• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑碳配额政策下公平关切的低碳供应链最优定价决策。

Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy.

机构信息

School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China.

School of Business Administration, Hunan University of Finance and Economics, Changsha 410205, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020556.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18020556
PMID:33440824
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7827091/
Abstract

This research investigates the effect of fairness concerns on a sustainable low-carbon supply chain (LCSC) with a carbon quota policy, in which a manufacturer is in charge of manufacturing low-carbon products and sells them to a retailer. The demand is affected by price and the carbon emission reduction rate. The optimal decisions of pricing and carbon emission reduction rate are analyzed under four decision models: (i) centralized decision, (ii) decentralized decision without fairness concern, (iii) decentralized decision with manufacturer's fairness concern, (iv) decentralized decision with retailer's fairness concern. The results indicate that the profits in the centralized LCSC are higher than those in the decentralized LCSC with fairness concern. If a manufacturer pays close attention to fairness, the fairness concern coefficient will reduce the carbon emission reduction rate and the profit of the LCSC and increase the wholesale price and the retail price of the product. If a retailer pays close attention to fairness, and the preference of consumers for a low-carbon product is low, the fairness concern coefficient of the retailer increases the total profit of the LCSC and decreases the carbon emission reduction rate and retail price of the product. Otherwise, if the preference of consumers for a low-carbon product is great, the fairness concern coefficient of the retailer would lead to a lower retail price compared with the retail price in the centralized decision and decrease the total profit of the LCSC.

摘要

本研究调查了公平关切对带有碳配额政策的可持续低碳供应链(LCSC)的影响,其中制造商负责制造低碳产品并将其销售给零售商。需求受价格和碳减排率的影响。在四种决策模型下分析了定价和碳减排率的最优决策:(i)集中决策,(ii)无公平关切的分散决策,(iii)制造商公平关切的分散决策,(iv)零售商公平关切的分散决策。结果表明,集中式 LCSC 的利润高于具有公平关切的分散式 LCSC。如果制造商关注公平,公平关切系数将降低 LCSC 的碳减排率和利润,并提高批发价格和产品零售价格。如果零售商关注公平,且消费者对低碳产品的偏好较低,零售商的公平关切系数将增加 LCSC 的总利润,并降低产品的碳减排率和零售价格。否则,如果消费者对低碳产品的偏好很大,零售商的公平关切系数将导致与集中决策下的零售价格相比,零售价格较低,并降低 LCSC 的总利润。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/17198faa192c/ijerph-18-00556-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/f18ad734d4a2/ijerph-18-00556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/a7de5e606e47/ijerph-18-00556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/d3fab0c4ee18/ijerph-18-00556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/6e26153c82c8/ijerph-18-00556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/e51211953d0a/ijerph-18-00556-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/a2b5fc6f811c/ijerph-18-00556-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/5e91ae0a685c/ijerph-18-00556-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/17198faa192c/ijerph-18-00556-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/f18ad734d4a2/ijerph-18-00556-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/a7de5e606e47/ijerph-18-00556-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/d3fab0c4ee18/ijerph-18-00556-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/6e26153c82c8/ijerph-18-00556-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/e51211953d0a/ijerph-18-00556-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/a2b5fc6f811c/ijerph-18-00556-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/5e91ae0a685c/ijerph-18-00556-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8243/7827091/17198faa192c/ijerph-18-00556-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下公平关切的低碳供应链最优定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020556.
2
Research the effect of anticipated regret and fairness concerns on retailer-led supply chain.研究预期后悔和公平关切对零售商主导供应链的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):e0279334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279334. eCollection 2023.
3
The Stability and Complexity Analysis of a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern Behavior and Sales Service.考虑公平关切行为和销售服务的低碳供应链的稳定性和复杂性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 30;16(15):2711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152711.
4
Coordination Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下风险规避的低碳供应链协调决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052656.
5
Joint Decision-Making and the Coordination of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Tax Regulation and Fairness Concerns.考虑碳税监管和公平关切的可持续供应链的联合决策与协调。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 27;14(12):1464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121464.
6
Dynamic analysis of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns under carbon tax regulation.考虑碳税政策的公平关切的双渠道闭环供应链动态分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57543-57565. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19715-9. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns.考虑水平和垂直公平关切的两个竞争制造商的绿色供应链定价决策分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66235-66258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19892-7. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference.考虑消费者环境意识和渠道偏好的公平关切和利他偏好的绿色双渠道供应链定价策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13564. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013564.
9
Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect.考虑利他行为和参考低碳效应的供应链联合减排差异决策与协调。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22325-22349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16901-z. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
10
A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors.考虑退货率和公平关切行为的低碳闭环供应链动态价格博弈模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 4;16(11):1978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111978.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Carbon Abatement Strategy for Manufacturers under Cap-and-Trade.在总量管制与交易制度下制造商的最佳碳减排策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 2;19(17):10987. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710987.
2
A Comparative Study of the Effect of Different Carbon-Reduction Policies on Outsourcing Remanufacturing.不同碳减排政策对外包再制造影响的比较研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3590. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063590.
3
Extended Warranty Strategy and Its Environment Impact of Remanufactured Supply Chain.

本文引用的文献

1
The Stability and Complexity Analysis of a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern Behavior and Sales Service.考虑公平关切行为和销售服务的低碳供应链的稳定性和复杂性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 30;16(15):2711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152711.
2
A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors.考虑退货率和公平关切行为的低碳闭环供应链动态价格博弈模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 4;16(11):1978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111978.
3
Joint Decision-Making and the Coordination of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Tax Regulation and Fairness Concerns.
再制造供应链的延长保修策略及其环境影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 28;19(3):1526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031526.
4
Exploring volatility of carbon price in European Union due to COVID-19 pandemic.探讨 COVID-19 大流行对欧盟碳价波动的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(6):8269-8280. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16052-1. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
考虑碳税监管和公平关切的可持续供应链的联合决策与协调。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 27;14(12):1464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121464.
4
Coordinating Leader-Follower Supply Chain with Sustainable Green Technology Innovation on Their Fairness Concerns.协调领导者-追随者供应链中基于公平关切的可持续绿色技术创新
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 8;14(11):1357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14111357.