品或公交票价),(2)价格上涨幅度(6%或18%),以及(3)对新冠疫情初始描述的语气(积极或消极)。

结果

当价格上涨涉及五金店或涨幅较小时,人们认为价格上涨更公平。公平感与涨幅之间的关系因具体情境而异,因为在公交场景中或当对新冠疫情的初始描述语气为积极时,公平感认知对价格上涨幅度不敏感。

结论

零售商和市政当局在考虑疫情引发的价格上涨时可能面临不同的公平性限制。新冠疫情信息的语气可能通过影响对涨幅的敏感度来影响价格公平性。

相似文献

8
Fair Representation: Guaranteeing Approximate Multiple Group Fairness for Unknown Tasks.公平表示:为未知任务保证近似多组公平性
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2023 Jan;45(1):525-538. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3148905. Epub 2022 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
How do different kinds of incidental emotions influence risk decision making?不同类型的偶然情绪如何影响风险决策?
Biol Psychol. 2020 Jul;154:107920. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107920. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Incidental emotions influence risk preference and outcome evaluation.偶然情绪会影响风险偏好和结果评估。
Psychophysiology. 2016 Oct;53(10):1542-51. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12694. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Stated and revealed inequality aversion in three subject pools.三个受试者群体中陈述的和显示出的不平等厌恶。
J Econ Sci Assoc. 2015 Jul;1(1):43-58. doi: 10.1007/s40881-015-0007-1. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
6
The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice.跨期选择的可塑性
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;20(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
8
The behavioral and neural effect of emotional primes on intertemporal decisions.情绪启动对跨期决策的行为和神经影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Mar;9(3):283-91. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss132. Epub 2012 Nov 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验