Shankar Mishra Prem, Jamadar Mudassar, Tripathy Abhipsa, Anand Ankit
Population Research Centre, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bengaluru, 560072 Karnataka India.
Centre for Research in Urban Affairs, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, 560072 Karnataka India.
Child Indic Res. 2022;15(5):1871-1888. doi: 10.1007/s12187-022-09943-3. Epub 2022 May 16.
India has witnessed increasing trends in internal migration over the last three decades. In India, migrant children are not a homogeneous group and their reasons for movement and vulnerabilities vary across socio-economic stratum. For some children, migration may open possibilities and is associated with expanding social and economic spheres, but for many others, it may bring serious risks. Therefore, the study has been carried out to understand socio-economic vulnerability in child nutrition with migration status and other contributing factors in India. This study used data from the National Family Health Survey, the fourth in the NFHS series which was conducted in 2015-2016 (NFHS-4). We were interested in looking at the children age 12-59 months for their nutritional indicators such as stunting and underweight across migrants and non-migrants children. This resulted in a sample of 199,448 children in selected age group and among them 33.1% children belongs to the migrant family as compared to 67% of non-migrant children. Overall, 44.2% of children were stunted and 39.5% were underweight among non-migrant children as compared to 37.4% & 32.8% of migrant children were stunted and underweight respectively. Further, the results showed that among the social groups, scheduled caste children were found a high variation in underweight (34% vs. 41.6%) and stunting (36% vs. 46%) between migrants and non-migrants children. Similar trend of malnourishment is found in the poor wealth quintile, for rural residents and low educated women with non-migrant status. Those children who were poor but non-migrant were more likely to be malnourished as underweight [aOR; 1.15, CI: 1.11-1.18] and stunted [aOR; 1.17, CI:1.13-1.20] as compared to migrant status children in the same category of the household. Similarly in reference to scheduled caste migrant group, the scheduled caste non-migrant were more likely to be underweight [aOR; 1.15, CI: 1.09-1.20] and stunted [aOR; 1.18, CI: 1.12-1.23] than the children with migrant status. There were huge differences between migrant and non-migrant children in nutritional statuses. Education, caste and wealth index are found to be an important variables to explain the differential between migrants and non-migrants in child's nutritional aspects. Children associated with poor socio-economic vulnerability and non-migrant category need to be taken care of more and a community targeted approach is required to understand the gaps. The programs such as ICDS, and Poshan Abhiyan need to be revamped adding the migration aspect of the families and children in terms of their health and nutritional aspects.
在过去三十年里,印度国内移民呈上升趋势。在印度,流动儿童并非一个同质化群体,他们的流动原因和脆弱性因社会经济阶层而异。对一些儿童来说,移民可能带来机遇,并与社会和经济领域的拓展相关联,但对许多其他儿童而言,这可能带来严重风险。因此,开展了这项研究,以了解印度儿童营养方面的社会经济脆弱性与移民状况及其他影响因素。本研究使用了2015 - 2016年进行的全国家庭健康调查(NFHS系列中的第四次,即NFHS - 4)的数据。我们关注12至59个月大儿童的营养指标,如发育迟缓及体重不足情况,对比流动儿童和非流动儿童。这使得选定年龄组中有199,448名儿童作为样本,其中33.1%的儿童属于流动家庭,而非流动儿童占67%。总体而言,非流动儿童中44.2%发育迟缓,39.5%体重不足,相比之下,流动儿童中发育迟缓与体重不足的比例分别为37.4%和32.8%。此外,结果显示,在社会群体中,在册种姓儿童的体重不足(34%对41.6%)和发育迟缓(36%对46%)在流动儿童和非流动儿童之间存在很大差异。在贫困财富五分位数组、农村居民以及未流动的低学历女性中也发现了类似的营养不良趋势。与同一家庭类别中流动儿童相比,贫困但未流动的儿童更易出现体重不足[调整后比值比(aOR);1.15,置信区间(CI):1.11 - 1.18]和发育迟缓[aOR;1.17,CI:1.13 - 1.20]。同样,就在册种姓流动群体而言,在册种姓非流动儿童比流动儿童更易出现体重不足[aOR;1.15,CI:1.09 - 1.20]和发育迟缓[aOR;1.18,CI:1.12 - 1.23]。流动儿童和非流动儿童在营养状况方面存在巨大差异。教育、种姓和财富指数被发现是解释流动儿童和非流动儿童在营养方面差异的重要变量。与社会经济脆弱性较差且属于非流动类别的儿童需要更多关注,需要采取针对社区的方法来了解差距。诸如综合儿童发展服务计划(ICDS)和“营养改善行动”等项目需要进行改进,将家庭和儿童的移民方面在其健康和营养方面加以考量。